Definitions
-
A sword by definition has a "pointed blade" accordingly any object with an infinitely long blade cannot be a sword. Rather, it's a blade ray.
it does have a point. look at the blade from the side.
pointy bit goes into the pizza.
-
Im not sure what defines a strike but im pretty sure you wouldnt thrust a pizza cutter. If we're being technical, it doesnt meet the whole definition.
I have used it this way to cut through some really crusty pizza.
strikes are possible.
-
it does have a point. look at the blade from the side.
pointy bit goes into the pizza.
Instructions unclear, pizza cutter stuck in pants and now I am circumferenced
-
Instructions unclear, pizza cutter stuck in pants and now I am circumferenced
Circumcized?
-
No that's a pretty finite length, even if you have to measure the atoms to do it.
It’s also not length but circumference.
-
This image makes me angrier than it should. Those 4 "right angle" designations are all lies. You cannot have a curved line attached to anything and call it a "right angle". It's not. Like, factually. I don't care if it's 2 feet long, or 200,000 miles, it will never be exactly 90°, which invalidates the entire thing.
-
This image makes me angrier than it should. Those 4 "right angle" designations are all lies. You cannot have a curved line attached to anything and call it a "right angle". It's not. Like, factually. I don't care if it's 2 feet long, or 200,000 miles, it will never be exactly 90°, which invalidates the entire thing.
OK. Walk in a straight line for a couple of metres and stop. Rotate left or right by exactly 90°. Now take a curved path in any direction.
Did you or did you not turn 90°?
-
Circumcized?
Circumnavigated
-
ah yes, ignoring that it should actuality be a polygon, implying a closed shape with straight sides much like this ignores the "weapon" and "used for thrusting or striking" parts of the definition.
not hard to make strange things fit a definition when you just ignore parts of it.
Let me introduce you to the Non-Euclidean surfaces to bend your concept of straight lines
-
OK. Walk in a straight line for a couple of metres and stop. Rotate left or right by exactly 90°. Now take a curved path in any direction.
Did you or did you not turn 90°?
That doesn't make the resultant diagram 90° at those vertices. That's just empiricist stupidity.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I have used a pizza cutter to cut more than one pizza. I have also wielded a sword, (Ren Fair and fought a dual), and cut pizza with it. I have also field dressed a couple of deer and cut a few pizzas, (along with apples and sandwiches) with a Victorinox Classic keychain pocket knife over the years.
Of the 3 pieces of cutlery, I find the Victorinox Classic to be the most useful.
-
This post did not contain any content.
That blade is not infinitely long unless you measure the same part over and over again.
-
A sword by definition has a "pointed blade" accordingly any object with an infinitely long blade cannot be a sword. Rather, it's a blade ray.
I was going to define this as an axe
-
Circumnavigated
If she's doing it right
-
This is not a parallelogram and is therefore not a square
-
That blade is not infinitely long unless you measure the same part over and over again.
Fr, what happened to 2πr?
-
That doesn't make the resultant diagram 90° at those vertices. That's just empiricist stupidity.
OK, then what angle is it?
-
But that's correct in the image there - they are perpendicular or as you in the US call it "level", they are all 90° and pweze pweze don't forget you're trying to be pedantic in a comments section of a stolen meme in a community called shitposting like just chill
wrote on last edited by [email protected]It's not pedantry, you just don't know elementary level geometry.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_angle
Right angles must be comprised of two straight lines, and by also by similar definition a curved line can't be perpendicular to fucking anything.
That angle can be 90 degrees at the point of intersection because of how angles in this case are measured but it is not a right angle or perpendicular. This why the definition of right angle is more complex than "a 90 degree angle."
-
This image makes me angrier than it should. Those 4 "right angle" designations are all lies. You cannot have a curved line attached to anything and call it a "right angle". It's not. Like, factually. I don't care if it's 2 feet long, or 200,000 miles, it will never be exactly 90°, which invalidates the entire thing.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]If it’s not a right angle, then what is it? Wouldn’t you just measure the angle between the tangent of the curve and the line? Working with the tangents is how you find the angle between two curves as far as I know. You say it will never be exactly 90 degrees, but it would be 90 degrees at exactly that point. That’s not a weird thing to say from a math perspective.
I think a bigger issue with this figure is that they’re using some internal and external angles for their count of 90 degree angles. (And that this is just a ridiculous twist on a square, lol.)
-
A sword by definition has a "pointed blade" accordingly any object with an infinitely long blade cannot be a sword. Rather, it's a blade ray.
Swords without a sharpened point had existed. You could only use them for cutting, not thrusting.
