Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. uBlock Origin is no longer available in the Chrome store

uBlock Origin is no longer available in the Chrome store

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
339 Posts 207 Posters 22 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P [email protected]

    Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

    show_me_your_asshole@lemm.eeS This user is from outside of this forum
    show_me_your_asshole@lemm.eeS This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    I legitimately don't understand how people tolerate using the internet without an adblocker just from a usability standpoint.

    Some pages are fine but frequently wandering to new pages on the internet is an experience in frustration.

    I use an adblocker. I wouldn't click on an ad even if I could see it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P [email protected]

      Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #61

      Bike cuck vibes

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D [email protected]

        Your annoyance does not pay the bills though. You are annoying yourself for nothing.

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #62

        If enough people block the ads then that’s a significant hit for publications.

        It doesn’t really annoy me though. I guess I have high tolerance. Maybe it’s also because I rarely use YouTube, thats the only place ads have annoyed me and only because they are constant and impossible to ignore.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P [email protected]

          Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

          O This user is from outside of this forum
          O This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #63

          I agree with your reasoning but I still do run an adblocker. There are only 3 things in my life (that I can think of) where what I think is right and what I actually do don't align: adblocking, piracy and eating meat.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P [email protected]

            Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

            D This user is from outside of this forum
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #64

            The big assumption here is that the website had time or money invested in it. I feel like the vast majority of websites these days are just ai garbage with enough ads to prevent you from even reading the thing and give your computer herpies as a bonus. The era of good faith advertising where the ads were reasonable and balanced with the quality of content is long gone. Most sites are now explicitly designed for exploitive data harvesting and endless ad delivery.

            Of course, some websites are exceptions to this and adblock can easily be toggled off for those websites if you really want to support them. Taking off protections for a trusted partner though is quite different from raw dogging the whole internet

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P [email protected]

              Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #65

              I do, but it's less about the ads and more about privacy. I don't use things like sponsor block because there's pretty much no privacy violation there. But I do use an ad blocker because advertisers track me across websites to build up a profile.

              I also don't want to make a free account, again because of privacy concerns (both from the site and from any data breaches.

              I'm happy to pay a little for content, but I haven't yet seen a system that respects my privacy and is reasonably priced. If that was a thing, I'd totally pay.

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #66

                the what store now

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P [email protected]

                  Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #67

                  I agree with you in principle but in practice way too many sites are doing ads in bullshit ways. If they were just along a sidebar or at the top/bottom of the page I'd have no issue but usually they affect the actual usability of the site and I'm not dealing with that. If they want to expose me to ads they need to make it not a problem for me.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zoneZ [email protected]

                    Even with CBII ads still make the internet cancerous to even look at

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #68

                    Oh for sure, but with CBII, malicious ads can't exploit a vulnerability and infect your local system.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V [email protected]

                      I wish Vivaldi wasn't Chromium-based, because I think it's the slickest browser out there.

                      But it's chromium, so it's time to move on to Firefox regardless.

                      Ladybird development can't happen fast enough.

                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #69

                      No, it can't! That's a very interesting one indeed, but I wouldn't risk moving to it at this time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P [email protected]

                        Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

                        U This user is from outside of this forum
                        U This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #70

                        I run ad blockers. As a security measure. Ad companies collect insane amount of data and do a bunch of shady stuff whenever they can get away with it.

                        I want to support websites whenever I'm able, but the way ad companies operate just ain't it.

                        If they clean up their act, maybe then I could stop using ad blockers, but it's been decades and I don't have high hopes.

                        Also using ad blockers for performance and usability reasons. For example, I used to use a bunch of Fandom wikis and couldn't understand why people hated the UI. Then I saw how Fandom looks like without ad blockers and holy shit how can humans live like this

                        J L 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • F [email protected]

                          Is there any firefox based browser on android where I can have easy gestures for the arrow buttons? All the firefox versions I can find require me to do this in two clicks which for the way I browse is a pain in the arse. Can I fix this somehow?

                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #71

                          You mean swiping left up go back? Works fine for me in regular FF on Android...

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P [email protected]

                            You mean swiping left up go back? Works fine for me in regular FF on Android...

                            F This user is from outside of this forum
                            F This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #72

                            Doesn’t work for me. I don’t have “plain” android but a specific type that’s compatible with my eink screen.

                            Chromium gestures work fine though.

                            ripcord@lemmy.worldR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L [email protected]

                              Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #73

                              Been a loooong time

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ? Guest

                                https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin/cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm

                                Still shows up for me

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Guest
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #74

                                shows up but it is not selectable

                                ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • A [email protected]

                                  But ublock origin lite is by the same dev.. Not as many features but it conforms to the new rules and is still much better than not having a blocker if you use chrome or edge.

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #75

                                  The best option here is to just tank Chrome's market share instead of making something that's obviously not ideal, work.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P [email protected]

                                    Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #76

                                    I respect your stance and I agree with the subscription vs ads decision, websites need to make money somehow and I dont want to pay a subscription for everything either. I do run an adblocker but whitelist websites I use often and that dont have intrusive ads.
                                    It unfortunately affects websites that I visit quickly and dont come back to, they get a visitor but no advertisements. Its not a perfect solution but ads tend to be very intrusive on random websites.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P [email protected]

                                      Ima be honest. I don’t run ad blockers. The way I see it, if I’m consuming content from a given source and that source invested time and/or money into said content then they deserve to be compensated for it. I am not willing to pay a subscription for every website out there, so ads are an acceptable compromise.

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #77

                                      You remind me of the old guy at work who called me a "FUCKING FREELOADER" because I told him about uBlock origin.

                                      I'm never recommending it again to anyone and I have since kept it a secret that I use an ad-blocker. I guess it's a problem for people.

                                      x00z@lemmy.worldX W 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest

                                        shows up but it is not selectable

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #78

                                        You sure this isn't US thing? Just added it.

                                        K 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L [email protected]

                                          Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #79

                                          Or in my app drawer

                                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups