Fingerprinting: Critics say Google rules put profits over privacy.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
System shared this topic on
-
This post did not contain any content.
Me waiting for the part we didn't already know.
: |
-
This post did not contain any content.
They're just now figuring this out?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Surprised Pikachu face.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I feel like Google would tell you the same thing if asked.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Well I am shocked SHOCKED I say...well...not that shocked.
...
...
How many times have I used that phrase since November, I feel like a lot LMFAO
-
This post did not contain any content.
They're a publicly-traded company.
All of them, without any exceptions, place profit above literally anything.
-
Surprised Pikachu face.
I gotchu fam:
-
This post did not contain any content.
Who are these critics and why is the BBC interviewing people who were born yesterday /s
-
This post did not contain any content.
Google prioritizing profits over the privacy of its users? Colour be shocked.
Seriously thought, is there anything at all that they do not prioritize over the privacy of its users at this point?
-
I feel like Google would tell you the same thing if asked.
Don’t be evil -
This post did not contain any content.
I swear to fuck... if i read one more article about people being surprised by lifesucking capitalist hell corporations being lifesucking capitalist hell corporations... i will leave another angry comment.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Bro... Nowadays if you don't permit fingerprinting half the internet just does not work.
It has been like this for a few years. But you don't really see it until you try to resist.
This behaviour is Harvey Weinstein vibes... But somehow people got conditioned that this is acceptable behaviour because corporate is doing and you agreed in the ToS that Sundar the creep can fuck your wife.
You wouldn't want to breach terms of this law full contract now, boy, would you?!
-
I swear to fuck... if i read one more article about people being surprised by lifesucking capitalist hell corporations being lifesucking capitalist hell corporations... i will leave another angry comment.
Aaaaaaah fuck!
-
Google prioritizing profits over the privacy of its users? Colour be shocked.
Seriously thought, is there anything at all that they do not prioritize over the privacy of its users at this point?
Maybe if they reframe the headline: "Shock: One of the worlds richest companies chooses to make money rather than respec... Oh nevermind i see it now"
-
This post did not contain any content.
Nahhhhh really? Who would’ve thought that the publicly traded corporation only cares about the money? What a shocker honestly
-
This post did not contain any content.
Colour me shocked, water is wet!
-
Bro... Nowadays if you don't permit fingerprinting half the internet just does not work.
It has been like this for a few years. But you don't really see it until you try to resist.
This behaviour is Harvey Weinstein vibes... But somehow people got conditioned that this is acceptable behaviour because corporate is doing and you agreed in the ToS that Sundar the creep can fuck your wife.
You wouldn't want to breach terms of this law full contract now, boy, would you?!
I don't know what half of the internet you use but my shit works perfectly fine when using ad blockers (which I assume also blocks fingerprinting?)
-
I don't know what half of the internet you use but my shit works perfectly fine when using ad blockers (which I assume also blocks fingerprinting?)
ad blocking in of itself does not block finger printing.
install noscrypt and block all that java script along with jshelter on privacy focused FF fork, please report back your experience to the class haha
-
ad blocking in of itself does not block finger printing.
install noscrypt and block all that java script along with jshelter on privacy focused FF fork, please report back your experience to the class haha
