AI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news, BBC finds
-
Lame platitude
-
Wrong thread?
-
I'm pretty sure that every user of Apple Intelligence could've told you that. If AI is good at anything, it isn't things that require nuance and factual accuracy.
-
Oh yes. The LLM will lie to you, confidently.
-
No better time to get into self hosting!
-
You're supposed to gatekeep code. There is nothing wrong with gatekeeping things that aren't hobbies.
If someone can't explain every change they're making and why they chose to do it that way they're getting denied. The bar is low.
-
Exactly. I think this is a good barometer of gauging whether or not you can trust it. Ask it about things you know you're good at or knowledgeable about. If it is giving good information, the type you would give out, then it is probably OK. If it is bullshitting you or making you go 'uhh, no, actually...' then you need to do more old-school research.
-
Yeah seriously just look at Sam Bankman-Fried and that Theranos dipshit. Both bullshitted their way into millions. Only difference is that Altman and Musk's bubbles haven't popped yet.
-
It wouldn't have the administrative access. You don't need admin access to use a computer system you need admin access to configure stuff but there's no reason for the AI to have that.
Anyway if AI is going to be useful to businesses it needs to be able to interface with their legacy applications.
-
Perplexity misquoted BBC News in a story about the Middle East, saying Iran initially showed “restraint” and described Israel’s actions as “aggressive”
I did not even read up to there but wow BBC really went there openly.
-
@echodot @Redex68 off top of my head, script generation. making content more readable. dictating a brain dump while walking and having it spit out a cohesive summary.
it's all about the prompt you put in. shit in/shit out. And making sure you check/understand what it spits out. and that sometimes it's garbage.
