Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Kid gave a reasonable answer without all the math bullshit

Kid gave a reasonable answer without all the math bullshit

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
165 Posts 112 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R [email protected]

    I understand fractions, I simply doubt their utility.

    K This user is from outside of this forum
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #155

    For example, they allow you to write

    1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1

    Which is not possible in decimal

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K [email protected]

      For example, they allow you to write

      1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1

      Which is not possible in decimal

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #156

      well, no, it's understood that a third is .333 to infinity, so .333+.333+.333 does equal 1 for any use not requiring precision to the point of it mattering that it was actually .33333335 when measured.

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J [email protected]

        well, no, it's understood that a third is .333 to infinity, so .333+.333+.333 does equal 1 for any use not requiring precision to the point of it mattering that it was actually .33333335 when measured.

        K This user is from outside of this forum
        K This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #157

        No. You wrote .333

        If you want to precisely write to infinity you write 1/3.

        actually .33333335

        Holy fuck. Where did that 5 come from?

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K [email protected]

          No. You wrote .333

          If you want to precisely write to infinity you write 1/3.

          actually .33333335

          Holy fuck. Where did that 5 come from?

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #158

          It came from it not being actually .333 to infinity when measured in the required engineering precision i was talking about. It's literally a "common use" mathematical convention (you clearly are unaware of) that three times .333 is one. Solves a lot of problems due to a failure of the notation.

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J [email protected]

            It came from it not being actually .333 to infinity when measured in the required engineering precision i was talking about. It's literally a "common use" mathematical convention (you clearly are unaware of) that three times .333 is one. Solves a lot of problems due to a failure of the notation.

            K This user is from outside of this forum
            K This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #159

            3 times 0.333 is 0.999 not 1.

            Saying it equals 1 may be a common engineering convention, but it is mathematically incorrect.

            There is no failure of notation if fractions are used, which is why I gave this example of usefulness.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K [email protected]

              3 times 0.333 is 0.999 not 1.

              Saying it equals 1 may be a common engineering convention, but it is mathematically incorrect.

              There is no failure of notation if fractions are used, which is why I gave this example of usefulness.

              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #160

              You knows when a person informs you of a convention people use to solve a problem created by notation, you could just fucking learn instead of arguing stupidity.

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J [email protected]

                You knows when a person informs you of a convention people use to solve a problem created by notation, you could just fucking learn instead of arguing stupidity.

                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #161

                Your chosen notation solves nothing. Try Representing 3227/555 using 4 trailing dots.

                I started here by showing how fractions are useful.

                You are the ignorant aggressor, trying to fight centuries of mathematicians by claiming decimals are always better.

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K [email protected]

                  Your chosen notation solves nothing. Try Representing 3227/555 using 4 trailing dots.

                  I started here by showing how fractions are useful.

                  You are the ignorant aggressor, trying to fight centuries of mathematicians by claiming decimals are always better.

                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #162

                  do...do you even know where you are right now?

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J [email protected]

                    do...do you even know where you are right now?

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #163

                    Same place as you, doing the same thing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M [email protected]
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                      #164

                      This reminds me of a much more reasonable bad teacher from my childhood, which I still remember as unfair

                      We had been learning the vowels, which in one thing were listed as a, e, i, o, u, and sometimes y, among others with the just the five most common ones

                      So days later when we had a quiz my answer to which letters are vowels was a, e, i, o, u, and sometimes y. I got a red x, with "and sometimes y" crossed out. I don't think we were given points but it felt like zero points.

                      I wonder if this is an actual child being taught not to trust questions or someone implementing the idea of get internet points by typing a question, writing a childlike a correct answer, then writing in pen a bad teacher response

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T [email protected]

                        I've never seen so many people who are proud that they don't understand an elementary-school level math, this is hilarious.

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                        #165

                        We understand the INTENT of the question. The problem is as it is stated, the question does not limit the domain of correct answers to only what the teacher wants.

                        Now please... get your head out of your ass and develop better logic skills.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups