So proud!
-
Max comment depth reached.
I'm just going to keep asking this question until you either quote your alleged answer, or give a new one:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Neat.
Keep asking whenever you'd like but I'm not playing this game with you. I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again.
Literally just read the comment chain and quit asking the same question over and over. You're not going to get the answer you want with a rapist mentality either boss but it does kinda evidence how gross you're willing to be.
-
Neat.
Keep asking whenever you'd like but I'm not playing this game with you. I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again.
Literally just read the comment chain and quit asking the same question over and over. You're not going to get the answer you want with a rapist mentality either boss but it does kinda evidence how gross you're willing to be.
wrote last edited by [email protected]It's funny, every time you've accused me of not answering a question, I've provided screenshots and direct quotes. Pretty disingenuous of you not to do the same.
I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again
I believe that you believe that's true. But having read that thread, I see nothing resembling an answer to that question. And since you refuse to just quote it, I have to assume it's just buried in your unreadable grammar and mess of typos.
So let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
It's funny, every time you've accused me of not answering a question, I've provided screenshots and direct quotes. Pretty disingenuous of you not to do the same.
I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again
I believe that you believe that's true. But having read that thread, I see nothing resembling an answer to that question. And since you refuse to just quote it, I have to assume it's just buried in your unreadable grammar and mess of typos.
So let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
And I've directly linked the content chain that provides your answer, so crying because I'm not doing it in a dumber way.
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Keep asking the same question and I'm hoping to link the same answer but no no, keep on asking until you get a yes. That's a reasonable way to act.
-
And I've directly linked the content chain that provides your answer, so crying because I'm not doing it in a dumber way.
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Keep asking the same question and I'm hoping to link the same answer but no no, keep on asking until you get a yes. That's a reasonable way to act.
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Look who's abandoning their argument in favor of an ad hominem. What a surprise.
Let's see if I can guess what you think you wrote that answers my question!
Is it this?
Nope not at all. I said it's a bigoted word and if you use it as it's intended you're a bigot. This isn't difficult.
Because that does not answer my question.
-
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Look who's abandoning their argument in favor of an ad hominem. What a surprise.
Let's see if I can guess what you think you wrote that answers my question!
Is it this?
Nope not at all. I said it's a bigoted word and if you use it as it's intended you're a bigot. This isn't difficult.
Because that does not answer my question.
Yeah let's complain about that while badgering sometime until they give you the answer you want..... The one you've already gotten.
It's that all that was in that comment chain or even in that response to your question? No! You didn't even bother quoting the direct answer. So tell me how I'm wrong about your reading comprehension.
-
And I've directly linked the content chain that provides your answer, so crying because I'm not doing it in a dumber way.
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Keep asking the same question and I'm hoping to link the same answer but no no, keep on asking until you get a yes. That's a reasonable way to act.
Hmm, okay, I'll guess again!
Is it this?
All the parts you're intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.
Because that also doesn't answer my question, if so.
-
Hmm, okay, I'll guess again!
Is it this?
All the parts you're intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.
Because that also doesn't answer my question, if so.
Try again genius, it's not like it's in the first 7 words or anything.
-
Try again genius, it's not like it's in the first 7 words or anything.
Hmm, it can't be that. The first 7 words of what you linked are:
You doesn't respond to a single one
Which is definitely not an answer to the question:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
Hmm, it can't be that. The first 7 words of what you linked are:
You doesn't respond to a single one
Which is definitely not an answer to the question:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
I get that reading is an issue for you but there's not that many comments, I'm sure you can figure it out for yourself.
-
I get that reading is an issue for you but there's not that many comments, I'm sure you can figure it out for yourself.
Oh darn. Okay, is it this?
I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.
You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?
If so, there's nothing in there that answers my question either.
-
Oh darn. Okay, is it this?
I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.
You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?
If so, there's nothing in there that answers my question either.
Keep trying.
Theres only like 30 comments, you didn't ask a question in all of them right? So find the ones you asked the question and then look to see if you got an answer. It's really not that hard to find if you look.
-
Keep trying.
