Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Games
  3. EA's Skate Gets Microtransactions Before Its Release Date

EA's Skate Gets Microtransactions Before Its Release Date

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Games
games
61 Posts 33 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • simple@lemm.eeS [email protected]

    Of course it does. We all saw it coming.

    H This user is from outside of this forum
    H This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Soon EA new game will be like old upgrades game you want the start button 5$ the setting button 10$ save slot that be a 30$ with 5$ more for all additionnal one

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? Guest

      The game is free to play. If cosmetics are the only micro transaction, that’s actually good.

      spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
      spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      Depends on the implementation.

      If the promotion of mtx.is jarring or overwhelming then even limiting to cosmetics sucks. If something ends and there are multiple click through screens encouraging players to by mtx and other ads within the game to buy the mtx it can become a chore to ignore. Even if gameplay itself is not impacted, the things that happen outside of gameplay can deag down the whole experience.

      An example would be those stupid unskippable season pass screens where the bar goes up slowly and it reminds you of what you didn't get becsuse tou didn't buy the season pass. A few seconds each time, sure, but it adds up and is clearly trying to goad you into spending money. That shit sucks even if it limited to cosmetics.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

        It really, really isn't. Guessing it's testing.

        As per the article, they're refunding all purchases at launch.

        It's a free to play game, there is absolutely nothing newsworthy about this. Path of Exile 2 just launched on early access with a bunch of microtransactions AND a paywall and people were absolutely delighted with it.

        spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
        spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        They are 'refunding' the virtual currency. I would bet at least some lf the items purchased during prerelease will cost more on release.

        But the main thing is they are basically trying the 'free to play' version of preordering, where they get your money before releasing a finished game.

        mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

          They are 'refunding' the virtual currency. I would bet at least some lf the items purchased during prerelease will cost more on release.

          But the main thing is they are basically trying the 'free to play' version of preordering, where they get your money before releasing a finished game.

          mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          The implicit perception of value in this comment is making my head spin. We all realize that in-game cosmetics aren't real, right?

          Also, yes, they are doing the free to play version of preordering. It's called Early Access and it's supposed to happen later this year. See also Path of Exile 2 and Baldur's Gate 3.

          People are working overtime to get their knee-jerk reaction to be retroactively justified here. The thing is, I would get being mad at this being a F2P game in the first place. I would get being mad at it being funded through microtransactions. Those are meaningful changes from the previous trilogy that I don't particularly care for.

          It's the being mad on the spot at a haf-misunderstood headline depicting something entirely unremarkable that rubs me the wrong way.

          spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

            The implicit perception of value in this comment is making my head spin. We all realize that in-game cosmetics aren't real, right?

            Also, yes, they are doing the free to play version of preordering. It's called Early Access and it's supposed to happen later this year. See also Path of Exile 2 and Baldur's Gate 3.

            People are working overtime to get their knee-jerk reaction to be retroactively justified here. The thing is, I would get being mad at this being a F2P game in the first place. I would get being mad at it being funded through microtransactions. Those are meaningful changes from the previous trilogy that I don't particularly care for.

            It's the being mad on the spot at a haf-misunderstood headline depicting something entirely unremarkable that rubs me the wrong way.

            spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
            spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            We all realize that in-game cosmetics aren’t real, right?

            Yes, but the unavoidable advertising of those cosmetics frequently drag down the experience when there are multiple click through screens and progress bars on battle passes the player didn't buy and a ton of other negatives that have nothing to do with whether cosmetics affect game play. Free to play frequently means 'annoying nag menus'.

            I happened to focus on getting their money early and calling a reset of their fake money a refund being misleading.

            It also happens that my experience with early access free to play was Multiversus, where they took a moderately OK early access game that added mtx, then went silent for months and came back as a trash version of the same game with even more mtx. This being EA I expect them to go even harder into the mtx at the expense of game play.

            mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • simple@lemm.eeS [email protected]

              Of course it does. We all saw it coming.

              ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
              ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Skater XL + Mods

              Z 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                We all realize that in-game cosmetics aren’t real, right?

                Yes, but the unavoidable advertising of those cosmetics frequently drag down the experience when there are multiple click through screens and progress bars on battle passes the player didn't buy and a ton of other negatives that have nothing to do with whether cosmetics affect game play. Free to play frequently means 'annoying nag menus'.

                I happened to focus on getting their money early and calling a reset of their fake money a refund being misleading.

                It also happens that my experience with early access free to play was Multiversus, where they took a moderately OK early access game that added mtx, then went silent for months and came back as a trash version of the same game with even more mtx. This being EA I expect them to go even harder into the mtx at the expense of game play.

                mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                You just made all that up. None of that is even tangentially related to the thing that actually happened.

                I mean, now we're arguing that this weird ploy to extract more money for cosmetics is probably going to harm gameplay (even though it's unrelated to gameplay) because a different game from a different company also had MTX which were also not related to the bad gameplay changes they made.

                I don't know what to argue there. It's entirely irrational.

                To be clear, it's not irrational that F2P games often push them in intrusive ways that are annoying. It's not irrational that Multiversus had a very weird history and a poor relaunch. But the way you're connecting those pieces along wiht a healthy dose of entirely disconnected preconceptions based on branding is completely off the rails.

                This is why this is so frustrating to me. People just want to be mad at things because some other things that are unrelated made them mad once and they want to just smear the anger a bit. It's pure mob mentality and I fully admit that it pisses me off in games as a proxy for how much of it informs modern society and politics in general. Which I guess I'm doing, too, a little bit. But still.

                spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

                  You just made all that up. None of that is even tangentially related to the thing that actually happened.

                  I mean, now we're arguing that this weird ploy to extract more money for cosmetics is probably going to harm gameplay (even though it's unrelated to gameplay) because a different game from a different company also had MTX which were also not related to the bad gameplay changes they made.

                  I don't know what to argue there. It's entirely irrational.

                  To be clear, it's not irrational that F2P games often push them in intrusive ways that are annoying. It's not irrational that Multiversus had a very weird history and a poor relaunch. But the way you're connecting those pieces along wiht a healthy dose of entirely disconnected preconceptions based on branding is completely off the rails.

                  This is why this is so frustrating to me. People just want to be mad at things because some other things that are unrelated made them mad once and they want to just smear the anger a bit. It's pure mob mentality and I fully admit that it pisses me off in games as a proxy for how much of it informs modern society and politics in general. Which I guess I'm doing, too, a little bit. But still.

                  spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                  spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  People just want to be mad at things because some other things that are unrelated made them mad once and they want to just smear the anger a bit.

                  Or maybe they are annoyed by the things they gave examples of instead of being some kind of crazy conspiracy.

                  mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                    People just want to be mad at things because some other things that are unrelated made them mad once and they want to just smear the anger a bit.

                    Or maybe they are annoyed by the things they gave examples of instead of being some kind of crazy conspiracy.

                    mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    But it IS a crazy conspiracy... theory. "Skate testing its MTX during an alpha means that they will be a scam at launch and/or impact gameplay because Multiversus also had MTX and that had a bad relaunch" is a complete non-sequitur. This is cavemen sacrificing goats to make it rain level of random event association.

                    So I have to conclude the emotional layer is what matters here. Being mad loudly online at a frequent punching bag with a bad reputation is sheer mob-induced dopamine and that's why that headline exists and why this conversation happens. And why social media exists and is killing liberal democracy, but that's probably beyond the scope of this thread.

                    spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

                      But it IS a crazy conspiracy... theory. "Skate testing its MTX during an alpha means that they will be a scam at launch and/or impact gameplay because Multiversus also had MTX and that had a bad relaunch" is a complete non-sequitur. This is cavemen sacrificing goats to make it rain level of random event association.

                      So I have to conclude the emotional layer is what matters here. Being mad loudly online at a frequent punching bag with a bad reputation is sheer mob-induced dopamine and that's why that headline exists and why this conversation happens. And why social media exists and is killing liberal democracy, but that's probably beyond the scope of this thread.

                      spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                      spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      Being mad loudly online at a frequent punching bag with a bad reputation is sheer mob-induced dopamine and that’s why that headline exists and why this conversation happens.

                      Or maybe they are a punching bag because of the things they repeatedly do, did you consider that?

                      It isn't like multiversus is the only one that did this. I clearly said they were an example of a larger trend.

                      mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                        Being mad loudly online at a frequent punching bag with a bad reputation is sheer mob-induced dopamine and that’s why that headline exists and why this conversation happens.

                        Or maybe they are a punching bag because of the things they repeatedly do, did you consider that?

                        It isn't like multiversus is the only one that did this. I clearly said they were an example of a larger trend.

                        mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        I did! And if this conversation was even remotely related to any of them I'd give it more consideration.

                        But people read "microtransactions in Alpha", which was clickbaity on purpose, did not read the game was free to play, which was hidden at the bottom of the article on purpose, and got mad anyway.

                        So proxy for the disintegration of public discourse it is.

                        spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

                          I did! And if this conversation was even remotely related to any of them I'd give it more consideration.

                          But people read "microtransactions in Alpha", which was clickbaity on purpose, did not read the game was free to play, which was hidden at the bottom of the article on purpose, and got mad anyway.

                          So proxy for the disintegration of public discourse it is.

                          spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          You keep acting like those are different concerns, but the reason for concern is the combination of mtx, free to play, and being in alpha.

                          mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                            You keep acting like those are different concerns, but the reason for concern is the combination of mtx, free to play, and being in alpha.

                            mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            What combination? The game was announced as F2P a while ago, it's been running tests for a while and was always assumed to have MTX. The only thing that changed is they will make the MTX live during a test run and then refund them, which is not particularly rare.

                            If you must know, it normally has as much to do with seeing how popular your ideas for cosmetics are as it does with testing that your commerce system works properly.

                            But none of that is what's sparking the fake outrage.

                            spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • simple@lemm.eeS [email protected]

                              Of course it does. We all saw it coming.

                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #41

                              Don’t give a crap that (or if) this is free, I’d still play Tony hawk over this every day of the week. Excited for new 3 release

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H [email protected]

                                Soon EA new game will be like old upgrades game you want the start button 5$ the setting button 10$ save slot that be a 30$ with 5$ more for all additionnal one

                                A This user is from outside of this forum
                                A This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #42

                                DLC Quest comes to mind. It's not even a parody anymore 😭

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

                                  What combination? The game was announced as F2P a while ago, it's been running tests for a while and was always assumed to have MTX. The only thing that changed is they will make the MTX live during a test run and then refund them, which is not particularly rare.

                                  If you must know, it normally has as much to do with seeing how popular your ideas for cosmetics are as it does with testing that your commerce system works properly.

                                  But none of that is what's sparking the fake outrage.

                                  spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #43

                                  So you refuse to accept that people mean what they say and feel the need to defend a for profit company by twisting any complaints into some kind of faked outrage conspiracy.

                                  Have fun with that.

                                  mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                                    So you refuse to accept that people mean what they say and feel the need to defend a for profit company by twisting any complaints into some kind of faked outrage conspiracy.

                                    Have fun with that.

                                    mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #44

                                    No, I am seeing what people say and how it relates to reality, then deriving conclusions from that.

                                    For instance, my conclusions just got significantly reinforced by the fact that you're framing my stance as "defending" the subject of built-in outrage because of what or who they are, as opposed to what they did.

                                    That's a meaningful part of that statement. Unintended, for sure... but meaningful.

                                    spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • simple@lemm.eeS [email protected]

                                      Of course it does. We all saw it coming.

                                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #45

                                      I hope when it's released you can turn off the MMO features and play solo. I just want to get high, bomb hills, and watch my dude get all of his bones obliterated like the good ol days. I don't need some clown decked out in a $100 dinosaur costume telling me I suck ass to heighten the experience.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mudman@fedia.ioM [email protected]

                                        No, I am seeing what people say and how it relates to reality, then deriving conclusions from that.

                                        For instance, my conclusions just got significantly reinforced by the fact that you're framing my stance as "defending" the subject of built-in outrage because of what or who they are, as opposed to what they did.

                                        That's a meaningful part of that statement. Unintended, for sure... but meaningful.

                                        spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #46

                                        I don't think interacting with your reality is very productive.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • simple@lemm.eeS [email protected]

                                          Of course it does. We all saw it coming.

                                          tattorack@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tattorack@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #47

                                          So, EA as usual.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups