Controversial Telegram Co-Founder Says He'll Leave $17 Billion Fortune to His 106 Children
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2)/Pavel-Durov-amfar-061925-2754e727080b40449b63b87ae84ce7a0.jpg)
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
So... the most standard thing ever?
-
So... the most standard thing ever?
You have 106 children?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
So if he has two more, do we have a cast for the next Suikoden?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Okay, can we get the facts straight OP?
Is it $17 billion or $117 billion?
The article says $17 billion, but you typed $117 billion in the post body...
-
Okay, can we get the facts straight OP?
Is it $17 billion or $117 billion?
The article says $17 billion, but you typed $117 billion in the post body...
Pavel Durov, 40, told the French outlet Le Point in an interview about his decision to allocate his fortune. He's worth about $17.1 billion, per Forbes.
The headline is correct, according to the article. Must have just been an oversight.
-
Pavel Durov, 40, told the French outlet Le Point in an interview about his decision to allocate his fortune. He's worth about $17.1 billion, per Forbes.
The headline is correct, according to the article. Must have just been an oversight.
I searched the text of the article for 117, zero results found.
-
I searched the text of the article for 117, zero results found.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Yeah. It's an oversight in the SEO summary. That wasn't me.
-
Yeah. It's an oversight in the SEO summary. That wasn't me.
Ah, gotcha.
-
This post did not contain any content.
By no means is having 106 children normal or sane. But now I have a legit answer when someone says, “Why would anyone need $1 Billion.” I can now say, “So each of my 100 kids can get $10Million in inheritance money.”
10mil is still “set for life” territory just with an added debuff of, “If managed and invested carefully”
-
By no means is having 106 children normal or sane. But now I have a legit answer when someone says, “Why would anyone need $1 Billion.” I can now say, “So each of my 100 kids can get $10Million in inheritance money.”
10mil is still “set for life” territory just with an added debuff of, “If managed and invested carefully”
Geneticists in a thousand years are going to have questions about a sudden boom in certain gene markers around this time if they don't have the added context of billionaires deciding they're the master race by virtue of being billionaires.
-
You have 106 children?
You don't?
-
This post did not contain any content.
That's not even a billion per shitty child. Fuckin' douche
-
This post did not contain any content.
So if one of his offspring were to kill another one of his offspring the murdering offspring's share goes up (along with all the other surviving offspring)? This sounds like a dangerous announcement.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Clickbait article. Overwhelming majority of his children are from sperm donation. Not many people would split their inheritance that way so that's good. There are far far shittier parents. I'm Not saying that he's a saint!
-
This post did not contain any content.
What a gross fucker
-
So if one of his offspring were to kill another one of his offspring the murdering offspring's share goes up (along with all the other surviving offspring)? This sounds like a dangerous announcement.
In fairness, offing someone means your share goes up less than 1%, making the risk-reward for murder math out beneficial for everyone.
However, if that 17 billion was split between two or three children, we might have the beginning of an Agatha Christie novel.
-
That's not even a billion per shitty child. Fuckin' douche
Come on now, it's not like he's made of money.
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
:::
-
So if he has two more, do we have a cast for the next Suikoden?
But none of them are cute anime kids. Zero stars, do not recommend.
-
In fairness, offing someone means your share goes up less than 1%, making the risk-reward for murder math out beneficial for everyone.
However, if that 17 billion was split between two or three children, we might have the beginning of an Agatha Christie novel.
1% is still 170 million.
