monthly challenge
-
they meant less than 500 steps a day
smh
Who writes it that way???
It’s read out "500 less than steps a day"
Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Eating expensive. Buying alcohol. Delivery because of the low steps/day.
I’m too broke for this.
Though… Is a drop of alcohol sufficient? Is watching at porn for a second sufficient? Is running an idle game for 5h sufficient? Does cycling, crawling or a wheelchair count for steps?
-
Already 5.5/7. Woohoo
And i am female... Doos that makes me male?Yes, you officially lost he iron.
-
The first two seem too loosely defined. Does it count if I just log on to e621.net, select latest/popular and then close the window down? Or do I actually have to watch porn and masturbate to completion? Does daily alcohol count if I drink a Bud Light, or make myself a fancy cocktail? Or do I need to get blackout drunk?
Toughest for me would probably be 5-8 hours of uninterrupted gaming (I don't have the attention span for it anymore) and running on 5 hours or less of sleep.
Toughest for me would probably be 5-8 hours of uninterrupted gaming
-
This post did not contain any content.
That's called middle age. You're on!
-
Who writes it that way???
It’s read out "500 less than steps a day"
Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
500 greater than steps a day.
-
This post did not contain any content.
That doesn't sound very healthy physically. But mentally? Yes!
-
This post did not contain any content.
If I get paid, fuck yeah I'm on it!
-
That doesn't sound very healthy physically. But mentally? Yes!
Mentally healthy? Since we have 2 kids I rarely sleep 8 hours, 6 is the new norm, and it's definitely not helping mentally. I still try to get 8K steps daily, doing 500 or less would make me even more miserable.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I wouldn’t last 24 hours.
-
Who writes it that way???
It’s read out "500 less than steps a day"
Favorite subject of them grammar not was.
technically the symbol is parsed as "greater than". So syntactically they are not wrong, but we are not accustomed to reading it like that
-
That doesn't sound very healthy physically. But mentally? Yes!
That's the trick though, especially as you get older. The stuff that sounds like an awesome relaxing reset and will surely be nice at the time, is not always the activity that will actually leave you feeling better afterwards.
A frustrating example is being tired in the middle of the day on a weekend when I wanted to be productive in my hobbies & house work. If I take a nap, will that save me evening or ruin my evening?
There's a lot of trial and error, since we're all different.
-
People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols
such as yourself you mean?
-
500 greater than steps per day
aka steps per day less than 500
I don't get why people have a problem with this
-
I think <500 steps a day is meant here.
Yes that's what they wrote in the OP
-
Eating expensive. Buying alcohol. Delivery because of the low steps/day.
I’m too broke for this.
Though… Is a drop of alcohol sufficient? Is watching at porn for a second sufficient? Is running an idle game for 5h sufficient? Does cycling, crawling or a wheelchair count for steps?
no, that's how you get around the limit
-
This post did not contain any content.
Completed it
-
500 greater than steps per day
It’s to give your heart a reason to have a heart attack.
If you can’t get any better, the only way to go up the leaderboard is to incapacitate your opponents.
-
such as yourself you mean?
Nope, it's wrong lol
-
It's a bit weird, but imo not wrong. 500 > steps/day or steps/day < 500 is the same. As long as the big end of the < or > is at the 500 it makes sense. It only doesn't make sense if you literally read 500 > steps/day as "five hundred greater than steps a day" instead of parsing it as math.
Only reason it's so jarring is the context has people parsing the whole list as language and they weren't expecting to have to abruptly parse a mathematical expression.
