Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. "Nearly half of US employees admit to time theft!"

"Nearly half of US employees admit to time theft!"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C [email protected]

    I mean a company does need to make profit. Excessive profits is another thing.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    No they do not. They need to break even only. Profit is the result of charging customers too much, paying employees too little, or enshitification.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A [email protected]

      No they do not. They need to break even only. Profit is the result of charging customers too much, paying employees too little, or enshitification.

      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      No company wants to stay stagnant. They want to grow. You can’t grow if you’re not making more money.

      S A 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • F [email protected]

        No company wants to stay stagnant. They want to grow. You can’t grow if you’re not making more money.

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Worker productivity is like holding sand. It you grab it and squeeze it hard, it just runs through your fingers and falls to the ground. But if you cup your hands and support it carefully you can hold on to much larger amounts of it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F [email protected]

          No company wants to stay stagnant. They want to grow. You can’t grow if you’re not making more money.

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Spending profits on stock buybacks and bonuses is literally the opposite of wanting to grow.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C [email protected]

            I mean a company does need to make profit. Excessive profits is another thing.

            arararagi@ani.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            arararagi@ani.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Username checks out.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C [email protected]

              I think it's a bit unfair to blanket statement that capitalism is a scam. There need to be checks in place. Like, I agree it's not fair that me as a business owner can simply say "this year we are skipping raises, and I am paying myself 2 billion". There's no reason any one person needs a trillion dollars. That's an insane amount of money. Even 100 million is a shit ton of money. There definitely need to be checks in place, but I don't think communism is the answer either.

              umbrella@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
              umbrella@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by [email protected]
              #12

              .

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • umbrella@lemmy.mlU [email protected]

                .

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                What's the solution then?

                umbrella@lemmy.mlU 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C [email protected]

                  What's the solution then?

                  umbrella@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
                  umbrella@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                  #14

                  .

                  flisty@mstdn.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • umbrella@lemmy.mlU [email protected]

                    .

                    flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    flisty@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @umbrella @cyberpunk007 Some big UK brands don't run on an "all money is for one guy" model. John Lewis (dept store) and Waitrose (supermarket) are a partnership: the staff own it. Then we have lots of Co-operatives but the main one is mostly known for being a supermarket: member/ownership is £1 and you can vote at the AGM, get discounts and choose charities. It's not perfect - they all exist in a capitalist system - but there are other ways of running businesses that aren't for pure profit.

                    umbrella@lemmy.mlU 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • flisty@mstdn.socialF [email protected]

                      @umbrella @cyberpunk007 Some big UK brands don't run on an "all money is for one guy" model. John Lewis (dept store) and Waitrose (supermarket) are a partnership: the staff own it. Then we have lots of Co-operatives but the main one is mostly known for being a supermarket: member/ownership is £1 and you can vote at the AGM, get discounts and choose charities. It's not perfect - they all exist in a capitalist system - but there are other ways of running businesses that aren't for pure profit.

                      umbrella@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
                      umbrella@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                      #16

                      .

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • System shared this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups