Apple refuses to break encryption, seeks reversal of UK demand for backdoor - Ars Technica
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
System shared this topic on
-
This post did not contain any content.
Uhhhh no, breaking encryption is exactly what they're doing.
-
Uhhhh no, breaking encryption is exactly what they're doing.
Explain please.
-
Explain please.
...they're removing encryption from iCloud
-
...they're removing encryption from iCloud
Providing something that is broken is very different from not providing it at all.
-
Providing something that is broken is very different from not providing it at all.
Right but...they did provide it. And now they're not. You wouldn't call removing that encryption "breaking"?
-
This post did not contain any content.
It's strange that everyone seems to forget that this already happened years ago in the US.
-
Right but...they did provide it. And now they're not. You wouldn't call removing that encryption "breaking"?
Not as it is conventionally used.
If you break a lock, that’s different from unlocking it and removing it.
-
This post did not contain any content.
They started out saying this for US too. Back in the day.
-
Right but...they did provide it. And now they're not. You wouldn't call removing that encryption "breaking"?
No, because if you know its not encrypted you behave differently than when you think it is.
-
No, because if you know its not encrypted you behave differently than when you think it is.
What does your behavior have to do with whether or not the encryption is broken?
-
They started out saying this for US too. Back in the day.
? the feature is still available in the US
-
What does your behavior have to do with whether or not the encryption is broken?
Social media doesn't do nuance.
No encryption was broken.
Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection. This is not the case.
Selling you a box to put your stuff in and selling someone else a locked box to put their stuff in doesn't mean Apple broke into your box. It means your big brother won't let you have locks.
-
Right but...they did provide it. And now they're not. You wouldn't call removing that encryption "breaking"?
No.
Users that do not decrypt their storage lose their storage permanently.
Users that decrypt their storage get to continue to use it, but it isn't not encrypted.No encryption is broken.
Users are swapping convenience for privacy. (Or privacy for convenience? Whichever way that is).Broken implies it is unusable or useless. As in "Apples encryption is unusable".
This is not the case. It's not broken. Users are given the option to remove the encryption to be able to continue to use the storage.Essentially: https://xkcd.com/538/
-
Social media doesn't do nuance.
No encryption was broken.
Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection. This is not the case.
Selling you a box to put your stuff in and selling someone else a locked box to put their stuff in doesn't mean Apple broke into your box. It means your big brother won't let you have locks.
Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection.
...is that not what they're doing?
-
Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection.
...is that not what they're doing?
No.
They disabled the ability for new users to use ADP.
If you use ADP, only you have the encryption keys. The UK wants Apple to keep a copy of the decryption keys.
There is nothing that can be done to data that is already protected by ADP. At worst Apple can delete it, or turn over encrypted data but there is nothing that is likely to exist in the next 100 years that can break the encryption (even hypothetical quantum computers).
As an interesting side note, if you use Windows and use Bitlocker to encrypt your hard drives while logged into a Microsoft account then Microsoft backs up your recovery key "for your convenience". They've produced these recovery keys for subpoenas.
That is what the UK wants Apple to do.
-
Uhhhh no, breaking encryption is exactly what they're doing.
Apple stopped providing encrypted storage, but they didnt unencrypt the existing storage for governments to see.
-
What does your behavior have to do with whether or not the encryption is broken?
Lemmy is not encrypted, my comments are public, your comments are public, we both know that. Anyone with a raspberry pi or an old netbook can scrape them.
If I use an encrypted service and all of a sudden everything that I thought was encrypted was decrypted by the service provider without my consent? That's breaking encryption.
If on the other hand I use an encrypted service and they tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data because of privacy invading government policies? That is not breaking encryption.
-
? the feature is still available in the US
They've assisted US law enforcement with phone access. An Apple whistleblower leaked that Liz Truss texted Anthony Blinken "it's done" 1 minute after nordstream pipeline explosion. US congressional pressure on tech has definitely put a shift away from "don't be evil" to "national security champions".
They are legally obligated to deny any cooperation with US government. I don't have proof that they provide access.
-
They've assisted US law enforcement with phone access. An Apple whistleblower leaked that Liz Truss texted Anthony Blinken "it's done" 1 minute after nordstream pipeline explosion. US congressional pressure on tech has definitely put a shift away from "don't be evil" to "national security champions".
They are legally obligated to deny any cooperation with US government. I don't have proof that they provide access.
This is the closest you'll get to proof I would imagine.
