China, Japan, South Korea will jointly respond to US tariffs, Chinese state media says
-
Summary
China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.
The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."
The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.
They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.
Can you imagine a world without the US?
-
And achieved by Trump, on accident!
Whoopsie!
He truely is a stable genius /s
-
Got disillusioned with shit back around ‘99 or so, got tired of rotwing arrogant ignorance, and having lived in a former Soviet republic for several years decide that the US needed its comeuppance. Now I get to watch it all happen. Maybe a good ole fashioned occupation by another country will finally break the backs of the ignorant and lazy for a while.
There isn't a country in the world that could occupy the US. The best option for the word is to just separate us like a cancer, and just forget the US exists like a "dead zone" or something.
-
Summary
China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.
The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."
The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.
They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.
The idiot America managed to get the asian countries that hate each other to work together.
-
There isn't a country in the world that could occupy the US. The best option for the word is to just separate us like a cancer, and just forget the US exists like a "dead zone" or something.
Theoretically Canada and Mexico could both lets say China use them as a staging point. Us would in my opinion fall in a few days and the US is actually doing its best to aggro all three of them.
-
Summary
China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.
The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."
The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.
They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.
China, Japan, and South Korea? That's hilarious. From Mexican standoff to group hug.
-
Theoretically Canada and Mexico could both lets say China use them as a staging point. Us would in my opinion fall in a few days and the US is actually doing its best to aggro all three of them.
Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.
- US would have home field advantage.
- US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
- the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
- China still can't really project power yet.
5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.
It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.
-
Summary
China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.
The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."
The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.
They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.
Ah yes, JDPON Don giving us the Chinese Century of Prosperity
-
Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.
- US would have home field advantage.
- US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
- the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
- China still can't really project power yet.
5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.
It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.
It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.
Yep, hang back and watch as ramped corruption takes hold and guts the American military (Along with everything else), just at it gutted the Russian military (And society).
-
It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.
Yep, hang back and watch as ramped corruption takes hold and guts the American military (Along with everything else), just at it gutted the Russian military (And society).
Plus we'll be fighting ourselves. If someone invades, we're fighting them.
-
Can you imagine a world without the US?
-
The US is just the most "successful" product of European colonialism and imperialism after all.
-
Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.
- US would have home field advantage.
- US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
- the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
- China still can't really project power yet.
5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.
It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.
All the US guns in circulation I thinkwould be useless against actual military weapons/vehicle's is my thought it would be air strikes against a guy with a rifle. (maybe hit and run tactics after the fact red dawn style they'd be of more use).
Yeah it's big but missiles and artillery have stupid ranges now and the Chinese really aren't lacking in numbers.
The advantages I'd give the US are the F22 should be better than any fighter China has but the J-20 isn't that far away so it's a numbers thing.
Also it would be very hard to move that amount of troops and equipment without the US catching on but not impossible, shipping containers could probably do it.
Last advantage is I don't think China would have any interest in actually invading the US they'd just sell their dollar stockpile if they wanted to do serious damage.
-
All the US guns in circulation I thinkwould be useless against actual military weapons/vehicle's is my thought it would be air strikes against a guy with a rifle. (maybe hit and run tactics after the fact red dawn style they'd be of more use).
Yeah it's big but missiles and artillery have stupid ranges now and the Chinese really aren't lacking in numbers.
The advantages I'd give the US are the F22 should be better than any fighter China has but the J-20 isn't that far away so it's a numbers thing.
Also it would be very hard to move that amount of troops and equipment without the US catching on but not impossible, shipping containers could probably do it.
Last advantage is I don't think China would have any interest in actually invading the US they'd just sell their dollar stockpile if they wanted to do serious damage.
The US also has the first and second biggest air forces.
-
System shared this topic on
