Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
-
Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
I know why.
Is it because of the Uyghurs?
-
Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
I know why.
Because that one was over double the length of the record before it and this one is closer to a 35% increase.
-
Because that one was over double the length of the record before it and this one is closer to a 35% increase.
So it's probably just a "slams"
-
Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
I know why.
I know!
Because the articles were written by different people and published in different magazines ya goober.
-
So it's probably just a "slams"
'Boinks'
-
I know!
Because the articles were written by different people and published in different magazines ya goober.
Nah.
It's because of the Chinese propaganda machine.
-
'Boinks'
whopping
-
Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
I know why.
Dumbass lol
-
whopping
France bamboozles chinas nuclear reactor time with a steel chair
-
Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
I know why.
They'll never tell.
-
Why don't we use "shatters world record" like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?
I know why.
Why do you care so much what an article says about France's accomplishments of science and China's accomplishments of science? Why can't we enjoy the movement of technology without bickering about lines drawn in the sand by people none of us know or care about?
-
System shared this topic onSystem shared this topic on
