Business school professors trained an AI to judge workers' personalities based on their faces.
-
Makes sense. How physiognomy was used in the 19. century was bullshit (skull measuring and whatnot) but the face is a display of your genetical base, your hormonal exposure the last few years and of your health currently. It's what i, as an Asperger, mainly use to predict how someone would react. Btw, that's why the face is important in dating.
Makes sense.
Sure if you know nothing about biology or "AI".
-
Makes sense. How physiognomy was used in the 19. century was bullshit (skull measuring and whatnot) but the face is a display of your genetical base, your hormonal exposure the last few years and of your health currently. It's what i, as an Asperger, mainly use to predict how someone would react. Btw, that's why the face is important in dating.
This just one scary side of AI.
The idea of corporate level integration of this stuff is straight out of Black Mirror.
We're right around the corner from the corpo AI keeping tabs on your pupil dilation as you read your emails. If we aren't there already.
-
Makes sense. How physiognomy was used in the 19. century was bullshit (skull measuring and whatnot) but the face is a display of your genetical base, your hormonal exposure the last few years and of your health currently. It's what i, as an Asperger, mainly use to predict how someone would react. Btw, that's why the face is important in dating.
Its also affected by which direction the sun hits your house from, your commute to work (if applicable) and what kind of diet you had when growing up.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Shitty title. Business school professors claim they trained an AI to judge workers' personalities based on their faces.
The article talks about why that is such a stupid and terrible proposal.
-
but the face is a display of your genetical base, your hormonal exposure the last few years and of your health currently. Btw, that’s why the face is important in dating.
Everything is a display of everything else affecting it.
You are in some sense correct.
But using statistical instruments requires deep understanding of how they work. The article hints at that too.
And you do use it the same way in social context, although subsconsciously.
My experience is very different. When I see faces on photos, I get a completely different impression than seeing their owners personally and talking to them. Including romantic context.
Also what’s attractive to you might not be for me.
-
Its also affected by which direction the sun hits your house from, your commute to work (if applicable) and what kind of diet you had when growing up.
Look, i'm an Asperger and use the same mechanism regularly, to guess how the person would react. It's not obscure and not bullshit. People just don't like that they are more transparent than they think.
-
Makes sense.
Sure if you know nothing about biology or "AI".
I do. Seems like you don't know enough.
-
but the face is a display of your genetical base, your hormonal exposure the last few years and of your health currently. Btw, that’s why the face is important in dating.
Everything is a display of everything else affecting it.
You are in some sense correct.
But using statistical instruments requires deep understanding of how they work. The article hints at that too.
And you do use it the same way in social context, although subsconsciously.
My experience is very different. When I see faces on photos, I get a completely different impression than seeing their owners personally and talking to them. Including romantic context.
Sure, you don't see traumata etc on the face. It's just a base estimate and some people are better in it than others.
-
Those who produce MBAs at it again.
I used to joke about, but there really is MBA-> fascism pipeline going on
-
I used to joke about, but there really is MBA-> fascism pipeline going on
When your education revolves around dehumanizing people and turning them into abstract numbers, it's not that far of a leap, unfortunately.
-
System shared this topic