Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Ask Lemmy
  3. What was the articulation point of the fall of the Roman empire, in which it was finally publicly and commonly recognized as fallen

What was the articulation point of the fall of the Roman empire, in which it was finally publicly and commonly recognized as fallen

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Ask Lemmy
asklemmy
24 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C [email protected]

    What evidence or sign became apparent that it was over?

    thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Consider this.... The Roman Empire still exists through Catholicism with Vatican City (in the city of Rome) as its seat of power.

    bahnd@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.orgT [email protected]

      Consider this.... The Roman Empire still exists through Catholicism with Vatican City (in the city of Rome) as its seat of power.

      bahnd@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
      bahnd@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      They got conquered... Multiple times, (not permenently, but rome has been brunt down a few times) in terms of organizations of power that were formed from the Roman Empire and were never kicked over, I would argue it would be the orthodox christians in Finland, Norway and Sweden. (Blame the soviets for why that list is small)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C [email protected]

        What evidence or sign became apparent that it was over?

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
        #17

        It's pretty much memetic that there is no agreed-on date.

        Like, you could go 1456 and not be wrong, and in multiple ways Russia inherited a lot of Byzantium. At the other end, Rome was in decline loong before it was sacked, like centuries, and actually had had brushes with instability all along in it's Empire period, like the year of four emperors in 69.

        Edit: One of the mentioned memes.

        when you fall down the stairs, do you timestamp the moment you tripped, the moment you landed at the bottom, or every moment you hit each and every step on the way down?

        D C 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • C [email protected]

          It's pretty much memetic that there is no agreed-on date.

          Like, you could go 1456 and not be wrong, and in multiple ways Russia inherited a lot of Byzantium. At the other end, Rome was in decline loong before it was sacked, like centuries, and actually had had brushes with instability all along in it's Empire period, like the year of four emperors in 69.

          Edit: One of the mentioned memes.

          when you fall down the stairs, do you timestamp the moment you tripped, the moment you landed at the bottom, or every moment you hit each and every step on the way down?

          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          The only people that say Russia inherited Byzantium are the Russians, and the people who definitely wouldn't have agreed are the Byzantines, once they figured out you were talking about them with that nonsense made-up word instead of an actual translation of "Roman"

          Tl;d saying Russia inherited Rome is as valid and accurate as saying the Germans are the heirs of the Aryans, and the people saying either have similar goals.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D [email protected]

            The only people that say Russia inherited Byzantium are the Russians, and the people who definitely wouldn't have agreed are the Byzantines, once they figured out you were talking about them with that nonsense made-up word instead of an actual translation of "Roman"

            Tl;d saying Russia inherited Rome is as valid and accurate as saying the Germans are the heirs of the Aryans, and the people saying either have similar goals.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Remind me where the eastern Church moved, when Byzantium was still there but in decline? There's also the cultural and aristocratic connections.

            Like, you can easily argue the other way as well, since they're not Greek, but it's not as totally groundless as most of Russian nationalism.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C [email protected]

              Remind me where the eastern Church moved, when Byzantium was still there but in decline? There's also the cultural and aristocratic connections.

              Like, you can easily argue the other way as well, since they're not Greek, but it's not as totally groundless as most of Russian nationalism.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Okay buddy Russian

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D [email protected]

                Okay buddy Russian

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                It's the facts. You don't have to pay any attention to them if you don't want, I guess.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C [email protected]

                  It's the facts. You don't have to pay any attention to them if you don't want, I guess.

                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                  #22

                  Got em right from RT so they and all conclusions derived from them must be true amirite

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C [email protected]

                    It's pretty much memetic that there is no agreed-on date.

                    Like, you could go 1456 and not be wrong, and in multiple ways Russia inherited a lot of Byzantium. At the other end, Rome was in decline loong before it was sacked, like centuries, and actually had had brushes with instability all along in it's Empire period, like the year of four emperors in 69.

                    Edit: One of the mentioned memes.

                    when you fall down the stairs, do you timestamp the moment you tripped, the moment you landed at the bottom, or every moment you hit each and every step on the way down?

                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    The pope holds a title associated with the roman emperor and controlled Rome until the unification of Italy.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • C [email protected]

                      The pope holds a title associated with the roman emperor and controlled Rome until the unification of Italy.

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                      #24

                      Yeah, but there was a 3 century break before the the local Germanic rulers decided to give it to the pope as a temporal domain.

                      The Church in general is a solid example of a way Rome lived on very directly and relevantly after Roman period ended, it's a good point. It's also why we still have so much of their literature, while that of Parthia is lost. And I should mention that the Byzantine emperor Justinian got close to bringing the western half of the empire back.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups