Who remembers this?
-
This post did not contain any content.
ARE YOU FR? WHO REMEMBERES THIS? IS THIS A SARCASTIC POST??? SAY SIKE OP
-
Because no one has posted the other photos:
And this is a photo of the same dress taken under proper lighting:
The second photo is supposed to be the same dress? Looks like an homage, aka knock-off attempt to me. What happened to the shoulders?
-
I've always really liked this explanation image you can find on Wikipedia page for it. Essentially, people who see white and gold are mistaking the lighting to be cold and blue-tinted, rather than warm and yellow-tinted.
The portions inside the boxes are the exact same colors, you can easily check this with a color picker.
As in using the colour picker on the image and finding the corresponding code? That's actually an explanation that I can get behind. Classic example of trust your instrument.
I see the dress as gold and white, no matter ehow hard I try to see the other side of the coin.
-
I've always really liked this explanation image you can find on Wikipedia page for it. Essentially, people who see white and gold are mistaking the lighting to be cold and blue-tinted, rather than warm and yellow-tinted.
The portions inside the boxes are the exact same colors, you can easily check this with a color picker.
Ah, so white and gold folks are, indeed, mistaken.
Thanks!
-
I've always really liked this explanation image you can find on Wikipedia page for it. Essentially, people who see white and gold are mistaking the lighting to be cold and blue-tinted, rather than warm and yellow-tinted.
The portions inside the boxes are the exact same colors, you can easily check this with a color picker.
Very interesting. I wonder how big the effect of culture is on how people perceive this situation
-
I still don’t see either. It looks blue and gold to me
Same. Initially white and gold, but now mostly blue and gold, although if I stare at it I can make it change back and forth.
-
Not even the brighter version looks white and gold to me. It's so obviously blue and black, y'all are insane.
Same, I see light blue and still black
-
Not even the brighter version looks white and gold to me. It's so obviously blue and black, y'all are insane.
I'm the opposite, the OG photo reads white and gold no matter what edits I see. Even after seeing the dress in proper light the OG is still white and gold.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I love the way everyone was saying it was white and gold.
Until the science came out.
And everyone claimed to have always seen blue and black.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
I never really understood the debate. In reality, if you were standing in front of the dress it is black and blue. Now, if you take a digital photo of the dress and post it on the internet as a terribly compressed jpg, with weird white balancing, and brightness/contrast turned up and down it is gold and white. The debate isn't really about the reality of the color of the dress but the reality of a badly edited photo.
-
I love the way everyone was saying it was white and gold.
Until the science came out.
And everyone claimed to have always seen blue and black.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Fun fact: I can see both.
Some times when I look at it it’s blue and black. Some times when I look at it it’s white and gold. I can make them flip back and forth.
Altering perception is cool.
-
Because no one has posted the other photos:
And this is a photo of the same dress taken under proper lighting:
Even with my phone cranked all the way up it still looks blue to me. I've never been able to see the white and gold version people claim exists.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I've only ever seen it as blue and black. I can't force it the other way like I could with Laurel and Yani. Y'all seeing white and gold astound me.
-
I've only ever seen it as blue and black. I can't force it the other way like I could with Laurel and Yani. Y'all seeing white and gold astound me.
Crazy talk. White and gold only
-
I never really understood the debate. In reality, if you were standing in front of the dress it is black and blue. Now, if you take a digital photo of the dress and post it on the internet as a terribly compressed jpg, with weird white balancing, and brightness/contrast turned up and down it is gold and white. The debate isn't really about the reality of the color of the dress but the reality of a badly edited photo.
Is it, though? Is this dress in the pic only white and gold to everyone who looks at the picture/the original?
-
I've always really liked this explanation image you can find on Wikipedia page for it. Essentially, people who see white and gold are mistaking the lighting to be cold and blue-tinted, rather than warm and yellow-tinted.
The portions inside the boxes are the exact same colors, you can easily check this with a color picker.
But the dress in the photo looks like it's in the shadow so it's a fair assumption that the lighting would be blue-tinted.
-
Not even the brighter version looks white and gold to me. It's so obviously blue and black, y'all are insane.
What on earth are you talking about.
Only the 'darker' picture looks remotely blue and black
-
I'm still convinced this is the biggest troll. It's clearly white and gold
When the discussion started, I saw white and gold too. Then, at some point, I saw blue and black and since then I've never been able to see it as white and gold again.
-
This post did not contain any content.
…shortly after, the internet broke people’s brains though addictive feed algorithms and everyone lost their minds. But then Lemmy was born to restore the internet to an early more fun time. Lemmy just hopes that one day it will have its own dress moment.
-
The second photo is supposed to be the same dress? Looks like an homage, aka knock-off attempt to me. What happened to the shoulders?
Doesn't look like the shoulder material is physically part of the dress... it's probably a jacket or shaul.
