What contemporary music hits do you think will stand the test of time?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Darude - Sandstorm
-
"Shut Up and Dance" by Walk the Moon
wrote last edited by [email protected]The whole TALKING IS HARD album is great
-
This post did not contain any content.
ONE MORE TIME by blink-182, released in 2023.
That song is pretty good, has a great emotional core to it, and seems perfectly made for reunions.
-
OP: gimme some contemporary music
Rudyharrelson: here's some songs from a decade ago
^although I have to admit I agree with your choices^
I don't think pop music has evolved so much in the last 10 years that either of those songs would be outside of the definition of "contemporary music".
-
This post did not contain any content.
Pink Pony Club by Chappell Roan, released in 2023.
It's got hooks and it speaks to an interesting form of teenage rebellion/identity. I feel like the song is a modern form of "This isn't just a phase, it's who I am!"
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
None.
Nothing that's a 'hit' in the modern day will have any of the staying power of say, Beethoven.
Even now, hits are dead within a few years. The average person is being conditioned to only 'consume' entertainment that has been recently released.
To hopefully drive this point home, notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he's parodying? Nobody thinks this will be the case when a song is new and the consumer bandwagon is being told to like it.
I'm sure people thought, say, something like SAIL would 'stand the test of time,' but it's actually cringe as fuck to listen to now. That's not going to change as time passes.
Notice how Elvis, the 'king of rock' has no staying power? I'm sure if you told people that he'd be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they'd look at you like you're crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they're trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
There is contemporary music that will stand the test of time, like from Ulrich Schnauss and Felix Laband.
But have you even heard of either of those?
-
"Shut Up and Dance" by Walk the Moon
That's one of my favorite songs.
-
How recent is the cutoff for contemporary?
wrote last edited by [email protected]4 years, the length of high school?
-
ONE MORE TIME by blink-182, released in 2023.
That song is pretty good, has a great emotional core to it, and seems perfectly made for reunions.
I think this was Daft Punk actually
-
For comparison, what are other songs which have previously stood the test of time?
That buddy Holly one, I forget what it's called
-
Pink Pony Club by Chappell Roan, released in 2023.
It's got hooks and it speaks to an interesting form of teenage rebellion/identity. I feel like the song is a modern form of "This isn't just a phase, it's who I am!"
I only just heard this the first time recently and it's got some stickiness to it! Definitely a song people will recognize a couple decades from now. Centuries, maybe not.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Neverender by Justice and Tame Impala
-
Neverender by Justice and Tame Impala
that's a sick animation video
-
None.
Nothing that's a 'hit' in the modern day will have any of the staying power of say, Beethoven.
Even now, hits are dead within a few years. The average person is being conditioned to only 'consume' entertainment that has been recently released.
To hopefully drive this point home, notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he's parodying? Nobody thinks this will be the case when a song is new and the consumer bandwagon is being told to like it.
I'm sure people thought, say, something like SAIL would 'stand the test of time,' but it's actually cringe as fuck to listen to now. That's not going to change as time passes.
Notice how Elvis, the 'king of rock' has no staying power? I'm sure if you told people that he'd be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they'd look at you like you're crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they're trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
There is contemporary music that will stand the test of time, like from Ulrich Schnauss and Felix Laband.
But have you even heard of either of those?
Notice how Elvis, the 'king of rock' has no staying power? I'm sure if you told people that he'd be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they'd look at you like you're crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they're trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Ram Ranch
-
This post did not contain any content.
I dunno about standing the test of time, but there's a compilation of the most recognizable song each year of the past 100 years (2024 version)
Alternatively, for popular modern music, here be most popular song each month in the 2020s
-
I think this was Daft Punk actually
Daft Punk made their song in 2001.
-
None.
Nothing that's a 'hit' in the modern day will have any of the staying power of say, Beethoven.
Even now, hits are dead within a few years. The average person is being conditioned to only 'consume' entertainment that has been recently released.
To hopefully drive this point home, notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he's parodying? Nobody thinks this will be the case when a song is new and the consumer bandwagon is being told to like it.
I'm sure people thought, say, something like SAIL would 'stand the test of time,' but it's actually cringe as fuck to listen to now. That's not going to change as time passes.
Notice how Elvis, the 'king of rock' has no staying power? I'm sure if you told people that he'd be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they'd look at you like you're crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they're trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
There is contemporary music that will stand the test of time, like from Ulrich Schnauss and Felix Laband.
But have you even heard of either of those?
wrote last edited by [email protected]You seem to have a bias where the only music that matters to you is Intelligent Dance Music and maybe classical.
I listened to a bit of Ulrich Schnauss while typing this (Blumenthal which played into Clear Day) and...it was aight. I don't usually listen to dance music, so there's probably something I'm missing, but the way you talked it up as the only modern music that matters, I was expecting some crazy composition techniques that you'd never hear in anything even remotely pop-adjacent.
notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he's parodying
I can name one song where I think this is true (Ridin' Dirty > White and Nerdy.) Seriously I have no idea where this comes from.
Notice how Elvis, the 'king of rock' has no staying power?
But what about the Beatles? They have a lot more longevity and aren't that much younger. Elvis was the king of an embryonic form of Rock and Roll, and in general I don't think the earliest versions of genres age well. The earliest forms of hip hop are generally seen as being cheesy and having extremely simple flows, and if you try to throw back to them today, you're seen as making a shallow parody of hip hop, but when you get to the styles that came to prominence in the 90s, the songs are still widely listened to and beloved. Anecdotally I have trouble seeing pre-bebop jazz as jazz. Bebop is what brought in so much of the complexity that we associate with jazz today.
-
You seem to have a bias where the only music that matters to you is Intelligent Dance Music and maybe classical.
I listened to a bit of Ulrich Schnauss while typing this (Blumenthal which played into Clear Day) and...it was aight. I don't usually listen to dance music, so there's probably something I'm missing, but the way you talked it up as the only modern music that matters, I was expecting some crazy composition techniques that you'd never hear in anything even remotely pop-adjacent.
notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he's parodying
I can name one song where I think this is true (Ridin' Dirty > White and Nerdy.) Seriously I have no idea where this comes from.
Notice how Elvis, the 'king of rock' has no staying power?
But what about the Beatles? They have a lot more longevity and aren't that much younger. Elvis was the king of an embryonic form of Rock and Roll, and in general I don't think the earliest versions of genres age well. The earliest forms of hip hop are generally seen as being cheesy and having extremely simple flows, and if you try to throw back to them today, you're seen as making a shallow parody of hip hop, but when you get to the styles that came to prominence in the 90s, the songs are still widely listened to and beloved. Anecdotally I have trouble seeing pre-bebop jazz as jazz. Bebop is what brought in so much of the complexity that we associate with jazz today.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Thanks for the constructive response.
Schnauss doesn't rewrite the rules and has even gone on record as saying that the techniques used by classical composers for traditional instruments translate very well to making music with electronics. Instead of expecting something that tries to set itself apart as much as possible from what came before, I'm referring to artists that build upon the ideas of the past.
Another artist who you've probably never heard of that fits this bill is William Orbit. He's already bigger than Schnauss and way more recognized because of his collaborations. I guarantee if you haven't heard of him, you've heard a song he's collaborated on.
Listen to some of his solo stuff: Hello Waveforms, My Oracle Lives Uptown, Strange Cargo 5. He actually 'recently' released a new album called The Painter and I highly recommend it. It's the same concept as with Schnauss. They don't ignore what came before; they learn from and integrate it into something more.
I think the longevity of the Beatles compared to Elvis coincides with how much younger they are. Sure, they're not "that much younger," but the difference seems to linearly relate to their staying power; I'd expect the Beatles to be as relevant as Elvis is now in a few years.
That's not to say there's no chance for a brief resurgence of any of their music. Look at how fusion from the 80s made a comeback a few years ago. It didn't lead or change the direction music is going, but people could still find value in it after the "been there, done that" phase has passed.
