GenAI website goes dark after explicit fakes exposed
-
Clearly drawn is hard to prosecute (and one might argue shouldn't be prosecuted, since obscenity laws are just... weird). However, the stuff that is photorealistic can be treated, legally, like the real thing.
That's interesting and led me down a wikipedia rabbit hole. So the law in the US says that fictional child pornography (i.e., where it is drawn and this is not "indistinguishable" from a minor) is illegal if it is "obscene." And the definition of "obscene" essentially comes down to "would the average member of the community find it offensive."
That takes "grey area" to a whole new level.
-
I think that's exactly what they do. Curation at the quantities that they're working at would require an army.
So you think to train AI you just show it random images without describing what they represent and AI just magically learns? If I then ask AI to create an image of a computer, how does it know what a computer is? Does it just learn this on it's own from all the random images?
-
System shared this topic on