Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. China, Japan, South Korea will jointly respond to US tariffs, Chinese state media says

China, Japan, South Korea will jointly respond to US tariffs, Chinese state media says

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
30 Posts 25 Posters 98 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

    Summary

    China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.

    The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."

    The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.

    They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    The idiot America managed to get the asian countries that hate each other to work together.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P [email protected]

      There isn't a country in the world that could occupy the US. The best option for the word is to just separate us like a cancer, and just forget the US exists like a "dead zone" or something.

      teknikal@eviltoast.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      teknikal@eviltoast.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      Theoretically Canada and Mexico could both lets say China use them as a staging point. Us would in my opinion fall in a few days and the US is actually doing its best to aggro all three of them.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

        Summary

        China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.

        The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."

        The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.

        They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.

        thebat@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
        thebat@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        China, Japan, and South Korea? That's hilarious. From Mexican standoff to group hug.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • teknikal@eviltoast.orgT [email protected]

          Theoretically Canada and Mexico could both lets say China use them as a staging point. Us would in my opinion fall in a few days and the US is actually doing its best to aggro all three of them.

          P This user is from outside of this forum
          P This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.

          1. US would have home field advantage.
          2. US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
          3. the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
          4. China still can't really project power yet.
            5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.

          It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

          F teknikal@eviltoast.orgT 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

            Summary

            China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.

            The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."

            The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.

            They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            Ah yes, JDPON Don giving us the Chinese Century of Prosperity

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P [email protected]

              Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.

              1. US would have home field advantage.
              2. US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
              3. the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
              4. China still can't really project power yet.
                5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.

              It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

              Yep, hang back and watch as ramped corruption takes hold and guts the American military (Along with everything else), just at it gutted the Russian military (And society).

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F [email protected]

                It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

                Yep, hang back and watch as ramped corruption takes hold and guts the American military (Along with everything else), just at it gutted the Russian military (And society).

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Plus we'll be fighting ourselves. If someone invades, we're fighting them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S [email protected]

                  Can you imagine a world without the US?

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Europe also bears much of the blame for the situation in the Middle East.

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Guest

                    Europe also bears much of the blame for the situation in the Middle East.

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    The US is just the most "successful" product of European colonialism and imperialism after all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P [email protected]

                      Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.

                      1. US would have home field advantage.
                      2. US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
                      3. the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
                      4. China still can't really project power yet.
                        5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.

                      It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

                      teknikal@eviltoast.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                      teknikal@eviltoast.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      All the US guns in circulation I thinkwould be useless against actual military weapons/vehicle's is my thought it would be air strikes against a guy with a rifle. (maybe hit and run tactics after the fact red dawn style they'd be of more use).

                      Yeah it's big but missiles and artillery have stupid ranges now and the Chinese really aren't lacking in numbers.

                      The advantages I'd give the US are the F22 should be better than any fighter China has but the J-20 isn't that far away so it's a numbers thing.

                      Also it would be very hard to move that amount of troops and equipment without the US catching on but not impossible, shipping containers could probably do it.

                      Last advantage is I don't think China would have any interest in actually invading the US they'd just sell their dollar stockpile if they wanted to do serious damage.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • teknikal@eviltoast.orgT [email protected]

                        All the US guns in circulation I thinkwould be useless against actual military weapons/vehicle's is my thought it would be air strikes against a guy with a rifle. (maybe hit and run tactics after the fact red dawn style they'd be of more use).

                        Yeah it's big but missiles and artillery have stupid ranges now and the Chinese really aren't lacking in numbers.

                        The advantages I'd give the US are the F22 should be better than any fighter China has but the J-20 isn't that far away so it's a numbers thing.

                        Also it would be very hard to move that amount of troops and equipment without the US catching on but not impossible, shipping containers could probably do it.

                        Last advantage is I don't think China would have any interest in actually invading the US they'd just sell their dollar stockpile if they wanted to do serious damage.

                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        The US also has the first and second biggest air forces.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • System shared this topic on
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups