Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. US has struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Trump says, joining Israeli air campaign

US has struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Trump says, joining Israeli air campaign

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
40 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    Trump: "TIME FOR PEACE"

    Incredible thing to say after willingly choosing to attack someone. American hypocrisy at its finest.

    starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
    starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    punches you in the face and shoots your dog

    Woah buddy, now is the part where we stop fighting and call a truce!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • L [email protected]

      God damn America. We're such fucking scumbags dude. Fuck our imperialism.

      Look forward to further fascist policies domestically now. Anyone against Trump now is going to get labeled an enemy of the state during war time.

      We are so fucking dumb and bloodthirsty. This is just 2003 but somehow with an even dumber president and far far less allies.

      huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
      huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      "[...] four [countries] contributed troops to the invasion force (the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland). An additional 37 countries provided some number of troops to support military operations after the invasion was complete." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_of_the_willing_(Iraq_War))

      Far far less for sure. Although are quite some far right leaders in Europe right now. Perhaps Hungary and Italy are on their way already.

      L H 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • W [email protected]

        Dude on CNN talking about how “now we are looking for Iran to come to the table for diplomacy”.

        I just can't understand how someone can have such low self-awareness. We just seem to have pulled off an attack on Iran that likely dwarfs the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that pulled us into WW2. The idea that anyone would be remotely interested in peace talks after such an attack is just flabbergasting.

        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
        #16

        It's not that. They are forming a narrative for the American public's concent. It's not that Trump is dumb. It's not that the news media is dumb. It's that they think the American public is dumb (and they are).

        We aren't at the point of "we are a superior race and need to kill all these Muslims" yet. So we still attempt to justify our absolutely unjustifiable actions. At least to the dumbest people of American. That's who this is for. No one else.

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

          "[...] four [countries] contributed troops to the invasion force (the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland). An additional 37 countries provided some number of troops to support military operations after the invasion was complete." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_of_the_willing_(Iraq_War))

          Far far less for sure. Although are quite some far right leaders in Europe right now. Perhaps Hungary and Italy are on their way already.

          L This user is from outside of this forum
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          Yeah. My point is more so about how America is viewed by the rest of the world and it's Allie's today in comparison to Iraq. We are far far less respected. World's done with pretending to believe our lies.

          huppakee@feddit.nlH 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

            China also has relations with Israel, they will most likely try and remain neutral (or at least try to look that way) just like they're (acting as if they're) neutral in the war in Ukraine.

            L This user is from outside of this forum
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by [email protected]
            #18

            Yeah. You're not wrong. China has trade with everyone. It's why they always just "condemn" and then continue trading. My point is that at some point they will have to take action in defense of their Allie's at the US keeps escalating.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L [email protected]

              Yeah. My point is more so about how America is viewed by the rest of the world and it's Allie's today in comparison to Iraq. We are far far less respected. World's done with pretending to believe our lies.

              huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
              huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              I guess the countries sceptical or hostile back than didn't really have much reason to change their mind about us. But Trump sure did a lot of damage to the relationship with befriended countries, guess all he has left are strategic allies with a similar world view. But I guess that's what autocrats want after all. Who needs friends if you've got power. But for me personally, even though my view on american people didn't change much my desire to support them definitely increased. If i were to meet someone from the US tomorrow that person would likely get a better treatment from me than if I had met him a few years ago. Not that i feel sorry for them or anything, but i just am really glad im not in their shoes. Had a colleague from Russia years ago, who left a hostile nation behind. Think I'd feel similarly for someone migrating from the US.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

                I guess the countries sceptical or hostile back than didn't really have much reason to change their mind about us. But Trump sure did a lot of damage to the relationship with befriended countries, guess all he has left are strategic allies with a similar world view. But I guess that's what autocrats want after all. Who needs friends if you've got power. But for me personally, even though my view on american people didn't change much my desire to support them definitely increased. If i were to meet someone from the US tomorrow that person would likely get a better treatment from me than if I had met him a few years ago. Not that i feel sorry for them or anything, but i just am really glad im not in their shoes. Had a colleague from Russia years ago, who left a hostile nation behind. Think I'd feel similarly for someone migrating from the US.

                L This user is from outside of this forum
                L This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                Unpopular opinion. But we'd be here if Trump was never elected. The US has wanted reason to invade Iran for decades. Trump definitely does damage to America's image. But, as far the the third world's image of America, no one did more damage than Biden did with his Genocide of Gaza.

                The main point being. US imperialism is not directed by the president alone. It is directed by Americas defense industry and military industrial complex. I think the main difference between Trump or a Biden/Harris would be the aesthetics. And maybe going through the steps of Congress. But this war is what Imperialism is demanding.

                N huppakee@feddit.nlH eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE 3 Replies Last reply
                1
                • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

                  In history class i regularly heard about people leaving warmongering countries, not as refugees but as economic migrants. I don't know your personal situation, but this is a friendly reminder it is possible you end up regretting you stayed. There might not be a better time to leave.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Unfortunately, those with the material means to be able to move them and their family to another country are the ones least likely needing to do that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sayjess@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS [email protected]

                    Someone needs to take out that regime. A decapitation strike. Not talking about Iran.

