Israel threatens Iran’s top leader after missiles damage hospital and wound more than 200
-
I mean...
Honestly the whole "assassinating a leader is against the rules" has always felt ass backwards when the alternative is a shit ton of people with essentially no say in the conflict dying.
Let me take it back to Hammarubi.
All these shitty world leaders can just take turns killing themselves like the bloody Sneeches, until we eventually end up with leaders who think peace is worth a shot.
To me, that sounds like a self correcting and sustainable system. If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
The problem with assassinating leaders is that it turns the population into a headless mob, and plenty of innocents suffer tremendously anyways.
Modern military technology has made such concerns much less important, as any conflict is increasingly devastating.
-
I mean...
Honestly the whole "assassinating a leader is against the rules" has always felt ass backwards when the alternative is a shit ton of people with essentially no say in the conflict dying.
Let me take it back to Hammarubi.
All these shitty world leaders can just take turns killing themselves like the bloody Sneeches, until we eventually end up with leaders who think peace is worth a shot.
To me, that sounds like a self correcting and sustainable system. If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
So you’re saying that Netanyahu is a legit target for the Iranians?
-
I mean...
Honestly the whole "assassinating a leader is against the rules" has always felt ass backwards when the alternative is a shit ton of people with essentially no say in the conflict dying.
Let me take it back to Hammarubi.
All these shitty world leaders can just take turns killing themselves like the bloody Sneeches, until we eventually end up with leaders who think peace is worth a shot.
To me, that sounds like a self correcting and sustainable system. If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
You will end up with leaders that will not meet each other or leave their countries. You will end up with leaders eternally paranoid that at any moment they could be assassinated by a foreign power.
This will be a guarantee for much more wars, killing many more people than we already have.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It's not like iranians leaders don't expect to be murdered. I am sure they have plan for replacements which may be smarter than thr current ones
-
So you’re saying that Netanyahu is a legit target for the Iranians?
The only reasons I can see that monster is still breathing is the power vacuum left behind would make the situation worse, and the US would royally fuck anyone who tried it.
-
I mean...
Honestly the whole "assassinating a leader is against the rules" has always felt ass backwards when the alternative is a shit ton of people with essentially no say in the conflict dying.
Let me take it back to Hammarubi.
All these shitty world leaders can just take turns killing themselves like the bloody Sneeches, until we eventually end up with leaders who think peace is worth a shot.
To me, that sounds like a self correcting and sustainable system. If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
Solve it the Klingon way: trial by personal combat.
-
I mean...
Honestly the whole "assassinating a leader is against the rules" has always felt ass backwards when the alternative is a shit ton of people with essentially no say in the conflict dying.
Let me take it back to Hammarubi.
All these shitty world leaders can just take turns killing themselves like the bloody Sneeches, until we eventually end up with leaders who think peace is worth a shot.
To me, that sounds like a self correcting and sustainable system. If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
"Leaders can have a little assassination, as a treat"
Not too often, just enough to remind them of their humanity.
If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
Depends on who's stronger. I don't think it's gonna lead to stability every time, unless the leaders realize it's better (read: profitable) to be at peace.
-
"Leaders can have a little assassination, as a treat"
Not too often, just enough to remind them of their humanity.
If a country's government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc'd by the government of the country they attacked.
Depends on who's stronger. I don't think it's gonna lead to stability every time, unless the leaders realize it's better (read: profitable) to be at peace.
Depends on who’s stronger.
Now it depends on who is willing to throw enough bodies thru a meat grinder, bomb civilians, or nuke everything...
If assassinations on the table, none of that shit matters if you personally get killed before you order it used
Every aggressive country would prioritize personal defense and strategic assassination squads.
Which again, I'd see as an absolute win over thousands or even millions of people dying.
There's no down sound.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What if Israel and the Zionists didn't commit genocide and initiate wars?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Tough getting a spoon of their own medicine. Although the mullahs claim they were actually targeting something nearby, while the IDF just claims every hospital, school, or whatever to be Hamas HQ.
-
Depends on who’s stronger.
Now it depends on who is willing to throw enough bodies thru a meat grinder, bomb civilians, or nuke everything...
If assassinations on the table, none of that shit matters if you personally get killed before you order it used
Every aggressive country would prioritize personal defense and strategic assassination squads.
Which again, I'd see as an absolute win over thousands or even millions of people dying.
There's no down sound.
What happens if one country invades the other which doesn't posses the tech necessary to kill the leader? eg cruise missiles, bunker busters, or modern aviation in general
-
What if Israel and the Zionists didn't commit genocide and initiate wars?
It'd actually be a nice tourist destination, food is great, glad I got to go many years ago in between murder campaigns.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Israel: You dare use my own spells against me.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Iran did what they have been doing in Gaza.
-
Israel: You dare use my own spells against me.
in a vacuum, if it was a dark comedy, it would be so funny how Israel complains about the things they have been doing non stop.
but it isn't, because the major countries are acting as if they believe what Israel says.
-
What if Israel and the Zionists didn't commit genocide and initiate wars?
it would still be apartheid
-
It'd actually be a nice tourist destination, food is great, glad I got to go many years ago in between murder campaigns.
it is still an apartheid state.
-
Wait, so bombing hospitals is bad??
- some dude at IDF right now
it's bad when Iran bombs hospitals because the IOF hides under them.
-
It's not like iranians leaders don't expect to be murdered. I am sure they have plan for replacements which may be smarter than thr current ones
they should do like Bibi and Ron away to Athens before the attack
-
This post did not contain any content.
Iran has the right to defend itself
