Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. memes
  3. Who remembers this?

Who remembers this?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved memes
468 Posts 253 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A [email protected]

    The College of Optometrists came out and said it was ambigious. It's the point of the image dumbass. It's not about good spatial awareness. All you're demonstrating is lack of basic perception.

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #461

    Ah yes, I lack perception because I can see more things than you do, and they lead me to correct conclusions about the state of the world. That makes complete sense.

    And Usain Bolt runs so fast because he has weak legs, obviously.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A [email protected]

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #462

      "What science"

      Proceeds to explain the science

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G [email protected]

        Ah yes, I lack perception because I can see more things than you do, and they lead me to correct conclusions about the state of the world. That makes complete sense.

        And Usain Bolt runs so fast because he has weak legs, obviously.

        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by [email protected]
        #463

        You lack perception because your level of understanding is childish. I’d put you at 7/8. It’s really quite illuminating how thick some people can be.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T [email protected]

          Don't forget Laurel and Yani!

          dakralter@thelemmy.clubD This user is from outside of this forum
          dakralter@thelemmy.clubD This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #464

          And the trainer.

          The dress was always blue and black to me (blue and copper tinged black really), but this one keeps switching from grey and mint to pink and white and then back again.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B [email protected]

            I don't get it. It's clearly white and gold. How can anyone see black and blue?

            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #465

            I know right? But the manufacturer says it's blue and black. They didn't make a white and gold one.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • liz@midwest.socialL [email protected]

              That is literally what the argument is caused by, adaptive perception to lighting conditions.

              M This user is from outside of this forum
              M This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #466

              That's less than half of the related concepts.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A [email protected]

                You lack perception because your level of understanding is childish. I’d put you at 7/8. It’s really quite illuminating how thick some people can be.

                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #467

                Most insults aren't the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. An insult is only an ad hominem when it's the entire substance of one's argument. Like you're doing right now, shit-for-brains.

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G [email protected]

                  Most insults aren't the same thing as an ad hominem fallacy. An insult is only an ad hominem when it's the entire substance of one's argument. Like you're doing right now, shit-for-brains.

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #468

                  It’s not though, read my comments again. Slowly if you’re struggling.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups