Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Palestinians starve as Israel continues full ban on humanitarian aid

Palestinians starve as Israel continues full ban on humanitarian aid

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
62 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N [email protected]

    Hamas are the good guys.

    In the fight against Israel. Let's not forget that they're still a brutal authoritarian regime that must go immediately after someone does something about Israel.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    I'd like to see you try to organize elections while bombs are falling from the sky and you don't even have food or drinking water lmao

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N [email protected]

      Months? More like decades. We're at more than half a century of this shit by now.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      I know, I'm talking about the 9 firsts month of 2023 since for these idiots it all started in october

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest

        I'd like to see you try to organize elections while bombs are falling from the sky and you don't even have food or drinking water lmao

        N This user is from outside of this forum
        N This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        Okay dude that's not what happened. If you want the end of Palestinian democracy you should be looking at the Gaza civil war, and while it was Fatah who moved to override the democratic process Hamas jumped at the opportunity to turn their government into an autocratic regime. There was no reason they couldn't hold elections in times of relative peace, or respect freedom of speech or do all that other democracy things.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N [email protected]

          Okay dude that's not what happened. If you want the end of Palestinian democracy you should be looking at the Gaza civil war, and while it was Fatah who moved to override the democratic process Hamas jumped at the opportunity to turn their government into an autocratic regime. There was no reason they couldn't hold elections in times of relative peace, or respect freedom of speech or do all that other democracy things.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          Fatah engaged in a coup, locking up elected officials. It succeeded in West Bank and failed in Gaa. Why should those remaining officials reconcile with the people who did that coup and openly took aid from Israel to topple that democracy?

          There were attempts to unify and move forward, but this is a thorny issue because they don’t trust one another. Meanwhile, Netanyahu took advantage of the division to steal more land and refuse peace negotiations .

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            I don't care much. They could be raping kittens and I would still support them. They're the only armed force of people who got bombed for 50 years.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B [email protected]

              Armed struggle != war crimes. One does not justify the other. The October attacks were like 5% achieving military objectives, the rest mindless slaughter, to the point where one can legitimately question whether the military objectives were not completely incidental. Hamas could have bee-lined for as many IDF outposts as they could, they didn't, they shot up Hippie Kibbutzim of all places.

              Same, of course, goes for the IDF and what they're currently doing.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              No. The attacks were originally aimed at a military base; they had no idea that a music festival was going on. The death count is roughly 300 soldiers dead and 900 civilians. By Israel’s own logic, this ratio of civilian deaths is acceptable in war. (I disagree which is why it’s wrong for both sides) Hamas claimed they were taking enemy fire from these locations, and by Israeli logic it meant that these Kibbutzim were now legitimate military targets. (Again, Israel has done this to Arab towns using the same rationale). Israel doesn’t like hoisted on their own petard.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B [email protected]

                May be the case, we'll probably see when the dust has settled. OTOH, it's still a war crime to abduct non-combatants so my point stands. And no, reservists aren't combatants.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #33

                it's still a war crime to abduct non-combatants

                And yet Israel has kidnapped thousands of Palestinian children and holding them without access to lawyers or contact by their families.

                There needs to be war crimes investigations and charges against both sides, and yet the US is sanctioning the international bodies that adjudicate this.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S [email protected]

                  Understandable, yes.

                  Predictable, yes.

                  Deserved, yes.

                  Effective, perhaps.

                  Excusable? No.

                  Are we really debating whether it’s okay to rape / kidnap / slaughter civilians?

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  Read this New Yorker interview of a Hamas leader. Palestinians tried everything the “right” way. They engaged in nonviolent protest and were shot by the IDF. They went to the UN and Israel called it “diplomatic terrorism” and sanctioned the PA. They offered deep concessions to move forward on a two state solution and Netanyahu refused with no counter offer. They called for new elections and were blocked. There was really no way to left to resist Israel peacefully.

                  “We rolled down all of the pathways to get some of our rights—not all of them. We knocked on the door of reconciliation and we weren’t allowed in. We knocked on the door of elections and we were deprived of them. We knocked on the door of a political document for the whole world—we said, ‘We want peace, but give us some of our rights’—but they didn’t let us in.” He added, “We tried every path. We didn’t find one political path to take us out of this morass and free us from occupation.”

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B [email protected]

                    May be the case, we'll probably see when the dust has settled. OTOH, it's still a war crime to abduct non-combatants so my point stands. And no, reservists aren't combatants.

                    queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
                    queermunist@lemmy.mlQ This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    Israel doesn't give a fuck about any of its people, whether they're civilians or soldiers. There'd be no difference if the kidnapped were all soldiers.

                    Also the thing about international law is it has to apply to everyone or it doesn't exist. Israel, by not following internatonal law, has forfeited its protections. Hamas simply followed the same rules of war that Israel does.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • queermunist@lemmy.mlQ [email protected]

                      Israel doesn't give a fuck about any of its people, whether they're civilians or soldiers. There'd be no difference if the kidnapped were all soldiers.

                      Also the thing about international law is it has to apply to everyone or it doesn't exist. Israel, by not following internatonal law, has forfeited its protections. Hamas simply followed the same rules of war that Israel does.

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      The going rate is 1:1027 for an NCO.

                      queermunist@lemmy.mlQ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I [email protected]

                        On Wednesday, the UN aid coordination office, OCHA, said in its latest update that Israel’s ban on entry of aid has continued for nearly a month and that no aid entered the enclave throughout this period. All requests by humanitarian agencies to coordinate access with Israeli authorities have been denied.

                        Helles recalled when the blockade was imposed. The shops were empty within hours, and what was left was too expensive, she said. Even the charity distributions, which once offered a variety of meals, have dwindled, now providing only small servings of rice at the time of Iftar.

                        After days of eating little more than rice, Huda couldn’t sleep at night, suffering from severe stomach pain and colic. She was diagnosed with a stomach infection two weeks ago.

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #37

                        After seeing how Hamas is torturing and executing Palestinians who protest against them, while Israel is bad they may as well share responsibility for this most recent conflict.

                        I 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Guest

                          After seeing how Hamas is torturing and executing Palestinians who protest against them, while Israel is bad they may as well share responsibility for this most recent conflict.

                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #38

                          Damn the IDF is executing Palestinians who protest against them?

                          Oh wait they did that in 2017 in broad daylight.

                          If only there was any evidence for Hamas doing it. The 4k projector must be on again.

                          ? 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S [email protected]

                            Read this New Yorker interview of a Hamas leader. Palestinians tried everything the “right” way. They engaged in nonviolent protest and were shot by the IDF. They went to the UN and Israel called it “diplomatic terrorism” and sanctioned the PA. They offered deep concessions to move forward on a two state solution and Netanyahu refused with no counter offer. They called for new elections and were blocked. There was really no way to left to resist Israel peacefully.

                            “We rolled down all of the pathways to get some of our rights—not all of them. We knocked on the door of reconciliation and we weren’t allowed in. We knocked on the door of elections and we were deprived of them. We knocked on the door of a political document for the whole world—we said, ‘We want peace, but give us some of our rights’—but they didn’t let us in.” He added, “We tried every path. We didn’t find one political path to take us out of this morass and free us from occupation.”

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #39

                            Palestinians tried everything the “right” way.

                            I’m well aware - have been following this conflict for 40 years, generally siding with the Palestinians. I will say however that no one has done such a clean job of “trying it the right way” as you make out here. It’s been far more morally grey from the start.

                            But let’s accept your point and the language you’re establishing here. They tried everything the right way. Now they’re trying everything the wrong way. It’s like I said: they stopped waiting for the world’s moral outrage to save them, went it alone, and have played it as dirty as they think they need to. Understandable. Predictable.

                            They don’t need me to think it’s excusable, and it happens that I don’t. They’ve discarded any hope of moral rectitude and are simply trying to win the fight in practical terms by whatever means available. They’re not trying to be right, they’re trying to be effective - to control land, repel Israel, and help Palestinians.

                            How would you say they’re doing?

                            Instead of quibbling over whether suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism are orally excusable, judge them by their effectiveness on behalf of the Palestinians.

                            It’s hard to say what their condition would be without the suicide bombings, rocket attacks, and hostage takings over the last 20 years since the second intifada. No one knows what would have happened in an alternate reality where they continued doing things “the right way.”

                            But from what I see, “the wrong way” is not only wrong but ineffective. The October attacks have succeeded at the impossible: restoring Israel’s moral standing in the eyes of the world. If the west were silently complicit before, they are actively and vociferously complicit now. Gaza is nearly sanitized of all life. There isn’t even a bargaining table at which to give everything away at. Palestinians are being erased from existence.

                            So maybe, just maybe, on “effectiveness” grounds, these tactics are a practical failure as much as they are a moral evil.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I [email protected]

                              Damn the IDF is executing Palestinians who protest against them?

                              Oh wait they did that in 2017 in broad daylight.

                              If only there was any evidence for Hamas doing it. The 4k projector must be on again.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #40

                              Yes, yes, idk how many cam phones are in Gaza these days but imagine far fewer than before.

                              Don’t forget this latest conflict started because Hamas raided an Israeli concert for hostages and were always throwing so many missiles as Israel they invented and built the most advanced missile defense system in the world.

                              Here’s how I see it, Jews shouldn’t have been given Israel after WW2 because it was already settled but it happened. When the Jews won the wars to hold Israel, the Palestinians never accepted defeat and because of it, never made peace. Because they never made peace and have lived for vengeance for decades, they are now doomed.

                              I 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S [email protected]

                                Palestinians tried everything the “right” way.

                                I’m well aware - have been following this conflict for 40 years, generally siding with the Palestinians. I will say however that no one has done such a clean job of “trying it the right way” as you make out here. It’s been far more morally grey from the start.

                                But let’s accept your point and the language you’re establishing here. They tried everything the right way. Now they’re trying everything the wrong way. It’s like I said: they stopped waiting for the world’s moral outrage to save them, went it alone, and have played it as dirty as they think they need to. Understandable. Predictable.

                                They don’t need me to think it’s excusable, and it happens that I don’t. They’ve discarded any hope of moral rectitude and are simply trying to win the fight in practical terms by whatever means available. They’re not trying to be right, they’re trying to be effective - to control land, repel Israel, and help Palestinians.

                                How would you say they’re doing?

                                Instead of quibbling over whether suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism are orally excusable, judge them by their effectiveness on behalf of the Palestinians.

                                It’s hard to say what their condition would be without the suicide bombings, rocket attacks, and hostage takings over the last 20 years since the second intifada. No one knows what would have happened in an alternate reality where they continued doing things “the right way.”

                                But from what I see, “the wrong way” is not only wrong but ineffective. The October attacks have succeeded at the impossible: restoring Israel’s moral standing in the eyes of the world. If the west were silently complicit before, they are actively and vociferously complicit now. Gaza is nearly sanitized of all life. There isn’t even a bargaining table at which to give everything away at. Palestinians are being erased from existence.

                                So maybe, just maybe, on “effectiveness” grounds, these tactics are a practical failure as much as they are a moral evil.

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #41

                                They’ve discarded any hope of moral rectitude and are simply trying to win the fight in practical terms by whatever means available.

                                Children. Are. Dying.

                                Standing on principle for decades is good, but you cannot ask people to watch whole families die and do nothing. Israel shooting and killing hundreds of unarmed protestors with no consequences from the rest of the world showed that it will never work. You ask about effectiveness, Israel showed that they won’t allow nonviolent protest, they lock up moderate politicians and fund extremists, and make any sort of peaceful reconciliation impossible. The large majority of Israelis and Palestinians who want peace are actively blocked by the Netanyahu government. It’s nice to tell people how they should do things from the comfort of your safe home with electricity.

                                S 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S [email protected]

                                  They’ve discarded any hope of moral rectitude and are simply trying to win the fight in practical terms by whatever means available.

                                  Children. Are. Dying.

                                  Standing on principle for decades is good, but you cannot ask people to watch whole families die and do nothing. Israel shooting and killing hundreds of unarmed protestors with no consequences from the rest of the world showed that it will never work. You ask about effectiveness, Israel showed that they won’t allow nonviolent protest, they lock up moderate politicians and fund extremists, and make any sort of peaceful reconciliation impossible. The large majority of Israelis and Palestinians who want peace are actively blocked by the Netanyahu government. It’s nice to tell people how they should do things from the comfort of your safe home with electricity.

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #42

                                  I wish their entire strategy was built around minimizing the number of children dying, but it is clearly not. There is no actor in this picture whose is.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S [email protected]

                                    I wish their entire strategy was built around minimizing the number of children dying, but it is clearly not. There is no actor in this picture whose is.

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #43

                                    I’m going to push back on that, Gazans have zero options to prevent children dying. No options at all. They can’t even send them away since Israel won’t let them out. Hamas surrendering won’t save children’s lives. They have no “best” option since even Israeli officials are saying that Arab children are a threat that must be addressed now early or later. There’s no winning against a genocidal threat.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S [email protected]

                                      I’m going to push back on that, Gazans have zero options to prevent children dying. No options at all. They can’t even send them away since Israel won’t let them out. Hamas surrendering won’t save children’s lives. They have no “best” option since even Israeli officials are saying that Arab children are a threat that must be addressed now early or later. There’s no winning against a genocidal threat.

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #44

                                      Such selective logic. Their massive terrorist attack has caused such blowback that now they have no good options to minimize child deaths. Maybe the terror attack was not about preventing child deaths? That’s the point here.

                                      I understand you want to champion the Palestinians because they are dreadfully overmatched. But don’t let that whitewash your view of a very grey situation.

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest

                                        Yes, yes, idk how many cam phones are in Gaza these days but imagine far fewer than before.

                                        Don’t forget this latest conflict started because Hamas raided an Israeli concert for hostages and were always throwing so many missiles as Israel they invented and built the most advanced missile defense system in the world.

                                        Here’s how I see it, Jews shouldn’t have been given Israel after WW2 because it was already settled but it happened. When the Jews won the wars to hold Israel, the Palestinians never accepted defeat and because of it, never made peace. Because they never made peace and have lived for vengeance for decades, they are now doomed.

                                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #45

                                        No this conflict started because Israel violated a ceasefire on March 18 and massacared more than 200 Palestinian children in terror bombings.

                                        There was a ceasefire on March 18. There was no ceasefire on October 7.

                                        ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • I [email protected]

                                          No this conflict started because Israel violated a ceasefire on March 18 and massacared more than 200 Palestinian children in terror bombings.

                                          There was a ceasefire on March 18. There was no ceasefire on October 7.

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #46

                                          I consider the current conflict having started in October 2022 because a lot of these ceasefires feel more like a pause in a war not the end of a war. Wars end with leaders dead or lasting agreements.

                                          I 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups