Always there
-
which one was sticks and stones one
The one where people broke their bones
-
This post did not contain any content.
World War: The animated series
-
This post did not contain any content.
No WarWorld spin off with it's WaterWorld sequel?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Kinda weir not seeing a mention to moths in this post, coming from you.
-
Kinda weir not seeing a mention to moths in this post, coming from you.
The moths will be back, after this short break
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Can't wait for "War X", bet its gonna be lit
-
''The Great War' and 'The War to End All Wars'... am I a joke to you?
Those are just different release titles for the first one.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Prequel: napoleonic wars
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
The moths will be back, after this short break
“After these messages, we’ll be ‘light’ back!”
-
I'd punish you for praising it, but you had to watch it which it which is punishment enough
-
“After these messages, we’ll be ‘light’ back!”
Oh we're back, visit my profile for a look
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]
It's my favorite F & F movie, anyone who disagrees fight me
-
Pretty sure with the current ongoing conflicts, WWIII has already kicked off and we just haven't fully accepted it yet.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]I mean, if we're truly keeping count then I think we're up to WW5 at this point.
- WW3 = Cold War
- WW4 = War on Terror
- WW5 = America: The Nazi Years
-
This post did not contain any content.
You forgot “Sticks and Stones” which is the better title for WWIV
-
It's my favorite F & F movie, anyone who disagrees fight me
You think THAT'S an unpopular opinion? I personally think that they should never even have made the first one.
-
You think THAT'S an unpopular opinion? I personally think that they should never even have made the first one.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]People I know IRL who hate on the last few because they were so over-the-top; I think they're the best because they were so over-the-top.
So just driving under a truck, or drifting is cool, but jumping a building to blow up a helicopter with your car is dumb? Whatever.
-
People I know IRL who hate on the last few because they were so over-the-top; I think they're the best because they were so over-the-top.
So just driving under a truck, or drifting is cool, but jumping a building to blow up a helicopter with your car is dumb? Whatever.
Yeah, the best way to make a bad movie good is to make it into a farce*, whether on purpose or not.
Examples include: Crossroads, Commando, The Room
*though there are of course truly great (and usually criminally underrated) movies that were farces on purpose from the start
-
People I know IRL who hate on the last few because they were so over-the-top; I think they're the best because they were so over-the-top.
So just driving under a truck, or drifting is cool, but jumping a building to blow up a helicopter with your car is dumb? Whatever.
First one is like a time capsule of street racing and car culture of the moment. It was better because it was grounded in reality. The driving and stunts were cool because they were believable. The new stuff is just over the top action.
To each their own