If you had six colors or categories to analyze a legal decision, what would be a good system to break that down by?
-
wrote last edited by [email protected]
- argument for (+)
- argument against (-)/defense
- the law/policy/contracts
- events
- QUESTIONS
- findings of law
- findings of fact
Edit: i feel like it would be more efficient and effective to focus on plaintiff arguments and the FINDINGS OF LAW
-
- argument for (+)
- argument against (-)/defense
- the law/policy/contracts
- events
- QUESTIONS
- findings of law
- findings of fact
Edit: i feel like it would be more efficient and effective to focus on plaintiff arguments and the FINDINGS OF LAW
The moment you start declaring colors as decisions, you just declared the rainbow as racist. Can we just enjoy colors?
-
- argument for (+)
- argument against (-)/defense
- the law/policy/contracts
- events
- QUESTIONS
- findings of law
- findings of fact
Edit: i feel like it would be more efficient and effective to focus on plaintiff arguments and the FINDINGS OF LAW
It's because there are no bones in cheddar cheese.
-
- argument for (+)
- argument against (-)/defense
- the law/policy/contracts
- events
- QUESTIONS
- findings of law
- findings of fact
Edit: i feel like it would be more efficient and effective to focus on plaintiff arguments and the FINDINGS OF LAW
Its you! You're the one who ate all my edibles!
-
Its you! You're the one who ate all my edibles!
wrote last edited by [email protected]There is zero evidence to support that and you know if, ofherwise you wouldn't have ironically accused me —just now—...here today...
-
- argument for (+)
- argument against (-)/defense
- the law/policy/contracts
- events
- QUESTIONS
- findings of law
- findings of fact
Edit: i feel like it would be more efficient and effective to focus on plaintiff arguments and the FINDINGS OF LAW
wrote last edited by [email protected]-
440 nanometer wavelength blue
-
500 nanometer wavelength green
-
625 nanometer wavelength red
The combination of those three in various intensities should cover the human-visible colors. I suppose that one could use the remaining three to cover non-human-visible frequencies.
-
- argument for (+)
- argument against (-)/defense
- the law/policy/contracts
- events
- QUESTIONS
- findings of law
- findings of fact
Edit: i feel like it would be more efficient and effective to focus on plaintiff arguments and the FINDINGS OF LAW
Mare-Ih-Joe-Wah-Nah
