AI crawlers cause Wikimedia Commons bandwidth demands to surge 50%.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
-
This post did not contain any content.
what assholes .. just fucking download the full package and quit hitting the URL
-
This post did not contain any content.
AI: The "pen that can write in zero gravity" when pencils exist.
-
AI: The "pen that can write in zero gravity" when pencils exist.
Well I get the analogy, but also I think they didn't use pencils because of the graphite and complications with filtering air or something.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Laws should be passed in all countries that AI crawlers should request permission before crawling whatever target site. I haver no pity to AI "thiefs" that get their models poisoned. F...ing plague, wasn't enough the adware and spyware...
-
what assholes .. just fucking download the full package and quit hitting the URL
Right‽ This is ridiculously stupid when you can download the entirety of Wikipedia in a single package and parse it to your hearts desire
-
Well I get the analogy, but also I think they didn't use pencils because of the graphite and complications with filtering air or something.
You may be right. It's just easier to get the sentiment across that way than expound about how it's ridiculously complex and overbuilt to achieve menial results.
-
Laws should be passed in all countries that AI crawlers should request permission before crawling whatever target site. I haver no pity to AI "thiefs" that get their models poisoned. F...ing plague, wasn't enough the adware and spyware...
An HTTP request is a request. Servers are free to rate limit or deny access
-
Well I get the analogy, but also I think they didn't use pencils because of the graphite and complications with filtering air or something.
Graphite is conductive. A short circuit and fire are Very Bad.
-
Graphite is conductive. A short circuit and fire are Very Bad.
Couldn't you just use a charcoal pencil or crayon instead?
-
Couldn't you just use a charcoal pencil or crayon instead?
Yes, but neither of those write as cleanly. And both are still prone to fragmenting, even if the fragments aren't conductive.
-
Right‽ This is ridiculously stupid when you can download the entirety of Wikipedia in a single package and parse it to your hearts desire
Not only that, but we make it goddamn trivial for not just Wikipedia but for other Wikimedia projects. Doing this is just stealing without attribution like the CC BY-SA 4.0 license demands and then on top of that kicking down the ladder for people who actually want to use Wikipedia and not the hallucinatory slop you're trying to supplant it with. LLM companies have caused incalculable damage to critical thinking, the open web, and the climate.
-
AI: The "pen that can write in zero gravity" when pencils exist.
Pen, pencil. Both are dangerous in the wrong hands.
-
Well I get the analogy, but also I think they didn't use pencils because of the graphite and complications with filtering air or something.
Also, all pens work in zero gravity. They don't rely on gravity to feed ink to the point, try writing on a piece of paper that's held against the ceiling and it works just fine.
-
Laws should be passed in all countries that AI crawlers should request permission before crawling whatever target site. I haver no pity to AI "thiefs" that get their models poisoned. F...ing plague, wasn't enough the adware and spyware...
i doubt the recent uptick in traffic is from “stealing data” for training but rather from agents scraping them for context, eg Edge Copilot, Google’s AI search, SearchGPT, etc.
poisoning the data will likely not help in this situation since there’s a human on the other side that will just do the same search again given unsatisfactory results. like how retries and timeouts can cause huge outages for web scale companies, poisoning search results will likely cause this type of traffic to increase and further increase the chances of DoS and higher bandwidth usage.
-
Also, all pens work in zero gravity. They don't rely on gravity to feed ink to the point, try writing on a piece of paper that's held against the ceiling and it works just fine.
Just tried it, and the ink stopped. There's no wick in it and apparently any capillary action is stopped by gravity. It wrote for a little bit for as long as there was enough ink sticking to the ball, but that didn't last more than a few sentences.
In zero gravity, since there's no gravity pulling the ink in either direction, a typical ballpoint pen would likely write inconsistently as the ink shifts in the tube from inertial forces, like a pen that's drying out.
-
This post did not contain any content.
To be clear, network costs represent a tiny fraction of WMF's expenses. Much of WMF's budget goes to social programs, not technical upkeep.
-
AI: The "pen that can write in zero gravity" when pencils exist.
This pen / pencil thing has been corrected so many times for so many decades that it's ludicrous people are still bringing it up.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-nasa-spen/
Random bits of pencil lead floating around in a high tech environment is such a poor idea that even the Soviet's quit using pencils once Fisher's Space Pen was available. A pen which Fisher itself paid to develop and then sold to both NASA and the Soviet Space Program.
-
Right‽ This is ridiculously stupid when you can download the entirety of Wikipedia in a single package and parse it to your hearts desire
-
i doubt the recent uptick in traffic is from “stealing data” for training but rather from agents scraping them for context, eg Edge Copilot, Google’s AI search, SearchGPT, etc.
poisoning the data will likely not help in this situation since there’s a human on the other side that will just do the same search again given unsatisfactory results. like how retries and timeouts can cause huge outages for web scale companies, poisoning search results will likely cause this type of traffic to increase and further increase the chances of DoS and higher bandwidth usage.
So? Break context scrapers till they give up, on your site or completely.