Theres only like 30 comments, you didn't ask a question in all of them right? So find the ones you asked the question and then look to see if you got an answer. It's really not that hard to find if you look.
Ok so starting with the comment you linked: https://lemmy.world/comment/18496795
That one and the next response we covered, and they are responses to questions, but don't include the answer we're looking for.
Moving on to the next time I ask any questions is here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/55968
Your response was:
Jesus Christ, you're somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.
Why are you quoting yourself?
It is sexist no matter the context, I'm not using it against anyone so I'm not a bigot I'm just exampling a bigoted word. You're being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there's some moral reason to do it but that's all ex post facto.
It's sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.
Is that it? Because if so, that's also not an answer to my question, which, again is:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
Ok so starting with the comment you linked: https://lemmy.world/comment/18496795
That one and the next response we covered, and they are responses to questions, but don't include the answer we're looking for.
Moving on to the next time I ask any questions is here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/55968
Your response was:
Jesus Christ, you're somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.
Why are you quoting yourself?
It is sexist no matter the context, I'm not using it against anyone so I'm not a bigot I'm just exampling a bigoted word. You're being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there's some moral reason to do it but that's all ex post facto.
It's sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.
Is that it? Because if so, that's also not an answer to my question, which, again is:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
wrote last edited by [email protected]https://lemmy.world/comment/18443585
Try again
Ed:
Perfect! So we agree that a woman can, without herself being a bigot/sexist/etc, believe a man is being misogynistic towards her. You also confirmed this is true for condescension.
Lazy, gaslighting or stupid I think you know what my bet would be.
-
https://lemmy.world/comment/18443585
Try again
Ed:
Perfect! So we agree that a woman can, without herself being a bigot/sexist/etc, believe a man is being misogynistic towards her. You also confirmed this is true for condescension.
Lazy, gaslighting or stupid I think you know what my bet would be.
wrote last edited by [email protected]That's still not an answer to my question...
What's the scenario?
Let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
That's still not an answer to my question...
What's the scenario?
Let's try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
You could have just said gaslighting instead whatever this is.
-
You could have just said gaslighting instead whatever this is.
Dang, I thought you might be done playing your little game, but I guess not.
Since you're accusing me of gaslighting now, lets soldier on, line-by-line!
Is this the line you think is an answer to my question:
Yeah no one ever denied that.
Because that's not an answer to my question.
-
Dang, I thought you might be done playing your little game, but I guess not.
Since you're accusing me of gaslighting now, lets soldier on, line-by-line!
Is this the line you think is an answer to my question:
Yeah no one ever denied that.
Because that's not an answer to my question.
Ya huh, I'm the one playing the games.. uh huh.
i quoted you exclaiming that you got your answer and your response is "that didn't answer my question".
How so crazy person, how so?
-
Ya huh, I'm the one playing the games.. uh huh.
i quoted you exclaiming that you got your answer and your response is "that didn't answer my question".
How so crazy person, how so?
You quoted me exclaiming that I got an answer to this question:
Okay, so if the man is “probably” being misogynistic, that’s enough that a woman can believe they are being misogynistic without herself being a bigot/sexist/misandrist?
Which is an different question than:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
-
You quoted me exclaiming that I got an answer to this question:
Okay, so if the man is “probably” being misogynistic, that’s enough that a woman can believe they are being misogynistic without herself being a bigot/sexist/misandrist?
Which is an different question than:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?
Those are the same question the second time is simply you hedging more because you didn't get to use my answer against me.
You're gaslighting or you're dumb. Either way go away, you're not trying to be productive you're trying to be annoying and gross what?! Mission successful you're a troll, good job.
-
Those are the same question the second time is simply you hedging more because you didn't get to use my answer against me.
You're gaslighting or you're dumb. Either way go away, you're not trying to be productive you're trying to be annoying and gross what?! Mission successful you're a troll, good job.
Asking someone for an example of a scenario is different from asking them whether they believe such a scenario exists.
So, let's try this again.
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
- assess an interaction she had with a man,
- deem his behaviour to be "misogynistic",
- not be a sexist herself?