Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Microblog Memes
  3. She's out there

She's out there

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Microblog Memes
microblogmemes
37 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • whoisearth@lemmy.caW [email protected]

    You both are right. You're right because it's important. They're right because no one gives a shit.

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #28

    I would only agree that people who are ignorant or willfully ignorant will not care, but that does not give any strength to their argument. It just acknowledges mass ignorance.

    whoisearth@lemmy.caW 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • H [email protected]

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #29

      Yeah yeah. The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed. Notice that I never said an LLM is not a form or subset of AI at all. The term "AI" has a much broader scope than an LLM and because of that people think it can do more than it is capable. An LLM cannot reason—it just predicts the next most likely word to follow with some additional weights as a loose guideline.

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G [email protected]

        Yeah yeah. The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed. Notice that I never said an LLM is not a form or subset of AI at all. The term "AI" has a much broader scope than an LLM and because of that people think it can do more than it is capable. An LLM cannot reason—it just predicts the next most likely word to follow with some additional weights as a loose guideline.

        H This user is from outside of this forum
        H This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #30

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • H [email protected]

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect

          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #31

          Posting only a link to a wikipedia page is obnoxious. You're not even bothering to explain how you think it's relevant. In this case that would be particularly important since the "AI effect" you linked has nothing to do with what I said.

          Are you too lazy to even explain, are incapable of explaining, or are you just regurgitating whatever you can find in an attempt to overwhelm with low-effort "arguments"? (This is rhetorical. Please just go away, since you're clearly only here with bad faith.)

          H 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • track_shovel@slrpnk.netT [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            samus12345@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
            samus12345@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #32

            She knows all your secrets.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • G [email protected]

              Posting only a link to a wikipedia page is obnoxious. You're not even bothering to explain how you think it's relevant. In this case that would be particularly important since the "AI effect" you linked has nothing to do with what I said.

              Are you too lazy to even explain, are incapable of explaining, or are you just regurgitating whatever you can find in an attempt to overwhelm with low-effort "arguments"? (This is rhetorical. Please just go away, since you're clearly only here with bad faith.)

              H This user is from outside of this forum
              H This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #33

              The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed.

              "The AI effect" refers to a phenomenon where either the definition of AI or the concept of intelligence is adjusted to exclude capabilities that AI systems have mastered.

              G J 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • H [email protected]

                The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed.

                "The AI effect" refers to a phenomenon where either the definition of AI or the concept of intelligence is adjusted to exclude capabilities that AI systems have mastered.

                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #34

                Lazy and wrong. You are intentionally misinterpreting what I said and conveniently disregarding other things I said that contradict your incorrect use. You're simply trying to disingenuously undermine my points rather than have a good faith discussion.

                I already asked, please go away.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H [email protected]

                  The definition of AI has now fundamentally changed.

                  "The AI effect" refers to a phenomenon where either the definition of AI or the concept of intelligence is adjusted to exclude capabilities that AI systems have mastered.

                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #35

                  these sorts of people don’t care lmao.

                  not to be shitty and/or pessimistic but i sincerely doubt they will even reflect on your exchange at all, let alone enough to learn anything.

                  idc anymore bro fuck the haters there’s absolutely nothing special about human sentience it’s just an emergent field behavior that a wide range of information systems can replicate and even emulate outright. there’s this awful idea the rabidly “anti-AI” crowd has that places humans in a higher position on the cosmological order than we actually occupy in reality. it genuinely pisses me off because it’s so boneheadedly arrogant.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • G [email protected]

                    That is a fundamentally incorrect interpretation of what a director does. Though, I see what you're trying to say with that exceedingly off-the-mark analogy. That just had to be said.

                    Ultimately, due to how subjective the idea of art is there's nothing I can say to convince you that this perspective is wrong. As long as people want something to be considered art, they will find a way to craft an interpretation that makes it work.

                    Just as I was able to take your meaning with your analogy and not dismiss it because it's so incorrect, I expect you and others to understand the meaning of art being "created." Instead you decided to leverage the broader concept of what is created in order to manipulate the idea to encompass generated images. I don't think this discussion could possibly turn out as anything but a frustrating and negative experience, so I will step away from it. Suffice it to say that we will simply always disagree on this subject.

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #36

                    That is a fundamentally incorrect interpretation of what a director does.

                    Then explain where my analogy fails.

                    Ultimately, due to how subjective the idea of art is there’s nothing I can say to convince you that this perspective is wrong.

                    You can change my mind by explaining how a director is different than what I've seen in hundreds of behind the scenes commentaries and documentaries on movie creation. To be more specific, some directors are also writers, storyboarders or cinematographers. But those are additional jobs that not all directors do.

                    because it’s so incorrect,

                    You need to explain why it is incorrect.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G [email protected]

                      I would only agree that people who are ignorant or willfully ignorant will not care, but that does not give any strength to their argument. It just acknowledges mass ignorance.

                      whoisearth@lemmy.caW This user is from outside of this forum
                      whoisearth@lemmy.caW This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #37

                      Many of us know this. It's not new. Change what you can, learn to accept or ignore what you can't

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups