Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill

UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
348 Posts 216 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

    If they outlaw VPNs then all internet-connected businesses will flee and everyone will just move to the dark net. Then you’ve got a whole other problem.

    These ancient tyrants are in over their heads.

    L This user is from outside of this forum
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #191

    If they do outlaw it will likely be banned solely for non-business use for this reason alone.

    muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • W [email protected]

      "Safety" meanwhile these same mp's can't budget can't run critical public services like bloody hospitals.

      But don't worry, your thoughts and activity are policed.

      Democratic failure to prioritise and run a country at its finest on display for the world to see. The waste is astounding.

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #192

      We call this a waste of tax payer's money.

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

        If they outlaw VPNs then all internet-connected businesses will flee and everyone will just move to the dark net. Then you’ve got a whole other problem.

        These ancient tyrants are in over their heads.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by [email protected]
        #193

        Selfishly, I think this is great for I2P/Snowflake/Tor. The incoming legitimate traffic helps to protect its most vulnerable users.

        1 Reply Last reply
        14
        • D [email protected]

          I mean anyone can rent a server in Europe and install OpenVPN themselves. Hell, it doesn't even need to open OpenVPN, Wireguard works just as well and is basically undetectable.

          Eat shit, UK government, for real. Idiots think that by speaking the same language as US fascists they can have similarly dumb ideas.

          W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #194

          wireguard is not undetectable, even wireshark has a simple way to identify it, but there are more accurate ways

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • jabjoe@feddit.ukJ [email protected]

            Man in the middle can be part of it. It's just basically recording and sending stuff back. Generally I use WireGuard, but on unhygienic networks, were OpenVPN is warning about possible replay attacks, WireGuard doesn't work as well. Could be something else of course, but I've got one end. It's not constant or always.

            xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
            xthexder@l.sw0.comX This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #195

            Oh replay attacks, that makes a bit more sense. Honestly I've never been on such a poor network to run into that. I don't know your situation, but I'd be doing anything I could to get away from that ISP if they're actively manipulating your traffic

            jabjoe@feddit.ukJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • W [email protected]

              and now you have to pay lost of business taxes even if you don't have any income

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #196

              Unless things have changed massively in the UK in the last 5 years or so, in my actual experience you don't unless you make a profit.

              The yearly baseline costs of opening and operating a Limited company in the UK are pretty low (less than £100 if I remember it correctly).

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P [email protected]

                EU is about to do the exact same thing. Norway is the place to be. That's where I went - at least according to my ip address.

                no1@aussie.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                no1@aussie.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #197

                Norway is part of the Nine Eyes…

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S [email protected]

                  I have a Digital Ocean droplet in Amsterdam, runs OpenVPN server. $6/mo., no one sees my activity, haven't logged into it in years.

                  no1@aussie.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                  no1@aussie.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by [email protected]
                  #198

                  Netherlands is part of the Nine eyes. They know exactly what your activities are.

                  Whether they choose to chase you down is a different issue.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • xthexder@l.sw0.comX [email protected]

                    Oh replay attacks, that makes a bit more sense. Honestly I've never been on such a poor network to run into that. I don't know your situation, but I'd be doing anything I could to get away from that ISP if they're actively manipulating your traffic

                    jabjoe@feddit.ukJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jabjoe@feddit.ukJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #199

                    Ah, I see it. Sorry. Corrected.

                    It's not really an issue with OpenVPN as it seams to cope. It's the only time I use OpenVPN instead of WireGuard.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

                      If they outlaw VPNs then all internet-connected businesses will flee and everyone will just move to the dark net. Then you’ve got a whole other problem.

                      These ancient tyrants are in over their heads.

                      underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                      underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #200

                      The UK has long championed writing legislative checks that their emaciated state infrastructure can't cash.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      6
                      • T [email protected]

                        Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

                        "If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

                        tal@lemmy.todayT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tal@lemmy.todayT This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #201

                        "If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.”

                        When I was a kid, Reddit and general public Internet access weren't things, but I sure managed to get my hands on pornography. I'm pretty confident that even entirely killing Internet access isn't going to stop kids who want to get ahold of porn from getting ahold of it.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        11
                        • R [email protected]

                          Nanny state

                          underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                          underpantsweevil@lemmy.worldU This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #202

                          You're literally being Jimmy Salvile right now

                          ~ Guy who posed for photo ops with Salvile twenty years ago

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          5
                          • A [email protected]

                            It would have been smarter for the UK to mandate that every ISP must provide a family filter for free as part of their service. Something that is optional and can be turned on or off by the account holder but allows parents to set filters (and curfews) if they want. They could even require that ISPs require new signups to affirm if they want it on or off by default so people with families are more likely to start with it enabled.

                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #203

                            Crazy because every (isp provided) router I have used has these options. They probably aren't 100% correct all the time, but it would be good enough for children (even though you shouldn't rely soley on filters to replace watching your kid).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • T [email protected]

                              Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

                              "If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

                              frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                              frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #204

                              They can come and pry TOR from my cold dead hands lmfao

                              this law can eat shit. i ain't gonna dox myself and feed my personal info to companies. maybe they should take this as a hint that most people care about their privacy

                              if you don't want kids seeing NSFW stuff be an actual parent and don't raise your kids on the internet??

                              aussiemandeus@aussie.zoneA 1 Reply Last reply
                              23
                              • F [email protected]

                                So now it's not just TERF island but also nazi island.

                                frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #205

                                As a Brit I'm sorry for how embarrassing our country's authorities are becoming

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • W [email protected]

                                  "Safety" meanwhile these same mp's can't budget can't run critical public services like bloody hospitals.

                                  But don't worry, your thoughts and activity are policed.

                                  Democratic failure to prioritise and run a country at its finest on display for the world to see. The waste is astounding.

                                  frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #206

                                  it's both hilarious and sad how this is coming from a "please think of the children!!" perspective meanwhile gender affirming care for trans kids got banned pretty recently

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  7
                                  • T [email protected]

                                    Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

                                    "If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #207

                                    China Laughs Communistically

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • T [email protected]

                                      Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

                                      "If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

                                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #208

                                      This online safety bill is dishonest. This has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with money.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      16
                                      • W [email protected]

                                        "Safety" meanwhile these same mp's can't budget can't run critical public services like bloody hospitals.

                                        But don't worry, your thoughts and activity are policed.

                                        Democratic failure to prioritise and run a country at its finest on display for the world to see. The waste is astounding.

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #209

                                        This bill has nothing to do with safety. Safety is just the scapegoat here.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • softestsapphic@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                                          Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #210

                                          those two people who downvoted you can go eat a big bag of dicks.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups