Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Europe
  3. According to Tipalti, Apple as a company makes over $157 Billion per day.

According to Tipalti, Apple as a company makes over $157 Billion per day.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Europe
5 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J This user is from outside of this forum
    J This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    According to Tipalti, Apple as a company makes over $157 Billion per day. I don't think these fines exist for the elite.

    Didn't Microsoft just keep paying fines back in the day, as they could afford it or am I remembering some sort of fever dream?

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • System shared this topic on
    • J [email protected]

      According to Tipalti, Apple as a company makes over $157 Billion per day. I don't think these fines exist for the elite.

      Didn't Microsoft just keep paying fines back in the day, as they could afford it or am I remembering some sort of fever dream?

      H This user is from outside of this forum
      H This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Aside from whether these fines are high enough, it does at least send a message. I'm glad the EU is able to enforce the laws they have.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • H [email protected]

        Aside from whether these fines are high enough, it does at least send a message. I'm glad the EU is able to enforce the laws they have.

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        EU fines generally have a bad track record when it comes to stopping companies from trying to get away with stuff, but they do have an excellent track record when it comes to making them stop.

        Differently put: You won't see the EU levy another fine against Apple for this because Apple doesn't fancy getting slapped with a 40bn fine. If your main armament is big enough all you'll ever need is shots before the bow.

        H 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • B [email protected]

          EU fines generally have a bad track record when it comes to stopping companies from trying to get away with stuff, but they do have an excellent track record when it comes to making them stop.

          Differently put: You won't see the EU levy another fine against Apple for this because Apple doesn't fancy getting slapped with a 40bn fine. If your main armament is big enough all you'll ever need is shots before the bow.

          H This user is from outside of this forum
          H This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I like that metaphor. So you're saying the EU chooses to have low fines because the companies receiving them understand it could be way worse if they choose to continue?

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • H [email protected]

            I like that metaphor. So you're saying the EU chooses to have low fines because the companies receiving them understand it could be way worse if they choose to continue?

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Well, it's sufficient. Using larger calibres for the opening salvo would increase the risk of companies succeeding in fighting fines before court, and companies generally have some kind of creative interpretation of the law at the ready to justify what they're doing. Fining companies into bankruptcy or out of competition for a first offence is rather hard to justify, for repeat offenders, though? Companies continuing their behaviour after having received a warning fine have no excuse, now the gloves come off otherwise you're perceived as a paper tiger.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups