Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
-
You mean implementing a functionality with which users can block posts from certain URLs to show up on their feeds?
That's not something the admins can do. Ask the devs for that.
-
I thought this was the onion but its real...
It seems the mentality of the United States rulership have shifted back to the dark ages.
I wonder if accusing people of being witches is next.
"Land of the free"
-
Keep in mind that TSA searching peoples' phones was already policy under the last few administrations. Which is part of why I wasnt interested in traveling there even before the lunatic.
that's crazy honestly
-
I've been in Britain before, they didn't check my phone
And even if, a meme about someone in the UK government would also not get you denied entry.
-
That's not something the admins can do. Ask the devs for that.
Or educate yourself and learn to filter based on the source of the data. Doesn't mean the reporting is not factual but it may be embellished to serve a narrative.
-
That's not something the admins can do. Ask the devs for that.
That's why their comment above says "devs", not "admins" lol
-
That's why their comment above says "devs", not "admins" lol
wrote last edited by [email protected]Must have been edited. It did say admins before.
-
Keep in mind that TSA searching peoples' phones was already policy under the last few administrations. Which is part of why I wasnt interested in traveling there even before the lunatic.
That should be against privacy laws in some countries and considering you can sue people from outside the US into the US court because of US rules it would make sense to have it the same with that human rights form one country exist in other countries.
Sadly the world isn't built ontop of logic. -
Must have been edited. It did say admins before.
doesn't look like it, there's no ninja edits on lemmy afaik
-
You mean implementing a functionality with which users can block posts from certain URLs to show up on their feeds?
boost for reddit (and lemmy) has the option to ignore posts from certain domains. since I have no intention ever reading anything from the domains I mentioned, I'd appreciate it in the web version.
-
Keep in mind that TSA searching peoples' phones was already policy under the last few administrations. Which is part of why I wasnt interested in traveling there even before the lunatic.
I've been avoiding travel to the US since the Patriot Act that followed 9/11 started that kind of shit and more in general the US started moving away from Democracy and into Autocracy.
Last time I felt like traveling to the North American continent I just went to Canada instead for a whole month - sea kayaking in British Columbia, hiking in the Canadian Rockies, sightseeing in Quebec . Highly recommended by the way.
-
And even if, a meme about someone in the UK government would also not get you denied entry.
it would allow you entry
-
See - this is the thing with people going on about how its so oppressive in countries outside of "The West" where they will arrest people for insulting their king on Facebook or some shit.
We are no better. I'm not American but Britain does the same kind of shit. Read some declassified police case files, the cops pick on weird shit on people's phones.
Read some declassified police case files, the cops pick on weird shit on people's phones.
Care to link some?
-
it would allow you entry
Most likely.
"It says here you are a terrorist, but on your phone there's a really funny meme about Starmer, so I guess it's all fine."
-
doesn't look like it, there's no ninja edits on lemmy afaik
Sure there are. If you are on the web client, there's a three-dot-button below your comment. Press that and a popup opens up, where you can select "Edit" and there you go: ninja edit.
-
Whataboutism is not an argument. Also two things can be bad at once, this is not a zero sum game.
wrote last edited by [email protected]1: Whataboutism is a disputed fallacy specifically because dorks like you will screech about pointing out any form of hypocrisy even in discussions on comparative morality and ethics. It is in this manner its own form of thought terminating cliche.
2: What nation is this post about?
-
"My dad's genocide is more moral than your dad's genocide!"
wrote last edited by [email protected]That's why they have to put "cultural" in front of it, yeah.
Feel free to explain to a deliberately starved to death Gazan child who saw their dad killed in the street for his property by Israeli soldiers who posted it to YouTube why their situation is just as bad as a Uyghur kid going to a state run propaganda farm I guess.
-
Was worth digging through replies because I forgot about the username
wrote last edited by [email protected]Oh wow. Hahahaa
I swear to god, I forget how stupid people are sometimes.
And three people downvoted you. My man got receipts.
-
So you've got two genocidal states, one has healthcare (that actually does apply to Uyghurs because it's a cultural genocide/slavery thing not an extermination) and the other wants to start WW3.
Why is the first a shit hole comparable to America? They're clearly different tiers of fascist states. Everyone not a fascist state>China>Shitholes like America
I'm glad you thoroughly understand the concept of "the lesser evil"
-
I'm glad you thoroughly understand the concept of "the lesser evil"
wrote last edited by [email protected]There's no such thing as a lesser evil, just priorities.
When there's an evil I can do something about and see firsthand and evil I can't, I don't spend a whole lot of personal effort virtue signaling about the second type when the first is happening down the street.
