Exclusive: Saudi warned Iran to reach nuclear deal with Trump or risk Israeli strike
-
Saudi Arabia's defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials in Tehran last month: take President Donald Trump's offer to negotiate a nuclear agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.
Alarmed at the prospect of further instability in the region, Saudi Arabia's 89-year-old King Salman bin Abdulaziz dispatched his son, Prince Khalid bin Salman, with the warning destined for Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to two Gulf sources close to government circles and two Iranian officials.
Prince Khalid, who was Saudi ambassador to Washington during Trump's first term, warned Iranian officials that the U.S. leader has little patience for drawn-out negotiations, according to the four sources.
-
Saudi Arabia's defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials in Tehran last month: take President Donald Trump's offer to negotiate a nuclear agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.
Alarmed at the prospect of further instability in the region, Saudi Arabia's 89-year-old King Salman bin Abdulaziz dispatched his son, Prince Khalid bin Salman, with the warning destined for Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to two Gulf sources close to government circles and two Iranian officials.
Prince Khalid, who was Saudi ambassador to Washington during Trump's first term, warned Iranian officials that the U.S. leader has little patience for drawn-out negotiations, according to the four sources.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Something tells me Saudi don't want Iran to have nukes.
Perhaps Iran could turntables by promising to share their nuclear program with Saudi. -
Saudi Arabia's defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials in Tehran last month: take President Donald Trump's offer to negotiate a nuclear agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.
Alarmed at the prospect of further instability in the region, Saudi Arabia's 89-year-old King Salman bin Abdulaziz dispatched his son, Prince Khalid bin Salman, with the warning destined for Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to two Gulf sources close to government circles and two Iranian officials.
Prince Khalid, who was Saudi ambassador to Washington during Trump's first term, warned Iranian officials that the U.S. leader has little patience for drawn-out negotiations, according to the four sources.
The people who would be most harmed by a nuclear armed Iranian regime are the Iranian people.
This is what Iran looked like before the ayatollahs took over. Successfully removing a nuclear-armed, religious-fundamentalist government is orders of magnitude more difficult for the people. The whole world will suffer, but no one more than the people of Iran themselves.
-
The people who would be most harmed by a nuclear armed Iranian regime are the Iranian people.
This is what Iran looked like before the ayatollahs took over. Successfully removing a nuclear-armed, religious-fundamentalist government is orders of magnitude more difficult for the people. The whole world will suffer, but no one more than the people of Iran themselves.
Do you really think israel and the west really care about regular iranians? Don't misinterpret my comment as a defence to iranian autocracy
-
The people who would be most harmed by a nuclear armed Iranian regime are the Iranian people.
This is what Iran looked like before the ayatollahs took over. Successfully removing a nuclear-armed, religious-fundamentalist government is orders of magnitude more difficult for the people. The whole world will suffer, but no one more than the people of Iran themselves.
Good thing there is literally no evidence Iran is trying to obtain nuclear weapons then. Also not to defend the Ayatollahs, but you do realize that the Shah was also running a one-party dictatorship right? Like, there's a reason the Iranian revolution happened.
Successfully removing a nuclear-armed, religious-fundamentalist government is orders of magnitude more difficult for the people.
Uh... not really, no. Nukes only matter for regime change by military force, which as seen in Iraq and Afghanistan is a bad idea no matter how you slice it. Those nukes, if they ever exist, are never going to be pointed at the Iranian people, so they have no reason to fear them.
-
The people who would be most harmed by a nuclear armed Iranian regime are the Iranian people.
This is what Iran looked like before the ayatollahs took over. Successfully removing a nuclear-armed, religious-fundamentalist government is orders of magnitude more difficult for the people. The whole world will suffer, but no one more than the people of Iran themselves.
This is what Iran looked like before
the ayatollahs took overthe USA deposed the democratically government that ruled Iran in the 50s and installed a puppet in its place, that ruled until the religious nuts deposed them in 1979 -
Good thing there is literally no evidence Iran is trying to obtain nuclear weapons then. Also not to defend the Ayatollahs, but you do realize that the Shah was also running a one-party dictatorship right? Like, there's a reason the Iranian revolution happened.
Successfully removing a nuclear-armed, religious-fundamentalist government is orders of magnitude more difficult for the people.
Uh... not really, no. Nukes only matter for regime change by military force, which as seen in Iraq and Afghanistan is a bad idea no matter how you slice it. Those nukes, if they ever exist, are never going to be pointed at the Iranian people, so they have no reason to fear them.
literally no evidence Iran is trying to obtain nuclear weapons
Either incredibly uninformed or abject misinformation:
No 'credible civilian' purpose for Iran uranium France 24, 2024
