Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. The Onion
  3. Conservative Dad Who Exclusively Watches History Channel Learns Nothing From It

Conservative Dad Who Exclusively Watches History Channel Learns Nothing From It

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Onion
theonion
41 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO [email protected]

    Good thing it's on the hard times then 😉

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    weak men make hard times.

    not talking about history, looking for some twinks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O [email protected]

      Maybe that's why everything went to shit, because they stopped (or once showed?) the endless hitler content.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by [email protected]
      #33

      I unironically think it probably played a role. When I was growing up (and History Channel showed WWII history), it was generally just understood and accepted that Nazis were evil scum and Hitler was one of the worst people in the 20th century. It wasn't even up for debate.

      It's probably more about the sabotaging of our public education system, but I think this is actually part of that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zerocool@lemmy.caZ [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        From the thumbnail, I thought this was going to be about Al Bundy.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • merc@sh.itjust.worksM [email protected]

          but that's more of a result of poor material conditions forcing inovations

          Well, also Germany was one of the world leaders in science and technology in the early 1900s all the way up to WWII. Just look at the list of winners of the Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry and how many of them are German. You could even see this in the recent Oppenheimer movie, where they showed him travelling to the University of Göttingen because that was where you needed to be to study cutting edge theoretical physics. And this was the 1920s when Germany was already suffering having to repay massive war debts after WWI.

          What happened? When Hitler rose to power the Nazis drove off all the Jewish scientists, and scared off a lot of the gentiles. It's almost exactly the same situation as in the US today. Even the chaotic Weimar Republic wasn't enough to cause Germany's lead on science to collapse. But, when Hitler came to power, the scientists left, and a lot of them came to the US. This was the start of the US dominating science for decades, something which may collapse now due to Trump.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by [email protected]
          #35

          Germany was one of the world leaders in science and technology in the early 1900s all the way up to WWII

          One of the greatest ironies of WWI is that going into the war, British and French propellants and explosive charges for artillery made extensive use of synthetic chemicals purchased from Germany, while German artillery propellants relied on guano from South America. The British Navy immediately choked off German supplies of foreign guano (and obviously France and Britain could no longer purchase German chemicals) leading to the so-called "shell crisis" that afflicted all sides with severe artillery shortages after the first few months of the war exhausted their stockpiles.

          "Fortunately," all the combatants quickly found substitutes and ramped up production, allowing them to slaughter each other in enormous numbers for years more. Another fun fact: during WWI, approximately 260 artillery shells were fired for each soldier killed (and only about 2/3 of all dead soldiers were killed by artillery).

          A merc@sh.itjust.worksM 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          • forester@pawb.socialF [email protected]

            But the reason Germany was so full of those scientists is because Germany lacked access to good coal seams and to petroleum reserves and also its massive dye industry from the 1800s. In a similar fashion, Germany learned to use metals like magnesium because they were abundant while pure iron was not

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            Fun fact: in both world wars, Germany was absolutely dependent upon Swedish iron ore to produce high-quality steel. In WWI, it was only the High Seas Fleet of battleships and battlecruisers that prevented the Royal Navy from sailing into the Baltic and choking off this supply and ending the war (an under-appreciated reason for Germany building all those capital ships in the first place while being generally unwilling to risk losing them all in a major fleet engagement). In WWII, it was Hitler's quick occupation of Norway and the Luftwaffe that preserved the supply of Swedish ore.

            Germany was also critically dependent upon Swedish ball-bearings, but at least Sweden sold those to both sides.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • zerocool@lemmy.caZ [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              It'd be more believable if it was talking about ancient aliens.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • C [email protected]

                Germany was one of the world leaders in science and technology in the early 1900s all the way up to WWII

                One of the greatest ironies of WWI is that going into the war, British and French propellants and explosive charges for artillery made extensive use of synthetic chemicals purchased from Germany, while German artillery propellants relied on guano from South America. The British Navy immediately choked off German supplies of foreign guano (and obviously France and Britain could no longer purchase German chemicals) leading to the so-called "shell crisis" that afflicted all sides with severe artillery shortages after the first few months of the war exhausted their stockpiles.

                "Fortunately," all the combatants quickly found substitutes and ramped up production, allowing them to slaughter each other in enormous numbers for years more. Another fun fact: during WWI, approximately 260 artillery shells were fired for each soldier killed (and only about 2/3 of all dead soldiers were killed by artillery).

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                Were the other 1/3 from flu/illness or are gas attacks not included in artillery deaths maybe?

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • forester@pawb.socialF [email protected]

                  But the reason Germany was so full of those scientists is because Germany lacked access to good coal seams and to petroleum reserves and also its massive dye industry from the 1800s. In a similar fashion, Germany learned to use metals like magnesium because they were abundant while pure iron was not

                  merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                  merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  That may have been part of it, but another part is that there was relative peace and stability for about a century, many government reforms that modernized the country, and the industrial revolution making Germany into a world power. Also, AFAIK, iron was relatively abundant in the Ruhr valley, along with coal, which is why it became the industrial centre for the country.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C [email protected]

                    Germany was one of the world leaders in science and technology in the early 1900s all the way up to WWII

                    One of the greatest ironies of WWI is that going into the war, British and French propellants and explosive charges for artillery made extensive use of synthetic chemicals purchased from Germany, while German artillery propellants relied on guano from South America. The British Navy immediately choked off German supplies of foreign guano (and obviously France and Britain could no longer purchase German chemicals) leading to the so-called "shell crisis" that afflicted all sides with severe artillery shortages after the first few months of the war exhausted their stockpiles.

                    "Fortunately," all the combatants quickly found substitutes and ramped up production, allowing them to slaughter each other in enormous numbers for years more. Another fun fact: during WWI, approximately 260 artillery shells were fired for each soldier killed (and only about 2/3 of all dead soldiers were killed by artillery).

                    merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                    merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    Not sure how "fun" that fact is, but yeah, the number of artillery shells fired in WWI is just amazing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A [email protected]

                      Were the other 1/3 from flu/illness or are gas attacks not included in artillery deaths maybe?

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      Mostly machine gun and rifle bullets. Deaths from gas were quite rare, relatively speaking, although it caused a lot of non-fatal casualties. By "soldiers' deaths" I meant combat deaths, not illnesses, which in almost all wars in history killed more people than actual combat.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups