Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. "Anti-porn" payment processofs has hit itch.io

"Anti-porn" payment processofs has hit itch.io

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
news
10 Posts 4 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Ngl, terrifying stuff. What's gonna be banned?

    lvxferre@mander.xyzL dragonsidedd@monero.townD 3 Replies Last reply
    39
    • cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC [email protected]

      Ngl, terrifying stuff. What's gonna be banned?

      lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
      lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by [email protected]
      #2

      [itch dot io] "To ensure that we can continue to operate and provide a marketplace for all developers, we must prioritise our relationship with our payment partners and take immediate steps towards compliance."

      Emphasis mine. Why are they calling those mafias "partners"?

      Even if most of the blame should be geared towards the Christians in Collective Shout and the greedy PP/MC/Visa mafia, itch dot io should get part of the blame too.

      cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
      10
      • lvxferre@mander.xyzL [email protected]

        [itch dot io] "To ensure that we can continue to operate and provide a marketplace for all developers, we must prioritise our relationship with our payment partners and take immediate steps towards compliance."

        Emphasis mine. Why are they calling those mafias "partners"?

        Even if most of the blame should be geared towards the Christians in Collective Shout and the greedy PP/MC/Visa mafia, itch dot io should get part of the blame too.

        cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
        cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        I don't think they should get any of the blame?
        If the payment processors just refuse them - then itch.io will just shut down. it won't be able to pay for servers, workers or anything.

        lvxferre@mander.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
        7
        • cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC [email protected]

          I don't think they should get any of the blame?
          If the payment processors just refuse them - then itch.io will just shut down. it won't be able to pay for servers, workers or anything.

          lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
          lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Read the statement linked in the article. Focus on the words itch dot io used there:

          • "we came under scrutiny [pressure]"
          • "directing concerns [demands] to our payment processors"
          • "prioritize our relationship [dependence] with our payment partners [providers]"

          The only reasonable explanation for the presence of those euphemisms in the statement is, that the people in charge of itch dot io aren't even trying to fight back. They're painting the MC/Visa/PP mafia as "concerned partners". Like a dog a bit too eager to waggle its tail to its master.

          That's why I'm assigning at least some blame to the platform. Less than the payment mafia, and way less than the conservative nutjobs; but they are not guiltless IMO.

          cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC S 2 Replies Last reply
          11
          • lvxferre@mander.xyzL [email protected]

            Read the statement linked in the article. Focus on the words itch dot io used there:

            • "we came under scrutiny [pressure]"
            • "directing concerns [demands] to our payment processors"
            • "prioritize our relationship [dependence] with our payment partners [providers]"

            The only reasonable explanation for the presence of those euphemisms in the statement is, that the people in charge of itch dot io aren't even trying to fight back. They're painting the MC/Visa/PP mafia as "concerned partners". Like a dog a bit too eager to waggle its tail to its master.

            That's why I'm assigning at least some blame to the platform. Less than the payment mafia, and way less than the conservative nutjobs; but they are not guiltless IMO.

            cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
            cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Valve just did the same thing. Valve who's pretty famous for fighting back did the same thing.

            Those words are lawyer words. Not truth, lawyer words. I surely doubt itchio would come away scot free if they went to the press and said that they were forced

            lvxferre@mander.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
            11
            • cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC [email protected]

              Valve just did the same thing. Valve who's pretty famous for fighting back did the same thing.

              Those words are lawyer words. Not truth, lawyer words. I surely doubt itchio would come away scot free if they went to the press and said that they were forced

              lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
              lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Valve just did the same thing. Valve who’s pretty famous for fighting back did the same thing.

              C'mon, that's whataboutism. Let's focus on itch.io.

              Those words are lawyer words. Not truth, lawyer words.

              Yes. And I'm blaming them for that.

              I surely doubt itchio would come away scot free if they went to the press and said that they were forced

              The payment mafia is all about "brand damage". If itch io said the truth in the statement, while still complying with their threat, I don't think the mafia would cut it off - because doing it would bring a lot of brand damage to the mafia.

              "Look at itch io! You can't even criticise the payment mafia, it'll get in your way! We need to rely on alternative payment systems!" is a situation even the payment mafia would want to avoid.

              1 Reply Last reply
              7
              • lvxferre@mander.xyzL [email protected]

                Read the statement linked in the article. Focus on the words itch dot io used there:

                • "we came under scrutiny [pressure]"
                • "directing concerns [demands] to our payment processors"
                • "prioritize our relationship [dependence] with our payment partners [providers]"

                The only reasonable explanation for the presence of those euphemisms in the statement is, that the people in charge of itch dot io aren't even trying to fight back. They're painting the MC/Visa/PP mafia as "concerned partners". Like a dog a bit too eager to waggle its tail to its master.

                That's why I'm assigning at least some blame to the platform. Less than the payment mafia, and way less than the conservative nutjobs; but they are not guiltless IMO.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                I don't think you understand what being squeezed is like. There is no fighting back when you have no options.

                lvxferre@mander.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • S [email protected]

                  I don't think you understand what being squeezed is like. There is no fighting back when you have no options.

                  lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  I don’t think you understand what being squeezed is like.

                  What you said boils down to "I assume you're an ignorant", it doesn't contribute with the discussion.

                  Focus on what is said, instead of assuming things about who says it.

                  There is no fighting back when you have no options.

                  I already addressed this in another comment in this comment chain.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC [email protected]

                    Ngl, terrifying stuff. What's gonna be banned?

                    lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lvxferre@mander.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    Sorry for the double-reply but I'll focus here on different matters, ok?

                    I think "we" (people in general) should be doing a few things:

                    1. Pressuring governments to implement laws that prevent Visa/MC/PP from doing what they're doing. As I mentioned in another thread, I don't even think Visa/MC/PP would fight against that; if anything this would make them immune to pressure from those groups.
                    2. Pressuring Visa/MC/PP directly. There are petitions around that already; we should be supporting them, and creating more as necessary.
                    3. Spreading awareness of the real motivations of Collective Shout group. No, they aren't trying to "protect women", "protect children" or whatever - they're religious nutjobs trying to push the Overton Window to the right, until even non-erotic LGBTQ+ content gets banned from those platforms.
                    4. Support platforms that don't cave in to demands, in detriment of platforms that do.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC [email protected]

                      Ngl, terrifying stuff. What's gonna be banned?

                      dragonsidedd@monero.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dragonsidedd@monero.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      I cry for the world that could have been, if Tor and Monero gained widespread adoption

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups