Do you think he'll respond?
-
Last one that reached out to me, I asked if I got to wear corporate sponsors of war on my greens like NASCAR does, and they didn't reply.
It would just be General Dynamics repeatedly
-
This post did not contain any content.
I'm curious, how does one manage to get labelled a terrorist??
-
I'm curious, how does one manage to get labelled a terrorist??
Antifa
-
So, how do these scumbags even get your number?
Specifically for medical stuff, they swipe your number and email when you take the MCAT. I was debating an MD/PhD so I took it and even never applying or getting into med school they'd randomly email me, for like 5y after.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Those fuckers are desperate, so yeah probably.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Thank you for respecting William Clarks privacy
-
My number is on my PsychologyToday page and my NPI profile, so hopefully from there, but I wouldn't be surprised if they bought it from the university I went to or got access to a government database associated with my license
wrote last edited by [email protected]University is a lot more likely.
They like to prey on people desperate once the bills start rolling in.
-
Antifa
How dare you hypothetically terrorize innocent fascists!
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
Who*
"Whom" is an indirect object pronoun, not a direct object pronoun.
-
Who*
"Whom" is an indirect object pronoun, not a direct object pronoun.
Pronouns! Whom is correct here.
Who / whom works like He / him —
“The Trump administration attempted to label him a terrorist.”
“The Trump administration attempted to label whom a terrorist?”
“He is the person whom the Trump administration attempted to label a terrorist.”
-
Who*
"Whom" is an indirect object pronoun, not a direct object pronoun.
On direct vs indirect object, I’ve heard that before but it doesn’t make sense. None of the other pronouns in English work that way.
Best supporting authority I could find in 15 seconds of looking was Merriam Webster.
-
Didn't wanna get in trouble; that's also why I cropped off the part that said "+13525199190"
wrote last edited by [email protected]If you keep being such a privacy respecting king, I'll build you a guillotine on reflex and have really complicated thoughts about making a facebook account.
-
I'm curious, how does one manage to get labelled a terrorist??
Fight terrorists. Say mean things about terrorists. Feed homeless people.
-
It would just be General Dynamics repeatedly
That's not true. There's plenty of corporate citizens who support our wars!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Life hack: I told them I was a conscientious objector when I was 18 and never heard from them again.
I was this 🤏 close to joining ROTC and thought real hard if I'd be willing to kill random strangers in exchange for tuition. The debt was worth it.
-
How dare you hypothetically terrorize innocent fascists!
I'd move the word "hypotetically" a bit further, so that it says:
"How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!"
There, now it's better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent
-
All I see is *******
wrote last edited by [email protected]Just looks like
::: spoiler spoiler
"Hunter2"
:::
to me. -
This post did not contain any content.
I'm just here to roast OP for their incredible job at censoring names.
-
I'm just here to roast OP for their incredible job at censoring names.
I like to think that was intentional.
-
I'm just here to roast OP for their incredible job at censoring names.
What do you mean? I can’t even read that it says
William Clark
