Need a keyboard with a dedicated "slop" button
-
And there go the insults and attacks. Just what I was talking about in the beginning: anti ai people are way more extremist, way more obnoxious. You don't even know where I stand, for you it's enough to know I'm not 110% on your side and that's enough to attack.
You are the one getting offended by someone telling you accurately that you're mistaking a marketing term. Does your pathetic insecurity have no limits?
-
More attacks, more insults.
You are adamant to continue proving my point.
Your inability to address my point peoves mine. Good jpb being offended by mostly benign language. You only prove your mind is weaker than your feelings. Truly, a pathetic excuse for humanity. Just as dumb as a "mindless animal". "AI" will have no problem replacing your lack of quality.
-
You are the one getting offended by someone telling you accurately that you're mistaking a marketing term. Does your pathetic insecurity have no limits?
Ah, more insults.
You have bested me, sir. I can't compete with such rhetorical prowess. Bravo.Goodbye.
-
Your inability to address my point peoves mine. Good jpb being offended by mostly benign language. You only prove your mind is weaker than your feelings. Truly, a pathetic excuse for humanity. Just as dumb as a "mindless animal". "AI" will have no problem replacing your lack of quality.
Go on. Show everyone how obnoxious you are.
-
There definitely is a very real "AI derangement syndrome" kinda thing going around among some. It's like...we can be opposed to the use of AI to take away people's jobs while simultaneously dumbing down culture, without throwing out the ways it can actually be used by workers to improve their work output or the experience for them of doing the work. I'm not familiar with Kdenlive, but it sounds similar to Photoshop's generative fill, and that's a fantastic feature. Using AI to do a better version of what content-aware fill has done for over a decade. People who are opposed even to these uses need to pull their heads in, because they make it much harder to effectively oppose the real problems with AI.
content-aware fill was even started as a fucking GIMP plugin of all things
-
Go on. Show everyone how obnoxious you are.
My interest is only in proving your lack of substance, which is already thoroughly established.
-
My interest is only in proving your lack of substance, which is already thoroughly established.
Ah, no more childish insults?
You finally looked at the mirror.
Good on you.Take care. Bye.
-
Ah, no more childish insults?
You finally looked at the mirror.
Good on you.Take care. Bye.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Your flippant nature only furthers my point. Thank you for making this exchange as immature as your underdeveloped brain.
Mr, "I don't believe even copyright should exist" has nothing of substance to contribute. Makes sense!
-
The other reply has it right, but I wanted to reply to confirm.
"Pronouns" in this context almost always means "preferred pronouns" especially wrt people who have preferred pronouns that differ from those assigned at birth.
It's a bit hard to believe that someone would be aware of the study you mentioned, but not the common usage of the terms.
The other reply has it right, but I wanted to reply to confirm.
“Pronouns” in this context almost always means “preferred pronouns” especially wrt people who have preferred pronouns that differ from those assigned at birth. […]
I still don't really follow. Are you arguing that the usage of one's preferred pronouns doesn't harm the user? Or are you arguing that the misuse of one's pronouns causes them no harm?
-
The other reply has it right, but I wanted to reply to confirm.
"Pronouns" in this context almost always means "preferred pronouns" especially wrt people who have preferred pronouns that differ from those assigned at birth.
It's a bit hard to believe that someone would be aware of the study you mentioned, but not the common usage of the terms.
[…] the study you mentioned […]
What study are you referring to?
