China is quietly pushing ahead with massive 50,000Mbps broadband rollout to leapfrog rest of the world on internet speeds
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Seems surprising, especially because Estonia is known for its digitized government. I logically thought that it'd be complemented with decent Internet coverage.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I just checked on eBay, and there are multiple listings for single port 100 GbE Mellanox (now nVidia) Connect-X 4 cards in the $60-100 range.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There's a bunch of places in the US that has 10 Gbps speed, so this jump to 50 Gbps is not too shocking. Writing it as 50,000 Mbps to make it seem huge is an interesting take.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We have roughly the same problem that the US has, where they've paid the big ISPs to put fiber everywhere and all that money got pocketed. Well, Estonia's first few big fiber projects were all through Telia. Telia put down way less fiber than promised and constantly kept saying the lines were already all committed so they couldn't rent it out to competitors.
This I believe started before we even had Telia here - We had Eesti Telekom, later known as Elion, and then finally it was acquired by Telia. The same company has had a semi-monopolistic status pretty much all the time. Tele2 and Elisa exist, but they've never had the sweet ass contracts Telia's always had.
This is slowly starting to change with the currently ongoing broadband project where you can get an ISP-neutral fiber connection installed for like 99€ or 199€, regardless of how much work it is to get the lines to you, but I'm not sure this is even available if you've already got Telia's monopoly fiber installed. It's very slow to roll out and every year or 2 they choose a bunch of municipalities with problematic Internet access and then if you live in one of those, you can apply. This has been a godsend, because it got me fiber at home, after years of only being able to get 12/1 mbps through Telia copper.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Also doesn't help that SMB is single threaded. Completely mismatched for the era of multicore processors and SSDs.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
We'll solve that with AI. Because you can solve anything by saying "AI".
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's entirely speculative. There are diminishing returns. Unless you're going to host your own YouTube, the use case for 50Gbps connections to the home is quite small. 4K video streaming at Ultra HD Blu-ray bitrates doesn't even come close to saturating 1Gbps, and all streaming services compress 4K video significantly more than what Ultra HD Blu-ray offers. The server side is the limit, not home connections.
Now, if you want to talk about self-hosting stuff and returning the Internet to a more peer-to-peer architecture, then you need IPv6. Having any kind of NAT in the way is not going to work. Connection speed still isn't that important.#
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How exactly does NAT prevent that? On good hardware it adds insignificant latency.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
/r/programming
There's your culprit
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It's not fast it's more of more bandwidth, means more people can be connected from one line. Speed will remain the same.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So I'm just going to be a completely different person once I have access to these speeds or you are suggesting new tech that will be made available to consumers?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
What about quantum computing? I don't want anything without quantum computing.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That goes without saying.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It has nothing to do with latency, and everything to do with not being able to directly address things behind NAT.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
My mistake, I was thinking 100Gb fiber. Even the knock off switch SFPs are hundreds of dollars each.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes but have you considered China bad?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can always hope it's better than it actually is.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Is China leading the world in green energy research and production an evil plot too?
I get it dictators are shit and we should kill them, but having a society where people's needs are met makes society easier to control. It's literally good for the CCP to make people's lives better so they don't get hung.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Those cables are hard to terminate properly. There's an outer grounding sheath that needs to be connected up at both ends. Except for short connections, I find it easier/cheaper to use fiber.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
640kb should be enough for anybody.