                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Someone has to.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L [email protected]

                      Unpopular opinion. But we'd be here if Trump was never elected. The US has wanted reason to invade Iran for decades. Trump definitely does damage to America's image. But, as far the the third world's image of America, no one did more damage than Biden did with his Genocide of Gaza.

                      The main point being. US imperialism is not directed by the president alone. It is directed by Americas defense industry and military industrial complex. I think the main difference between Trump or a Biden/Harris would be the aesthetics. And maybe going through the steps of Congress. But this war is what Imperialism is demanding.

                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Exactly. There's a reason Dem leadership isn't condemning this.

                      eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L [email protected]

                        Unpopular opinion. But we'd be here if Trump was never elected. The US has wanted reason to invade Iran for decades. Trump definitely does damage to America's image. But, as far the the third world's image of America, no one did more damage than Biden did with his Genocide of Gaza.

                        The main point being. US imperialism is not directed by the president alone. It is directed by Americas defense industry and military industrial complex. I think the main difference between Trump or a Biden/Harris would be the aesthetics. And maybe going through the steps of Congress. But this war is what Imperialism is demanding.

                        huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
                        huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        I agree, the us' imperialism is driven by a lot more than just a few individuals at the top. The 'aesthetics' would likely have kept a lot more allies on board. But the biggest change I see is how the powers driving the country are not only hurting a lot of people outside of the US (which goes for most developed countries), but is also more and more hurting people inside the US (similar to oppression in autocratic countries).

                        As far as the war in Iran goes I'm not so sure, if Democrats would have continuously stayed in power, the deal would most likely be up. But then the defense industry would still push for war somewhere else, so who knows what the world would have looked like. I'm not convinced it would look better.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

                          In history class i regularly heard about people leaving warmongering countries, not as refugees but as economic migrants. I don't know your personal situation, but this is a friendly reminder it is possible you end up regretting you stayed. There might not be a better time to leave.

                          watson387@sopuli.xyzW This user is from outside of this forum
                          watson387@sopuli.xyzW This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          I would love to but there's no way i could afford to get out.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C [email protected]

                            Trump's getting closer to being able to launch the nuke he wanted to in his first presidency. How exciting for him.

                            L This user is from outside of this forum
                            L This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            Fallout, but we aren't ready yet. Where is Valt-Tec when you need them?

                            oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L [email protected]

                              Unpopular opinion. But we'd be here if Trump was never elected. The US has wanted reason to invade Iran for decades. Trump definitely does damage to America's image. But, as far the the third world's image of America, no one did more damage than Biden did with his Genocide of Gaza.

                              The main point being. US imperialism is not directed by the president alone. It is directed by Americas defense industry and military industrial complex. I think the main difference between Trump or a Biden/Harris would be the aesthetics. And maybe going through the steps of Congress. But this war is what Imperialism is demanding.

                              eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                              eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              “As Commander in Chief, I will ensure America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world.”

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N [email protected]

                                Exactly. There's a reason Dem leadership isn't condemning this.

                                eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                                eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                Why would they? AIPAC wants this and funds both sides to they always get what they want.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L [email protected]

                                  Fallout, but we aren't ready yet. Where is Valt-Tec when you need them?

                                  oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  I’d prefer nothing over Vault-Tec to be fair

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L [email protected]

                                    China needs to start caring about how these actions from the US are threatening it's own stability. I don't want war with China. But there is a point where they will be forced to take actual action to defend their allies. And that's what the US is banking on. They want world war. This is another step towards that.

                                    mlg@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mlg@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    China doesn't want to make the same mistake as the USSR which is expending geopolitical power to maintain an entire hegemony against the USA. They're content with making money and don't spend a lot of energy keeping extreme espionage on every country like the USA does.

                                    China knows the US will take the military option if confronted, which is to their disadvantage, so they'll find every alternative path or method.

                                    Biggest example is Pakistan. Its a massive CPEC project and defense partner, yet the military leadership in charge is basically a US lapdog because China knows if they try to pull the same regime change shenanigans, its just gonna end up like USSR vs USA 2 with a crap ton of proxy wars everywhere.

                                    I think their longterm goal is to just slowly erode at the global economy. Even if the US owns the regime in the country, a significant portion of money will be going to China. They could choose to eventually use that power to reinforce their allies, but I think that's still like 20+ years down the line.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO [email protected]

                                      I’d prefer nothing over Vault-Tec to be fair

                                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      At least you could die to really sadistic experiments instead of ghouling on the surface.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sayjess@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS [email protected]

                                        Someone needs to take out that regime. A decapitation strike. Not talking about Iran.

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        The entire US government is behind these attacks, the dems aren't even pushing back in the slightest

                                        sayjess@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                          #33

                                          Yeah. American foreign policy is always bipartisan. How they decide to spin it is the only difference between parties.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups