Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Revealed: Thousands of UK university students caught cheating using AI

Revealed: Thousands of UK university students caught cheating using AI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
65 Posts 34 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A [email protected]

    I guess what I don’t understand is what changed? Is everything homework now? When I was in school, even college, a significant percentage of learning was in class work, pop quizzes, and weekly closed book tests. How are these kids using LLMs so much for class if a large portion of the work is still in the classroom? Or is that just not the case anymore? It’s not like ChatGPT can handwrite an essay in pencil or give an in person presentation (yet).

    W This user is from outside of this forum
    W This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    University was always guided self-learning, at least in the UK. The lecturers are not teachers. The provide and explain material, but they're not there to hand-hold you through it.

    University education is very different to what goes on at younger ages. It has to be when a class is 300 rather than 30 people.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    7
    • W [email protected]

      University was always guided self-learning, at least in the UK. The lecturers are not teachers. The provide and explain material, but they're not there to hand-hold you through it.

      University education is very different to what goes on at younger ages. It has to be when a class is 300 rather than 30 people.

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      WTF? 300? There were barely 350 people in my graduating class of high school and that isn’t a small class for where I am from. The largest class size at my college was maybe 60. No wonder people use LLMs. Like, that’s just called an auditorium at that point, how could you even ask a question? Self-guided isn’t supposed to mean “solo”.

      P W 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • A [email protected]

        WTF? 300? There were barely 350 people in my graduating class of high school and that isn’t a small class for where I am from. The largest class size at my college was maybe 60. No wonder people use LLMs. Like, that’s just called an auditorium at that point, how could you even ask a question? Self-guided isn’t supposed to mean “solo”.

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        You can ask questions in auditorium classes.

        The 300+ student courses typically were high volume courses like intro or freshman courses.

        Second year cuts down significantly in class size, but also depends on the subject.

        3rd and 4th year courses, in my experience, were 30-50 students

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • P [email protected]

          You can ask questions in auditorium classes.

          The 300+ student courses typically were high volume courses like intro or freshman courses.

          Second year cuts down significantly in class size, but also depends on the subject.

          3rd and 4th year courses, in my experience, were 30-50 students

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          You can ask questions in auditorium classes.

          I am going to be honest; I don’t believe you. I genuinely don’t believe that in a class with more people than minutes in the session that a person could legitimately have time to interact with the professor.

          The 60 person class I referred to was a required lecture portion freshman science class with a smaller lab portion. That we could ask questions in the lab was the only reason 60 people was okay in the lecture and even then the professor said he felt it was too many people.

          P jacksonlamb@lemmy.worldJ 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • A [email protected]

            You can ask questions in auditorium classes.

            I am going to be honest; I don’t believe you. I genuinely don’t believe that in a class with more people than minutes in the session that a person could legitimately have time to interact with the professor.

            The 60 person class I referred to was a required lecture portion freshman science class with a smaller lab portion. That we could ask questions in the lab was the only reason 60 people was okay in the lecture and even then the professor said he felt it was too many people.

            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            That’s fine if you don’t, but you can ask questions.

            They even have these clickers that allow the professor to ask “snap questions” with multiple choice answers so they can check understanding

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • P [email protected]

              That’s fine if you don’t, but you can ask questions.

              They even have these clickers that allow the professor to ask “snap questions” with multiple choice answers so they can check understanding

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              I can’t believe people go into debt for that experience. I would be livid.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 30p87@feddit.org3 [email protected]

                Should be expelled and banned for life.

                golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG This user is from outside of this forum
                golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                Everyone who's not religious cheats though.

                30p87@feddit.org3 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG [email protected]

                  Everyone who's not religious cheats though.

                  30p87@feddit.org3 This user is from outside of this forum
                  30p87@feddit.org3 This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  I'm the most atheistic person you're gonna meet, and no, I don't cheat.

                  golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 30p87@feddit.org3 [email protected]

                    I'm the most atheistic person you're gonna meet, and no, I don't cheat.

                    golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG This user is from outside of this forum
                    golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    Maybe not with AI but in a different way. Also exceptions obviously exist.

                    Anyways enough of boosting your stats.

                    30p87@feddit.org3 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG [email protected]

                      Maybe not with AI but in a different way. Also exceptions obviously exist.

                      Anyways enough of boosting your stats.

                      30p87@feddit.org3 This user is from outside of this forum
                      30p87@feddit.org3 This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      Also not without ML. Especially in university you don't learn out of obligation anymore, you learn to actually acquire new skills. As soon as you let someone else or an LLM do that, you're very clearly showing that you don't actually have any interest in learning, but only in succeeding. Which is very fucking worthless, and dangerous.

                      golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • 30p87@feddit.org3 [email protected]

                        Also not without ML. Especially in university you don't learn out of obligation anymore, you learn to actually acquire new skills. As soon as you let someone else or an LLM do that, you're very clearly showing that you don't actually have any interest in learning, but only in succeeding. Which is very fucking worthless, and dangerous.

                        golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG This user is from outside of this forum
                        golfnovemberuniform@infosec.pubG This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        I wish people were so informed about online toxicity like you are about studying.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R [email protected]

                          it is snake oil in the sense that it is being sold as "AI", which it isn't. It is dangerous because LLMs can be used for targeted manipulation of millions if not billions of people.

                          O This user is from outside of this forum
                          O This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          ban photoshop too

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C [email protected]

                            Yeah, I do worry about that. We haven't seen much in the way of propaganda bots or even LLM scams, but the potential is there.

                            Hopefully, people will learn to be skeptical they way they did with photoshopped photos, and not the way they didn't with where their data is going.

                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            Evidence says people aren't skeptical for the most part and LLMs are good enough to fool all of us some of the time and some of us all of the time 😞

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A [email protected]

                              WTF? 300? There were barely 350 people in my graduating class of high school and that isn’t a small class for where I am from. The largest class size at my college was maybe 60. No wonder people use LLMs. Like, that’s just called an auditorium at that point, how could you even ask a question? Self-guided isn’t supposed to mean “solo”.

                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              There'd be smaller tutorial sessions. I'd have a once a week 5 on 1 session with my tutor for an hour. Lab sessions might be 30-40 people. Specialist courses would be 100 people.

                              ...but yes, lectures were 300+ people for the core subjects. Generally you and your peers would work together on making sense of it all. You'd find that some people understood some subjects better than others and you'd help each other out.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                                Guardian investigation finds almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating – and experts says these are tip of the iceberg

                                Thousands of university students in the UK have been caught misusing ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools in recent years, while traditional forms of plagiarism show a marked decline, a Guardian investigation can reveal.

                                A survey of academic integrity violations found almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating using AI tools in 2023-24, equivalent to 5.1 for every 1,000 students. That was up from 1.6 cases per 1,000 in 2022-23.

                                Figures up to May suggest that number will increase again this year to about 7.5 proven cases per 1,000 students – but recorded cases represent only the tip of the iceberg, according to experts.

                                The data highlights a rapidly evolving challenge for universities: trying to adapt assessment methods to the advent of technologies such as ChatGPT and other AI-powered writing tools.

                                H This user is from outside of this forum
                                H This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                Three magic words - "Open Note Exam"

                                Students prep their own notes (usually limited to "X pages"), take them into the exam, gets to use them for answering questions.

                                Tests application and understanding over recall. If students AI their notes, they will be useless.

                                Been running my exams as open note for 3 years now - so far so good. Students are happy, I don't have to worry about cheating, and the university remains permanently angry because they want everything to be coursework so everyone gets an AI A ^_^

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • A [email protected]

                                  You can ask questions in auditorium classes.

                                  I am going to be honest; I don’t believe you. I genuinely don’t believe that in a class with more people than minutes in the session that a person could legitimately have time to interact with the professor.

                                  The 60 person class I referred to was a required lecture portion freshman science class with a smaller lab portion. That we could ask questions in the lab was the only reason 60 people was okay in the lecture and even then the professor said he felt it was too many people.

                                  jacksonlamb@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jacksonlamb@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  Your disbelief is strange.

                                  People occasionally ask questions in lectures. Anything they are confused about gets covered off in tutorials later. Lecturers and tutors both have office hours where further questions are asked.

                                  If a student has learning difficulties or special requirements there is pastoral care available for that.

                                  It's really not mysterious.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • D [email protected]

                                    we're doomed

                                    jacksonlamb@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jacksonlamb@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    We are indeed. Not looking forward to my old age, where doctors, accountants, and engineers cheated their way into being qualified by using a glorified autocorrect.

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                                      Guardian investigation finds almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating – and experts says these are tip of the iceberg

                                      Thousands of university students in the UK have been caught misusing ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools in recent years, while traditional forms of plagiarism show a marked decline, a Guardian investigation can reveal.

                                      A survey of academic integrity violations found almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating using AI tools in 2023-24, equivalent to 5.1 for every 1,000 students. That was up from 1.6 cases per 1,000 in 2022-23.

                                      Figures up to May suggest that number will increase again this year to about 7.5 proven cases per 1,000 students – but recorded cases represent only the tip of the iceberg, according to experts.

                                      The data highlights a rapidly evolving challenge for universities: trying to adapt assessment methods to the advent of technologies such as ChatGPT and other AI-powered writing tools.

                                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      Not from UK and also not a student, but imo this is more a school problem than the students. The teachers just do not understand how to cope with AI. With open note exam and traditional exam style questions, I would be an idiot if I do use AI.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                                        Guardian investigation finds almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating – and experts says these are tip of the iceberg

                                        Thousands of university students in the UK have been caught misusing ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools in recent years, while traditional forms of plagiarism show a marked decline, a Guardian investigation can reveal.

                                        A survey of academic integrity violations found almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating using AI tools in 2023-24, equivalent to 5.1 for every 1,000 students. That was up from 1.6 cases per 1,000 in 2022-23.

                                        Figures up to May suggest that number will increase again this year to about 7.5 proven cases per 1,000 students – but recorded cases represent only the tip of the iceberg, according to experts.

                                        The data highlights a rapidly evolving challenge for universities: trying to adapt assessment methods to the advent of technologies such as ChatGPT and other AI-powered writing tools.

                                        J This user is from outside of this forum
                                        J This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                        #51

                                        It's not cheating, it's vibe studying

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        7
                                        • microwave@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                                          Guardian investigation finds almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating – and experts says these are tip of the iceberg

                                          Thousands of university students in the UK have been caught misusing ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools in recent years, while traditional forms of plagiarism show a marked decline, a Guardian investigation can reveal.

                                          A survey of academic integrity violations found almost 7,000 proven cases of cheating using AI tools in 2023-24, equivalent to 5.1 for every 1,000 students. That was up from 1.6 cases per 1,000 in 2022-23.

                                          Figures up to May suggest that number will increase again this year to about 7.5 proven cases per 1,000 students – but recorded cases represent only the tip of the iceberg, according to experts.

                                          The data highlights a rapidly evolving challenge for universities: trying to adapt assessment methods to the advent of technologies such as ChatGPT and other AI-powered writing tools.

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          If using ChatGPT for tests is cheating, I’d argue calculators are cheating for math.. it’s just another tool at people’s disposal as far as I’m concerned.

                                          S A L 3 Replies Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups