Why don't the whole planet just use UTC+00:00 / Universal Time without time zones?
-
to even continue this conversation intelligently.
citation needed
You don't understand what the word "arbitrary" means, lol.
I haven't laughed this hard in weeks.
I. Don't. Have. A. System.
With your imagined system of "if everyone had always lived with random ass times they would feel as normal as they do now".
No, they wouldn't, because unlike your ignorant-ass thinks, they aren't arbitrary. You don't understand the basic history of timekeeping and you have an utterly childish point, which is also wrong. Yes I know you're not directly proposing the use of another system, implications exist. You're just backing up on everything you've said after I rub your face in how stupid it's been, then you pretend you don't have a face full of poo.
It's ridiculous.
I speak 2 languages on a native level, one or two more fluently and a half a dozen in a "I could order in a restaurant" level. I'm pretty sure I know more expressions about time in more languages than you. How many languages do you speak?
it's entirely likely that you won't be able to read the words on the sign
This is why I keep replying. You're hilariously ironic. Remember you insisting how "numbers are inherently meaningless"? Scripts and languages change, sure, but most of the world uses Arabic numerals.
It doesn't matter if you don't know the local language or "what time local noon is" or even if they're using the same alphabet, you'll still recognise a number like 14:00 - 03:00 and then look up at the sky and it's not yet noon and you'll know you'll have to wait several hours at least.With as with an actually arbitrary system you might see numbers like 0748-5531 and have no fucking idea if it's even a time or even if it is a time, what time it's referring to, even if you know it's exactly midday.
But you'll not admit that laughable. Which in itself amuses me.
That there's what we call a tautology.
No shit, that's why I'm laughing at you. You're pretending like "noon" means nine because of its etymology, as in you're pretending as if you understand linguistics, when you don't understand that ignoring it's actual descriptive meaning of "mid-day" (which is why it's "high noon, because that's describing the position of the sun) is something even a first year linguist would never do. Hell, even if you had just read the basic wiki entry you'd know how ridiculous that is. But you're not about learning, you're about pretending you know things.
I'm saying that the numbers we've assigned to it are
And I'm saying you are wrong in that. Because you are. You are wrong in saying that. Do you understand? You are incorrect. It is not arbitrary. Even the number 12 isn't arbitrary, neither is 24 or 100. That's not what the word means, sweetums.
Not sure what you're talking about
Yes, I'm perfectly aware. Watching you prance around pretending to be smart is like watching toddlers bake mud cakes. It's cute how they think they're doing a credible job and you just have to act along so they can enjoy themselves.
..eh? I'm very clearly not being prescriptivis
Honestly you're literally making my sides hurt
Oh I'm not going anywhere, hunny. You're better entertainment than this show I'm watching.
You don't understand what the word "arbitrary" means, lol.
Well, if you said it, it must be true.
With your imagined system of "if everyone had always lived with random ass times they would feel as normal as they do now".
So wait, is this a pivot, or are you still trying to claim that I'm advocating for this? I have completely lost track of what you're framing your abusive posts on now.
Anyway, your imagined system of "somehow the fact that the time when people wake up is called 0600 is inherent to our biology or orbital dynamics or whatever" is absolutely not more logical than the system that the OP has asked about. It's just as arbitrary (hey, yeah, look, I still know what that means!).
You don't understand the basic history of timekeeping
Once again proving that you haven't read the previous posts I've made. Come on, dude. Simple reading. That's all I'm asking for.
and you have an utterly childish point, which is also wrong.
You have yet to actually prove this. Made lots of assertions, but you're just screaming "nuh-uh! YOU are!" over and over at this point and then spiking the conversational football as if it does anything.
You're just backing up on everything you've said after I rub your face in how stupid it's been, then you pretend you don't have a face full of poo.
Finally discovering what I was actually saying because you actually decided to go back and read it this time doesn't count as "backing up." I've been saying the same thing this whole time.
I speak 2 languages on a native level, one or two more fluently and a half a dozen in a "I could order in a restaurant" level. I'm pretty sure I know more expressions about time in more languages than you. How many languages do you speak?
...congratulations? I'm not sure how that's relevant in any way to anything. If it's really important to you: you're very smart and special. I bet you make your parents proud.
It doesn't matter if you don't know the local language or "what time local noon is" or even if they're using the same alphabet, you'll still recognise a number like 14:00 - 03:00 and then look up at the sky and it's not yet noon and you'll know you'll have to wait several hours at least.
Maybe. Or you'll walk up to the door of a veterinarian and wait around for five hours before you realize that people are bringing animals into the place, not walking out with food. There's also the problem of not knowing whether it's before noon or after noon (so a sign that says they're open for lunch from 1000-1800 would be useless if the sun is in a position where it could easily be 0700 or 1900). Or not being able to see the sun due to clouds or night or being inside. What I'm saying is that there are bigger problems involved in the situation you brought up, which is why I doubt anyone would care to solve the time problem. In this fictional, made-up world where the history of timekeeping went a little bit differently. Which you've somehow decided merits insulting me, despite you not actually having an argument that makes any logical sense. (Or at least not one you're willing to share with the class)
But you'll not admit that laughable. Which in itself amuses me.
I admit it's absolutely laughable! You know what else is absolutely laughable? The idea that the current system makes any more sense! If you're trying to coordinate an event with someone just a few miles away but across a time zone boundary in our current system, you have to go to great pains to sort everything out and make sure nobody arrives an hour early or an hour late. Or, even worse, two hours early (which happened once to a friend of mine when he did the time zone math backwards). Despite being just miles apart, and not being able to see any appreciable visible difference between the sun. That's laughable, too.
"Oh, but we have tools to deal with it" or "oh, but we can figure it out" or "oh, git gud, noob"--and yeah, we're used to it because we grew up with it and our parents grew up with it and our teachers grew up with it for generations and generations. If it had gone the other way, we would've developed different tools to deal with it, different ways of figuring it out, and we would've gotten good at other ways of keeping time. That's literally my entire point.
All of this is laughable. It's all arbitrary (yep, still got it) and hilarious because we made it all up. All models are wrong (including timekeeping). Some are useful.
You're pretending like "noon" means nine because of its etymology, as in you're pretending as if you understand linguistics, when you don't understand that ignoring it's actual descriptive meaning of "mid-day" (which is why it's "high noon, because that's describing the position of the sun) is something even a first year linguist would never do.
Your refusal to read in favor of just assuming what I mean is showing again.
But you're not about learning, you're about pretending you know things.
Aw, buddy. You think you're teaching me anything? If you had anything to teach me, that would be a welcome change. I love learning things. But you seem to be in "dunk mode" and absolutely furious that I keep refusing to let you dunk on me.
And I'm saying you are wrong in that. Because you are. You are wrong in saying that. Do you understand? You are incorrect. It is not arbitrary. Even the number 12 isn't arbitrary, neither is 24 or 100. That's not what the word means, sweetums.
You seriously think that assigning 12 to "noon" is inherent, babycakes? You literally believe that there's no other way that we could've matched up numbers to the time of day, pumpkin? Like there's not other ways of keeping time that used different numbers or even words instead of the digits you're familiar with on the clocks you own, honeybunch?
We agreed on 1200 as noon. That's why it works, and that's the only reason it works. If we had decided that noon would be 0000 or 1800 or "the sixth hour" or whatever, you'd be screaming your pretty little head off that I'm ridiculous for suggesting that 1200 makes as much sense as anything else. The decision has historical precedent, but it's scientifically arbitrary (boom, still know that word). The planet doesn't care whether we call it 1200 or d3:12:1h::23 or Xylophone, it'll still rotate to put us under the sun at that time.
Yes, I'm perfectly aware. Watching you prance around pretending to be smart is like watching toddlers bake mud cakes. It's cute how they think they're doing a credible job and you just have to act along so they can enjoy themselves.
Having been a parent of a toddler, I can tell you it's definitely nothing like that. For one thing, toddlers baking mud cakes is adorable, and I definitely am not adorable.
Oh I'm not going anywhere, hunny. You're better entertainment than this show I'm watching.
I'm so happy to be of service, sweetie-pie. You have a great day now, 'k?
-
You know, just because your short term memory is only ten seconds long, there's no need to rewrite the whole conversation everytime.
Or did you never develop object permanence and you literally can't answer a thing if it's not under your eyes, because you'll forget it exists?
No, it's "you can't just unilaterally decide that I actually mean the opposite of what I'm saying."
When you're saying hot is cold and up is down, I haven't decided that your words mean the opposite. You're just wrong.
Noon, midday or the number of hours is anything but arbitrary. You being ignorant of the reason doesn't make you right, it makes you ignorant. Notice anything about the divisibility of the numbers? No...? Oh right, you're probably American, so that's probably offensive to ask you about your maths skills. Apologies, I do understand your country is going through a tough time.
I don't decide the meaning of your words. The world sort of does.
I don't know what to tell you, bro. We have twelve hours because the ancient Egyptians liked the stars. That's just reality. I'd love to hear why you think it is, though.
Like I said, I'm not your history teacher, and you are just completely ignorant of the subject. You have to know how dumb you are though, but your ego just keeps ripping right through.
See I could teach you. Then you'd pretend you knew it all the time. You're just a pseudointellectual lazy piece of shit who doesn't know the first thing about the subject and didn't even click "timekeeping in other cultures" when he did his pathetic Wikipedia browsing. Which is exactly why you insist on your silly kittle ignorance.
You're plain wrong. I will tell you eventually how badly, but now I'm just gonna sip on your dumb juice. So sweet.
Oh I haven't argued you at any point, and would never. I'd have an easier time teaching a dog to whistle, lol.
You know, just because your short term memory is only ten seconds long, there's no need to rewrite the whole conversation everytime.
Because of your stubborn refusal to actually read anything I've written, I copy it back down in hopes that you'll see your own words and actually continue reading beyond the end of the quote. Though, admittedly, it's not going well at the moment.
Noon, midday or the number of hours is anything but arbitrary.
Noon is not, correct. Midday is not, correct. But while the fact that we've assigned any particular celestial event a number is more logical than a horoscope, it's no less arbitrary. Are you truly suggesting that our lives would be significantly different if we all grew up in a world where a new day began at noon, and so we called noon 0000? Or if we began a new day when most people woke up, and so we indexed noon at 0600 so that people could wake up at 0000?
Yes, you going into that world from this one would be startled (or, judging by your tone here, deeply offended), but any version of you that grew up in that world would think it very normal and logical.
You being ignorant of the reason doesn't make you right, it makes you ignorant.
Interesting. Because I've given actual facts here proving me correct about the reason for these things, but you continue to assert that I'm wrong and there's definitely a reason (even though you won't say what it is).
Notice anything about the divisibility of the numbers? No...?
You mean the fact that 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6? That is a nifty coincidence, isn't it? Definitely super useful. Good thing the Egyptians liked twelve constellations, huh? But it wasn't in any way intentional. Might be why it caught on, though.
Apologies, I do understand your country is going through a tough time.
Thank you, I appreciate it. It, uh...it's not great over here.
Like I said, I'm not your history teacher, and you are just completely ignorant of the subject. You have to know how dumb you are though, but your ego just keeps ripping right through.
I just went to look it up and see if I'd somehow misremembered from the books I read a while back when I was hyperfocused on the subject. But lookie there! "In ancient Egypt the flooding of the Nile was, and still is, an important annual event, crucial for agriculture. It was accompanied by the rise of Sirius before the sunrise, and the appearance of 12 constellations across the night sky, to which the Egyptians assigned some significance. Influenced by this, the Egyptians divided the night into 12 equal intervals. These were seasonal hours, shorter in the summer than in the winter. Subsequently, the day was divided into intervals as well, which eventually became more important than the nightly intervals. These subdivisions of a day spread to Greece, and later to Rome." (emphasis mine)
Egyptians liked the stars and thought those 12 constellations were important, so they divided up the night into that many hours. Just like I said.
See I could teach you. Then you'd pretend you knew it all the time.
I probably wouldn't need to pretend, since you're pathologically resistant to actually reading what I write. In fact, you're probably going to reply to me about how "no, you idiot, it's because the Egyptians thought that a particular set of 12 constellations were important!" next, aren't you?
See, you keep on asserting your intelligence and telling me I'm wrong, but then just leaving the assertion there by itself and telling me to do my own research. It's not my job to prove your point for you, though. That's up to you.
You're just a pseudointellectual
I believe I already answered that assertion in the affirmative, yes.
and didn't even click "timekeeping in other cultures" when he did his pathetic Wikipedia browsing.
Actually I did click that one just now! and it proves that whole thing I said in some other comment about how other cultures have different timekeeping systems which means that it's not inherent and is actually totally arbitrary! But since you didn't read that, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you didn't know.
Which is exactly why you insist on your silly kittle ignorance.
Here's a dramatic paraphrase of our interaction so far.
Me: "I mean, A isn't any more or less logical than B."
You: "YOUR AN IDIOT A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B OMG YOU SHOULD BE SHOT"
Me: "What? That's a strange amount of rage for something so mild, but what reason do you have for your opinion?"
You: "LOL NO IM NOT MAD UR JUST TRIGGERED IDIOT. A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B AND I DONT NEED TO TELL YOU MY REASON BECAUSE YOUR SO DUMB YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIGURE IT OUT YOURSELF STUPIDHEAD. OMG YOUR SO MAD AND TRIGGERED LOLOLOLOL"
Me: "That...isn't actually a reason? See, here are a couple of reasons."
You: "SEE YOU DONT HAVE ANY REASONS AT ALL LOLOL TRIGGERED, A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B"
Me: "What? I just gave you reasons, did you not even see them? Here, have some more. And why do you keep yelling the same thing over and over again?"
You: "KEK YOU ARE IGNORANT, A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B, U DONT KNOW ANYTHING, DONT HAVE ANY REASONS LOLOLOL"
Me: "...blink twice if you're in danger, bro."
You're plain wrong. I will tell you eventually how badly, but now I'm just gonna sip on your dumb juice. So sweet.
Ok, this is going to sound like an insult, but it's actually an honest question: are you literally a pre-teen? Because all this time I had been assuming you're an adult, but if I'm dealing with a child I should probably recalibrate my expectations. It would certainly explain your ludicrous position, your bizarre rage disguised under the laughter, and the phrase "dumb juice."
-
You know, just because your short term memory is only ten seconds long, there's no need to rewrite the whole conversation everytime.
Because of your stubborn refusal to actually read anything I've written, I copy it back down in hopes that you'll see your own words and actually continue reading beyond the end of the quote. Though, admittedly, it's not going well at the moment.
Noon, midday or the number of hours is anything but arbitrary.
Noon is not, correct. Midday is not, correct. But while the fact that we've assigned any particular celestial event a number is more logical than a horoscope, it's no less arbitrary. Are you truly suggesting that our lives would be significantly different if we all grew up in a world where a new day began at noon, and so we called noon 0000? Or if we began a new day when most people woke up, and so we indexed noon at 0600 so that people could wake up at 0000?
Yes, you going into that world from this one would be startled (or, judging by your tone here, deeply offended), but any version of you that grew up in that world would think it very normal and logical.
You being ignorant of the reason doesn't make you right, it makes you ignorant.
Interesting. Because I've given actual facts here proving me correct about the reason for these things, but you continue to assert that I'm wrong and there's definitely a reason (even though you won't say what it is).
Notice anything about the divisibility of the numbers? No...?
You mean the fact that 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6? That is a nifty coincidence, isn't it? Definitely super useful. Good thing the Egyptians liked twelve constellations, huh? But it wasn't in any way intentional. Might be why it caught on, though.
Apologies, I do understand your country is going through a tough time.
Thank you, I appreciate it. It, uh...it's not great over here.
Like I said, I'm not your history teacher, and you are just completely ignorant of the subject. You have to know how dumb you are though, but your ego just keeps ripping right through.
I just went to look it up and see if I'd somehow misremembered from the books I read a while back when I was hyperfocused on the subject. But lookie there! "In ancient Egypt the flooding of the Nile was, and still is, an important annual event, crucial for agriculture. It was accompanied by the rise of Sirius before the sunrise, and the appearance of 12 constellations across the night sky, to which the Egyptians assigned some significance. Influenced by this, the Egyptians divided the night into 12 equal intervals. These were seasonal hours, shorter in the summer than in the winter. Subsequently, the day was divided into intervals as well, which eventually became more important than the nightly intervals. These subdivisions of a day spread to Greece, and later to Rome." (emphasis mine)
Egyptians liked the stars and thought those 12 constellations were important, so they divided up the night into that many hours. Just like I said.
See I could teach you. Then you'd pretend you knew it all the time.
I probably wouldn't need to pretend, since you're pathologically resistant to actually reading what I write. In fact, you're probably going to reply to me about how "no, you idiot, it's because the Egyptians thought that a particular set of 12 constellations were important!" next, aren't you?
See, you keep on asserting your intelligence and telling me I'm wrong, but then just leaving the assertion there by itself and telling me to do my own research. It's not my job to prove your point for you, though. That's up to you.
You're just a pseudointellectual
I believe I already answered that assertion in the affirmative, yes.
and didn't even click "timekeeping in other cultures" when he did his pathetic Wikipedia browsing.
Actually I did click that one just now! and it proves that whole thing I said in some other comment about how other cultures have different timekeeping systems which means that it's not inherent and is actually totally arbitrary! But since you didn't read that, I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you didn't know.
Which is exactly why you insist on your silly kittle ignorance.
Here's a dramatic paraphrase of our interaction so far.
Me: "I mean, A isn't any more or less logical than B."
You: "YOUR AN IDIOT A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B OMG YOU SHOULD BE SHOT"
Me: "What? That's a strange amount of rage for something so mild, but what reason do you have for your opinion?"
You: "LOL NO IM NOT MAD UR JUST TRIGGERED IDIOT. A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B AND I DONT NEED TO TELL YOU MY REASON BECAUSE YOUR SO DUMB YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIGURE IT OUT YOURSELF STUPIDHEAD. OMG YOUR SO MAD AND TRIGGERED LOLOLOLOL"
Me: "That...isn't actually a reason? See, here are a couple of reasons."
You: "SEE YOU DONT HAVE ANY REASONS AT ALL LOLOL TRIGGERED, A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B"
Me: "What? I just gave you reasons, did you not even see them? Here, have some more. And why do you keep yelling the same thing over and over again?"
You: "KEK YOU ARE IGNORANT, A IS OBVIOUSLY MORE LOGICAL THAN B, U DONT KNOW ANYTHING, DONT HAVE ANY REASONS LOLOLOL"
Me: "...blink twice if you're in danger, bro."
You're plain wrong. I will tell you eventually how badly, but now I'm just gonna sip on your dumb juice. So sweet.
Ok, this is going to sound like an insult, but it's actually an honest question: are you literally a pre-teen? Because all this time I had been assuming you're an adult, but if I'm dealing with a child I should probably recalibrate my expectations. It would certainly explain your ludicrous position, your bizarre rage disguised under the laughter, and the phrase "dumb juice."
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Wikipedia doesn't cover even the basics.
You keep writing essays because you're too fucking ashamed to admit you didn't understand what the word arbitrary means.
Remember how I've said, several times, that even your argument about 12, 24, 30 or 100 hour systems being "arbitrary" is wrong? Why not include that in your essay? Is it because you're ashamed of having been wrong, because you like to pretend to understand shit and pretend to be smart. Because online, there's no-one to mock you for it. Or, so you thought. ;>
You get angry because I refuse to give you the answers and the only place someone with your intelligence will look is fkin Wikipedia. The timekeeping in my culture isn't even mentioned there.
How many language did you speak again? ;>
I'll get back to you on your other pathetic essay tomorrow, just woke up to pee.
any particular celestial event a number is more logical than a horoscope, it's no less arbitrary
Again, just because you don't know the reason for a thing doesn't mean it doesn't exist, sweetums.
Oh no, you think you've "given facts", just like a child playing at kitchen with mudcakes has "actually cooked".
No [I don't notice anything about the divisibility of hours]...?
Again, just because YOU personally fail to see logic in something doesn't mean it doesn't have any. And it's just driving you mental having me not tell you the answers so you can pretend to have known all the time.
The fact you're writing every one of my "replies" as if I'm yelling it's just candy to my eyes, because it tells me you're fucking seething at me mocking you. Cheers bruv.
-
Wikipedia doesn't cover even the basics.
You keep writing essays because you're too fucking ashamed to admit you didn't understand what the word arbitrary means.
Remember how I've said, several times, that even your argument about 12, 24, 30 or 100 hour systems being "arbitrary" is wrong? Why not include that in your essay? Is it because you're ashamed of having been wrong, because you like to pretend to understand shit and pretend to be smart. Because online, there's no-one to mock you for it. Or, so you thought. ;>
You get angry because I refuse to give you the answers and the only place someone with your intelligence will look is fkin Wikipedia. The timekeeping in my culture isn't even mentioned there.
How many language did you speak again? ;>
I'll get back to you on your other pathetic essay tomorrow, just woke up to pee.
any particular celestial event a number is more logical than a horoscope, it's no less arbitrary
Again, just because you don't know the reason for a thing doesn't mean it doesn't exist, sweetums.
Oh no, you think you've "given facts", just like a child playing at kitchen with mudcakes has "actually cooked".
No [I don't notice anything about the divisibility of hours]...?
Again, just because YOU personally fail to see logic in something doesn't mean it doesn't have any. And it's just driving you mental having me not tell you the answers so you can pretend to have known all the time.
The fact you're writing every one of my "replies" as if I'm yelling it's just candy to my eyes, because it tells me you're fucking seething at me mocking you. Cheers bruv.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Wikipedia doesn't cover even the basics.
"Why don't you even look at Wikipedia?"
"UGH NO NOT LIKE THAT"
Bro, just admit that you're surprised I actually do know something about the history of timekeeping and we can move on. Or tell me where you think I'm wrong and we can move on. One way or another, this "huehue I know somethin u dont know" routine is getting really tired, so I'm going to start ignoring the unsourced nonsense.
You keep writing essays
Actually, they're a pretty standard length for me. I'm fairly verbose, and always have been.
you didn't understand what the word arbitrary means.
Unsupported assertions are definitely a great way to convince me, that's for sure. We've definitely proven that.
Remember how I've said, several times, that even your argument about 12, 24, 30 or 100 hour systems being "arbitrary" is wrong? Why not include that in your essay?
Said, yes. With no support or evidence for your claims, so I treat them as nonsense.
Is it because you're ashamed of having been wrong,
I absolutely love being proven wrong, actually! I like learning new things, and it totally floors people when I admit that they were right and apologize. But you have yet to actually prove literally anything, so I'm not particularly hopeful about that this time.
Because online, there's no-one to mock you for it. Or, so you thought. ;>
It's just random insults if you don't have any facts to back it up. You look like an abusive fool, rather than like you've won an argument. I've been in online arguments, in one forum or another, since like...1995? Earlier? Not sure. There are definitely always idiots around to mock me for what they think is being wrong.
You get angry
Not angry in the least. I'm having a great time.
because I refuse to give you the answers
Usually people with any evidence at all are super excited to provide it in defense of their point. The fact that you aren't even telling me what your evidence says indicates that you don't have any.
and the only place someone with your intelligence will look is fkin Wikipedia.
I read a book a while ago about the history of timekeeping. I honestly hadn't even seen the Wikipedia article until today.
The timekeeping in my culture isn't even mentioned there.
But wait! I thought everyone had an inherent understanding of the current worldwide timekeeping method! How could there possibly be any other cultures' timekeeping methods?
How many language did you speak again? ;>
Non sequitur.
I'll get back to you on your other pathetic essay tomorrow, just woke up to pee.
I'm honored.
Again, just because you don't know the reason for a thing doesn't mean it doesn't exist, sweetums.
Pretty sure I told you that, just a few comments ago.
No [I don't notice anything about the divisibility of hours]...?
You have completely mischaracterized my entire comment.
it's just driving you mental having me not tell you the answers so you can pretend to have known all the time.
No, I'm just more and more confident all the time that you don't actually have a point and are just hoping that I'll supply one for you in the process of trying to rebut your nonsense.
The fact you're writing every one of my "replies" as if I'm yelling it's just candy to my eyes,
You're the one that came in swinging with insults and name-calling. The fallacies are the logical equivalent of shouting and banging the table. I quote your replies because I've seen enough bad faith arguments from you that I wouldn't put it past you to just edit your comment or intentionally pretend like I'm responding to something I am not.
seething
You really are a pre-teen, aren't you?
Anyway, this one was way more boring than your usual. You keep on diving deeper and deeper into bad faith arguments, and that's just disappointing. You can do better than that.
-
Wikipedia doesn't cover even the basics.
"Why don't you even look at Wikipedia?"
"UGH NO NOT LIKE THAT"
Bro, just admit that you're surprised I actually do know something about the history of timekeeping and we can move on. Or tell me where you think I'm wrong and we can move on. One way or another, this "huehue I know somethin u dont know" routine is getting really tired, so I'm going to start ignoring the unsourced nonsense.
You keep writing essays
Actually, they're a pretty standard length for me. I'm fairly verbose, and always have been.
you didn't understand what the word arbitrary means.
Unsupported assertions are definitely a great way to convince me, that's for sure. We've definitely proven that.
Remember how I've said, several times, that even your argument about 12, 24, 30 or 100 hour systems being "arbitrary" is wrong? Why not include that in your essay?
Said, yes. With no support or evidence for your claims, so I treat them as nonsense.
Is it because you're ashamed of having been wrong,
I absolutely love being proven wrong, actually! I like learning new things, and it totally floors people when I admit that they were right and apologize. But you have yet to actually prove literally anything, so I'm not particularly hopeful about that this time.
Because online, there's no-one to mock you for it. Or, so you thought. ;>
It's just random insults if you don't have any facts to back it up. You look like an abusive fool, rather than like you've won an argument. I've been in online arguments, in one forum or another, since like...1995? Earlier? Not sure. There are definitely always idiots around to mock me for what they think is being wrong.
You get angry
Not angry in the least. I'm having a great time.
because I refuse to give you the answers
Usually people with any evidence at all are super excited to provide it in defense of their point. The fact that you aren't even telling me what your evidence says indicates that you don't have any.
and the only place someone with your intelligence will look is fkin Wikipedia.
I read a book a while ago about the history of timekeeping. I honestly hadn't even seen the Wikipedia article until today.
The timekeeping in my culture isn't even mentioned there.
But wait! I thought everyone had an inherent understanding of the current worldwide timekeeping method! How could there possibly be any other cultures' timekeeping methods?
How many language did you speak again? ;>
Non sequitur.
I'll get back to you on your other pathetic essay tomorrow, just woke up to pee.
I'm honored.
Again, just because you don't know the reason for a thing doesn't mean it doesn't exist, sweetums.
Pretty sure I told you that, just a few comments ago.
No [I don't notice anything about the divisibility of hours]...?
You have completely mischaracterized my entire comment.
it's just driving you mental having me not tell you the answers so you can pretend to have known all the time.
No, I'm just more and more confident all the time that you don't actually have a point and are just hoping that I'll supply one for you in the process of trying to rebut your nonsense.
The fact you're writing every one of my "replies" as if I'm yelling it's just candy to my eyes,
You're the one that came in swinging with insults and name-calling. The fallacies are the logical equivalent of shouting and banging the table. I quote your replies because I've seen enough bad faith arguments from you that I wouldn't put it past you to just edit your comment or intentionally pretend like I'm responding to something I am not.
seething
You really are a pre-teen, aren't you?
Anyway, this one was way more boring than your usual. You keep on diving deeper and deeper into bad faith arguments, and that's just disappointing. You can do better than that.
You literally don't know anything about the history of timekeeping. That's the point. You keep pretending to, because you've read a Wikipedia article. And you don't see why you're being ridiculed?
The systems which humanity have used have not been arbitrary and every single "argument" you've made showcases your stupidity and ignorance.
How many languages was it you spoke again?
Give me your address and I'll order a "grammar for kids" book and a dictionary for you. In English, as I presume it's the only language you sort of understand.
It's not about the length of your replies, it's about who they're formatted like a teenager with Alzheimer's.
What do you mean "no support for your claims about timekeeping systems not being arbitrary"? You can't be serious. You just can't. You still don't understand what the word arbitrary even means?
:DDdddddd
This is the best wake up comment I could've read. Put a laugh in my day right away hahaha thank you. Also I don't believe a person like you has read a single book in your entire life.
-
You don't understand what the word "arbitrary" means, lol.
Well, if you said it, it must be true.
With your imagined system of "if everyone had always lived with random ass times they would feel as normal as they do now".
So wait, is this a pivot, or are you still trying to claim that I'm advocating for this? I have completely lost track of what you're framing your abusive posts on now.
Anyway, your imagined system of "somehow the fact that the time when people wake up is called 0600 is inherent to our biology or orbital dynamics or whatever" is absolutely not more logical than the system that the OP has asked about. It's just as arbitrary (hey, yeah, look, I still know what that means!).
You don't understand the basic history of timekeeping
Once again proving that you haven't read the previous posts I've made. Come on, dude. Simple reading. That's all I'm asking for.
and you have an utterly childish point, which is also wrong.
You have yet to actually prove this. Made lots of assertions, but you're just screaming "nuh-uh! YOU are!" over and over at this point and then spiking the conversational football as if it does anything.
You're just backing up on everything you've said after I rub your face in how stupid it's been, then you pretend you don't have a face full of poo.
Finally discovering what I was actually saying because you actually decided to go back and read it this time doesn't count as "backing up." I've been saying the same thing this whole time.
I speak 2 languages on a native level, one or two more fluently and a half a dozen in a "I could order in a restaurant" level. I'm pretty sure I know more expressions about time in more languages than you. How many languages do you speak?
...congratulations? I'm not sure how that's relevant in any way to anything. If it's really important to you: you're very smart and special. I bet you make your parents proud.
It doesn't matter if you don't know the local language or "what time local noon is" or even if they're using the same alphabet, you'll still recognise a number like 14:00 - 03:00 and then look up at the sky and it's not yet noon and you'll know you'll have to wait several hours at least.
Maybe. Or you'll walk up to the door of a veterinarian and wait around for five hours before you realize that people are bringing animals into the place, not walking out with food. There's also the problem of not knowing whether it's before noon or after noon (so a sign that says they're open for lunch from 1000-1800 would be useless if the sun is in a position where it could easily be 0700 or 1900). Or not being able to see the sun due to clouds or night or being inside. What I'm saying is that there are bigger problems involved in the situation you brought up, which is why I doubt anyone would care to solve the time problem. In this fictional, made-up world where the history of timekeeping went a little bit differently. Which you've somehow decided merits insulting me, despite you not actually having an argument that makes any logical sense. (Or at least not one you're willing to share with the class)
But you'll not admit that laughable. Which in itself amuses me.
I admit it's absolutely laughable! You know what else is absolutely laughable? The idea that the current system makes any more sense! If you're trying to coordinate an event with someone just a few miles away but across a time zone boundary in our current system, you have to go to great pains to sort everything out and make sure nobody arrives an hour early or an hour late. Or, even worse, two hours early (which happened once to a friend of mine when he did the time zone math backwards). Despite being just miles apart, and not being able to see any appreciable visible difference between the sun. That's laughable, too.
"Oh, but we have tools to deal with it" or "oh, but we can figure it out" or "oh, git gud, noob"--and yeah, we're used to it because we grew up with it and our parents grew up with it and our teachers grew up with it for generations and generations. If it had gone the other way, we would've developed different tools to deal with it, different ways of figuring it out, and we would've gotten good at other ways of keeping time. That's literally my entire point.
All of this is laughable. It's all arbitrary (yep, still got it) and hilarious because we made it all up. All models are wrong (including timekeeping). Some are useful.
You're pretending like "noon" means nine because of its etymology, as in you're pretending as if you understand linguistics, when you don't understand that ignoring it's actual descriptive meaning of "mid-day" (which is why it's "high noon, because that's describing the position of the sun) is something even a first year linguist would never do.
Your refusal to read in favor of just assuming what I mean is showing again.
But you're not about learning, you're about pretending you know things.
Aw, buddy. You think you're teaching me anything? If you had anything to teach me, that would be a welcome change. I love learning things. But you seem to be in "dunk mode" and absolutely furious that I keep refusing to let you dunk on me.
And I'm saying you are wrong in that. Because you are. You are wrong in saying that. Do you understand? You are incorrect. It is not arbitrary. Even the number 12 isn't arbitrary, neither is 24 or 100. That's not what the word means, sweetums.
You seriously think that assigning 12 to "noon" is inherent, babycakes? You literally believe that there's no other way that we could've matched up numbers to the time of day, pumpkin? Like there's not other ways of keeping time that used different numbers or even words instead of the digits you're familiar with on the clocks you own, honeybunch?
We agreed on 1200 as noon. That's why it works, and that's the only reason it works. If we had decided that noon would be 0000 or 1800 or "the sixth hour" or whatever, you'd be screaming your pretty little head off that I'm ridiculous for suggesting that 1200 makes as much sense as anything else. The decision has historical precedent, but it's scientifically arbitrary (boom, still know that word). The planet doesn't care whether we call it 1200 or d3:12:1h::23 or Xylophone, it'll still rotate to put us under the sun at that time.
Yes, I'm perfectly aware. Watching you prance around pretending to be smart is like watching toddlers bake mud cakes. It's cute how they think they're doing a credible job and you just have to act along so they can enjoy themselves.
Having been a parent of a toddler, I can tell you it's definitely nothing like that. For one thing, toddlers baking mud cakes is adorable, and I definitely am not adorable.
Oh I'm not going anywhere, hunny. You're better entertainment than this show I'm watching.
I'm so happy to be of service, sweetie-pie. You have a great day now, 'k?
It's true, because it's true. You saying something is "arbitrary" because you don't understand the reason is very stupid indeed. Really American, I might say.
You talk about non-sequiturs (again like a teenager horny to pretend to be a philosopher who actually doesn't know jack shit), while arguing about age. It's hilarious.
You still don't know what "arbitrary" means. 12, 24, 30, even 100 hour systems are in no way arbitrary.
You don't understand what "implication" means either.
Damn, I could be having this conversation in several other languages, but I presume this is your "best" and all you manage is to whinge about how your mudcakes are actual food and stomp your food and cry on the ground until I pretend to eat one to make you happy.
No you haven't "read a book about timekeeping", you're just a kiddo American feeling mighty stupid that someone is mocking them.
Like I told you, I'll eventually tell you the answers, even though they're pretty damn obvious for people who have actually read books about timekeeping. I mean roflmao why the fuck would you think of such a childish lie? This is why America is ridiculed. Your president being what it is has given you a false sense of how much regulate people can get away with asinine bullshitting.
You brought up language skills, and now try to make it seem like you didn't think it important anyway. Seriously, I can't think of a more childish way of going about that.
Remember how you didn't notice anything about the divisibility of hours? Why are there no systems based on a prime number of hours, huh?
Oh I've read your posts. I'm just gonna keep you publicly shaming yourself so the bots have time to archive your stupidity for the rest of the world before you delete in all in an attack of shame when I finally do educate you
Or not being able to see the sun due to clouds or night or being inside
Surely you're not this fucking stupid. You just can't be.
"Hey is it day or night out?"
"Uh, I can't tell, it's so cloudy"
"Oh no, I'm inside, I have no way of knowing where the sun is, because all our buildings are shipping crates with no windows"
"Oh no, it's night, and all the markers in the sky are clearly visible, what to do now?"
You "read a book about timekeeping" recently.....?
I am not and have not argued you at any point. You are my entertainment. Just like I wouldn't fight a kid, I won't argue you.
You're still grossly misusing "arbitrary". I understand you're linguistically challenged so here:
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
adjective 1.
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system. -
You literally don't know anything about the history of timekeeping. That's the point. You keep pretending to, because you've read a Wikipedia article. And you don't see why you're being ridiculed?
The systems which humanity have used have not been arbitrary and every single "argument" you've made showcases your stupidity and ignorance.
How many languages was it you spoke again?
Give me your address and I'll order a "grammar for kids" book and a dictionary for you. In English, as I presume it's the only language you sort of understand.
It's not about the length of your replies, it's about who they're formatted like a teenager with Alzheimer's.
What do you mean "no support for your claims about timekeeping systems not being arbitrary"? You can't be serious. You just can't. You still don't understand what the word arbitrary even means?
:DDdddddd
This is the best wake up comment I could've read. Put a laugh in my day right away hahaha thank you. Also I don't believe a person like you has read a single book in your entire life.
You literally don't know anything about the history of timekeeping. That's the point.
Assertion isn't evidence. You have yet to actually say a single thing about why you think I'm wrong, just that you do. This is not how argumentation and debate work.
And you don't see why you're being ridiculed?
This isn't ridicule, it's just baseless name-calling. This is elementary school-level insults. If it were ridicule, it would have any evidence behind it at all. The longer you go without providing any basis for your claims, the more clear it becomes that you have none.
The systems which humanity have used have not been arbitrary
Every system humanity uses is arbitrary. We decide and agree that something arbitrary is useful, and then we decide to imbue that arbitrary thing with meaning.
Words didn't mean anything until we assigned meaning to them, and you can tell they're arbitrary because the same combination of syllables can mean something completely different in another language. For someone who claims to know multiple languages, you should be aware of that. Meters aren't meters because they have to be; we decided that the distance light travels in 0.000000003335641s is a useful amount of distance. We could've easily defined it as the distance light travels in 0.000000003335642s and it wouldn't be any more or less logical.
That's how humans work. We give arbitrary things meaning. You insisting that the shapes in the clouds are definitely sharks doesn't make them sharks. The shapes are arbitrary.
and every single "argument" you've made showcases your stupidity and ignorance.
Contrasted with the complete lack of argument you've made.
Give me your address and I'll order a "grammar for kids" book and a dictionary for you.
Aw, buddy, you already tried that insult once. And it wasn't funny the first time.
It's not about the length of your replies, it's about who they're formatted like a teenager with Alzheimer's.
Now that one's funny! Good job. I knew you could do it.
What do you mean "no support for your claims about timekeeping systems not being arbitrary"?
I mean, support your claims that there's something inherent about timekeeping systems. Something in our brains, or in the rotation of the Earth, or in the physical properties of light, or something that means that high noon has to be represented on the clock as 1200.
That's what "support" means. That's what evidence is. That's what any reasonable, good-faith argument has to include.
You still don't understand what the word arbitrary even means?
I am starting to think that you believe "arbitrary" means "random." But that isn't what it means. It means "randomly chosen," or perhaps "selected without impetus." The Egyptians didn't have to choose twelve constellations; nobody was forcing them to, and there wasn't anything inherent about them that required them to base a system of timekeeping around it.
This is the best wake up comment I could've read. Put a laugh in my day right away hahaha thank you.
You're welcome! I love knowing that I'm helping put some joy into the world.
Also I don't believe a person like you has read a single book in your entire life.
Oh, thanks for the reminder, I forgot to log the book I finished yesterday.
-
It's true, because it's true. You saying something is "arbitrary" because you don't understand the reason is very stupid indeed. Really American, I might say.
You talk about non-sequiturs (again like a teenager horny to pretend to be a philosopher who actually doesn't know jack shit), while arguing about age. It's hilarious.
You still don't know what "arbitrary" means. 12, 24, 30, even 100 hour systems are in no way arbitrary.
You don't understand what "implication" means either.
Damn, I could be having this conversation in several other languages, but I presume this is your "best" and all you manage is to whinge about how your mudcakes are actual food and stomp your food and cry on the ground until I pretend to eat one to make you happy.
No you haven't "read a book about timekeeping", you're just a kiddo American feeling mighty stupid that someone is mocking them.
Like I told you, I'll eventually tell you the answers, even though they're pretty damn obvious for people who have actually read books about timekeeping. I mean roflmao why the fuck would you think of such a childish lie? This is why America is ridiculed. Your president being what it is has given you a false sense of how much regulate people can get away with asinine bullshitting.
You brought up language skills, and now try to make it seem like you didn't think it important anyway. Seriously, I can't think of a more childish way of going about that.
Remember how you didn't notice anything about the divisibility of hours? Why are there no systems based on a prime number of hours, huh?
Oh I've read your posts. I'm just gonna keep you publicly shaming yourself so the bots have time to archive your stupidity for the rest of the world before you delete in all in an attack of shame when I finally do educate you
Or not being able to see the sun due to clouds or night or being inside
Surely you're not this fucking stupid. You just can't be.
"Hey is it day or night out?"
"Uh, I can't tell, it's so cloudy"
"Oh no, I'm inside, I have no way of knowing where the sun is, because all our buildings are shipping crates with no windows"
"Oh no, it's night, and all the markers in the sky are clearly visible, what to do now?"
You "read a book about timekeeping" recently.....?
I am not and have not argued you at any point. You are my entertainment. Just like I wouldn't fight a kid, I won't argue you.
You're still grossly misusing "arbitrary". I understand you're linguistically challenged so here:
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
adjective 1.
based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.It's true, because it's true.
A tautology isn't a reason, it's a logical fallacy. Maybe even a religion. This would be a really weird religion to have a holy war over.
saying something is "arbitrary" because you don't understand the reason
As opposed to just insisting that something isn't because you don't know the reason, like you seem to be doing? Prove me wrong. Provide any evidence. Or honestly even just a claim, a claim would at least be something worth discussing.
Really American, I might say.
Well, you're not wrong there.
You still don't know what "arbitrary" means. 12, 24, 30, even 100 hour systems are in no way arbitrary.
So they came from the universe factory with those meanings already imbued in them?
You don't understand what "implication" means either.
Come on, man. Make a claim. Even make a bogus claim. But don't just attack me for the fact that you don't understand my language.
all you manage is to whinge about how your mudcakes are actual food and stomp your food and cry on the ground until I pretend to eat one to make you happy.
Do I? You're the one that's been slinging insults since the moment you showed up, and "pretending to eat one" would mean telling me what you think is right instead of trying to verbally abuse me until I admit that you were right, even though you haven't actually said anything that could be right or wrong yet.
No you haven't "read a book about timekeeping",
Honestly now I'm wondering if it was a video series. I don't see it in my reading log anywhere. But it was a long time ago, so maybe it was before I started logging books.
you're just a kiddo American feeling mighty stupid that someone is mocking them.
You're not "mocking" me. You're shouting random nonsense from the opposing sidewalk and hoping that some of it makes sense.
Like I told you, I'll eventually tell you the answers,
Press X to doubt.
even though they're pretty damn obvious for people who have actually read books about timekeeping.
Then it should be pretty easy to point me toward one of these books, shouldn't it?
This is why America is ridiculed.
There are a lot of reasons why America is ridiculed, and most of them are justified.
You brought up language skills, and now try to make it seem like you didn't think it important anyway.
Pretty sure I never said anything about the number of languages one speaks being important.
Oh I've read your posts.
Citation needed.
I'm just gonna keep you publicly shaming yourself so the bots have time to archive your stupidity for the rest of the world before you delete in all in an attack of shame when I finally do educate you
Wow, you really don't know me.
"Hey is it day or night out?"
"Uh, I can't tell, it's so cloudy"
"Hey, when does this restaurant open?"
"The sign says 11:00, but I don't know what time it is. Or what day it is; it opens at 16:00 on Saturdays and not at all on Tuesdays."
"Well, I see by the sun that it's either a couple of hours before or after noon, or we're at an extreme edge of the time zone and it's exactly noon. So I guess rather than trying to find someone to ask or a restaurant that's clearly open, we should just wait in front of this door for an indeterminate amount of time."
You "read a book about timekeeping" recently.....?
If I said "recently," I misspoke. It was a long time ago.
I am not and have not argued you at any point.
This is literally what you're doing now. The first definition of "argument" is "an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one." I have a diverging view from you, apparently (even though you won't actually tell me what it is), and you're super heated about it for some reason.
You're still grossly misusing "arbitrary".
Based on the definition that you provided, I'm using it perfectly:
- based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
The choice to divide the day into twelve hours was based on the personal whim of the ancient Egyptians. They found a particular set of twelve constellations to be important, but by random choice they might well have found a different set of, say, eight constellations to be important. Or sixteen. Or ten.
The choice to begin the day (and thus the numbering of the day) twelve hours before noon was based on the personal whim of the Romans. Maybe they liked some aspects of the choice better than starting the day six hours before noon like Jewish rabbis did, or at noon itself. They may have justified it with a good reason, but the people who chose otherwise would have justified their choice with a good reason as well; so for humanity as a whole, it is arbitrary.
The choice to mark out time zones within which all hours are indexed to the local noon was also made on the personal whim of...some railroad guy (I can't remember his name) in the 19th century. He knew that the then-current system of every railway having their own time and every city along the railroad having a different local time was a bad idea (it was), but he could just as easily have chosen a UTC and suggested that the trains run on a truly universal UTC. Would it have caught on? Who knows? But we're presuming for the sake of this discussion a world in which it did.
-
You literally don't know anything about the history of timekeeping. That's the point.
Assertion isn't evidence. You have yet to actually say a single thing about why you think I'm wrong, just that you do. This is not how argumentation and debate work.
And you don't see why you're being ridiculed?
This isn't ridicule, it's just baseless name-calling. This is elementary school-level insults. If it were ridicule, it would have any evidence behind it at all. The longer you go without providing any basis for your claims, the more clear it becomes that you have none.
The systems which humanity have used have not been arbitrary
Every system humanity uses is arbitrary. We decide and agree that something arbitrary is useful, and then we decide to imbue that arbitrary thing with meaning.
Words didn't mean anything until we assigned meaning to them, and you can tell they're arbitrary because the same combination of syllables can mean something completely different in another language. For someone who claims to know multiple languages, you should be aware of that. Meters aren't meters because they have to be; we decided that the distance light travels in 0.000000003335641s is a useful amount of distance. We could've easily defined it as the distance light travels in 0.000000003335642s and it wouldn't be any more or less logical.
That's how humans work. We give arbitrary things meaning. You insisting that the shapes in the clouds are definitely sharks doesn't make them sharks. The shapes are arbitrary.
and every single "argument" you've made showcases your stupidity and ignorance.
Contrasted with the complete lack of argument you've made.
Give me your address and I'll order a "grammar for kids" book and a dictionary for you.
Aw, buddy, you already tried that insult once. And it wasn't funny the first time.
It's not about the length of your replies, it's about who they're formatted like a teenager with Alzheimer's.
Now that one's funny! Good job. I knew you could do it.
What do you mean "no support for your claims about timekeeping systems not being arbitrary"?
I mean, support your claims that there's something inherent about timekeeping systems. Something in our brains, or in the rotation of the Earth, or in the physical properties of light, or something that means that high noon has to be represented on the clock as 1200.
That's what "support" means. That's what evidence is. That's what any reasonable, good-faith argument has to include.
You still don't understand what the word arbitrary even means?
I am starting to think that you believe "arbitrary" means "random." But that isn't what it means. It means "randomly chosen," or perhaps "selected without impetus." The Egyptians didn't have to choose twelve constellations; nobody was forcing them to, and there wasn't anything inherent about them that required them to base a system of timekeeping around it.
This is the best wake up comment I could've read. Put a laugh in my day right away hahaha thank you.
You're welcome! I love knowing that I'm helping put some joy into the world.
Also I don't believe a person like you has read a single book in your entire life.
Oh, thanks for the reminder, I forgot to log the book I finished yesterday.
You still can't even answer without making it like homework for yourself, singling out things as if this is some official debate. It isn't. It's just you equivocating.
"Wyaaa everything is actually arbitrary, EVERYTHING! So I was never wrong about it!"
The word "arbitrary" has a non-arbitrary meaning.
You can keep equivocating. It won't change anything. You're still wrong.
Yeah, I now I haven't explained to you in detail why you're wrong, but I assumed you can't be so stupid as to keep arguing that all time keeping systems are arbitrary when I point out the divisibility of hours.
Keep on lying about having read a book, surely saying you're not a moron makes it so that you magically aren't. You're ignorant of just how ignorant you are.
You definitely voted Trump with an IQ like that.
Do I need to paste the meaning of "arbitrary" here again?
Like I said, you don't even speak ONE language fluently while I speak almost a dozen on some level.
"EVERYTHING is arbitrary words don't mean anything I'm never wrong and I'm not lying or pretending"
When will you realise I've never taken you seriously, clown? You're my ENTERTAINMENT.
-
It's true, because it's true.
A tautology isn't a reason, it's a logical fallacy. Maybe even a religion. This would be a really weird religion to have a holy war over.
saying something is "arbitrary" because you don't understand the reason
As opposed to just insisting that something isn't because you don't know the reason, like you seem to be doing? Prove me wrong. Provide any evidence. Or honestly even just a claim, a claim would at least be something worth discussing.
Really American, I might say.
Well, you're not wrong there.
You still don't know what "arbitrary" means. 12, 24, 30, even 100 hour systems are in no way arbitrary.
So they came from the universe factory with those meanings already imbued in them?
You don't understand what "implication" means either.
Come on, man. Make a claim. Even make a bogus claim. But don't just attack me for the fact that you don't understand my language.
all you manage is to whinge about how your mudcakes are actual food and stomp your food and cry on the ground until I pretend to eat one to make you happy.
Do I? You're the one that's been slinging insults since the moment you showed up, and "pretending to eat one" would mean telling me what you think is right instead of trying to verbally abuse me until I admit that you were right, even though you haven't actually said anything that could be right or wrong yet.
No you haven't "read a book about timekeeping",
Honestly now I'm wondering if it was a video series. I don't see it in my reading log anywhere. But it was a long time ago, so maybe it was before I started logging books.
you're just a kiddo American feeling mighty stupid that someone is mocking them.
You're not "mocking" me. You're shouting random nonsense from the opposing sidewalk and hoping that some of it makes sense.
Like I told you, I'll eventually tell you the answers,
Press X to doubt.
even though they're pretty damn obvious for people who have actually read books about timekeeping.
Then it should be pretty easy to point me toward one of these books, shouldn't it?
This is why America is ridiculed.
There are a lot of reasons why America is ridiculed, and most of them are justified.
You brought up language skills, and now try to make it seem like you didn't think it important anyway.
Pretty sure I never said anything about the number of languages one speaks being important.
Oh I've read your posts.
Citation needed.
I'm just gonna keep you publicly shaming yourself so the bots have time to archive your stupidity for the rest of the world before you delete in all in an attack of shame when I finally do educate you
Wow, you really don't know me.
"Hey is it day or night out?"
"Uh, I can't tell, it's so cloudy"
"Hey, when does this restaurant open?"
"The sign says 11:00, but I don't know what time it is. Or what day it is; it opens at 16:00 on Saturdays and not at all on Tuesdays."
"Well, I see by the sun that it's either a couple of hours before or after noon, or we're at an extreme edge of the time zone and it's exactly noon. So I guess rather than trying to find someone to ask or a restaurant that's clearly open, we should just wait in front of this door for an indeterminate amount of time."
You "read a book about timekeeping" recently.....?
If I said "recently," I misspoke. It was a long time ago.
I am not and have not argued you at any point.
This is literally what you're doing now. The first definition of "argument" is "an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one." I have a diverging view from you, apparently (even though you won't actually tell me what it is), and you're super heated about it for some reason.
You're still grossly misusing "arbitrary".
Based on the definition that you provided, I'm using it perfectly:
- based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
The choice to divide the day into twelve hours was based on the personal whim of the ancient Egyptians. They found a particular set of twelve constellations to be important, but by random choice they might well have found a different set of, say, eight constellations to be important. Or sixteen. Or ten.
The choice to begin the day (and thus the numbering of the day) twelve hours before noon was based on the personal whim of the Romans. Maybe they liked some aspects of the choice better than starting the day six hours before noon like Jewish rabbis did, or at noon itself. They may have justified it with a good reason, but the people who chose otherwise would have justified their choice with a good reason as well; so for humanity as a whole, it is arbitrary.
The choice to mark out time zones within which all hours are indexed to the local noon was also made on the personal whim of...some railroad guy (I can't remember his name) in the 19th century. He knew that the then-current system of every railway having their own time and every city along the railroad having a different local time was a bad idea (it was), but he could just as easily have chosen a UTC and suggested that the trains run on a truly universal UTC. Would it have caught on? Who knows? But we're presuming for the sake of this discussion a world in which it did.
A tautology isn't a reason. A reason is a reason. Just like how arbitrary things are arbitrary and how numbers have inherent value.
You've made several claims. Then when I point out the moronic bullshit you've said you equivocate, despite having a room-temp IQ and everyone seeing how wrong you are. It's hilarious.
Yes, you're "now wondering if it was a video series". Sure you are. As if you didn't know that you don't read books. You're not only stupid as fuck, you're also the worst liar I've seen in years.
One of the reasons Americans are mocked is because they try claiming things which everyone can see are incorrect.
Like I said, it's like watching an excited toddler playing kitchen.
No, you didn't "misspeak", you're just a very shitty liar.
rather than any reason or system.
Having a hard time understanding this sentence?
I speak a dozen languages, but you don't even speak one, so the communication issue isn't due to a lack of MY ability. ;>
You're wrong and a moron. Several times over. Run and cry I don't care, it won't change the facts.
-
You still can't even answer without making it like homework for yourself, singling out things as if this is some official debate. It isn't. It's just you equivocating.
"Wyaaa everything is actually arbitrary, EVERYTHING! So I was never wrong about it!"
The word "arbitrary" has a non-arbitrary meaning.
You can keep equivocating. It won't change anything. You're still wrong.
Yeah, I now I haven't explained to you in detail why you're wrong, but I assumed you can't be so stupid as to keep arguing that all time keeping systems are arbitrary when I point out the divisibility of hours.
Keep on lying about having read a book, surely saying you're not a moron makes it so that you magically aren't. You're ignorant of just how ignorant you are.
You definitely voted Trump with an IQ like that.
Do I need to paste the meaning of "arbitrary" here again?
Like I said, you don't even speak ONE language fluently while I speak almost a dozen on some level.
"EVERYTHING is arbitrary words don't mean anything I'm never wrong and I'm not lying or pretending"
When will you realise I've never taken you seriously, clown? You're my ENTERTAINMENT.
You still can't even answer without making it like homework for yourself, singling out things as if this is some official debate.
Homework? Nah bro. This is just what I do while I wait for my code to compile or my lunch to heat up.
"Wyaaa everything is actually arbitrary, EVERYTHING! So I was never wrong about it!"
Pretty sure that's not what I said, but go off I guess.
You're still wrong.
Citation needed.
Yeah, I now I haven't explained to you in detail why you're wrong, but I assumed you can't be so stupid as to keep arguing that all time keeping systems are arbitrary when I point out the divisibility of hours.
Ah yes, the one actual fact you've managed to dredge up, and it also just happens to be absolutely coincidental.
Keep on lying about having read a book,
I don't have any need for you to believe me. You may feel free to not. I know what I've done and who I am.
You're ignorant of just how ignorant you are.
I'm 100% absolutely certain this is true! But not in this case.
You definitely voted Trump with an IQ like that.
Definitely not. Even if I was dumb enough, I'm not cruel enough.
Do I need to paste the meaning of "arbitrary" here again?
I put it into my previous response, so I think we've got it covered for now.
Like I said, you don't even speak ONE language fluently while I speak almost a dozen on some level.
I'm so proud of you. I mean, it's not relevant to the conversation, but still. Good job.
words don't mean anything
lol, I actually have "WORDS MEAN THINGS" written on the back of a notebook somewhere. That's pretty funny that you'd say that specifically.
I'm never wrong
I've specifically said multiple times in this conversation that I know I can be wrong and I love being proven wrong. You have yet to do anything of that sort, though.
When will you realise I've never taken you seriously, clown? You're my ENTERTAINMENT.
Probably if you put it in all caps I'll believe you.
-
A tautology isn't a reason. A reason is a reason. Just like how arbitrary things are arbitrary and how numbers have inherent value.
You've made several claims. Then when I point out the moronic bullshit you've said you equivocate, despite having a room-temp IQ and everyone seeing how wrong you are. It's hilarious.
Yes, you're "now wondering if it was a video series". Sure you are. As if you didn't know that you don't read books. You're not only stupid as fuck, you're also the worst liar I've seen in years.
One of the reasons Americans are mocked is because they try claiming things which everyone can see are incorrect.
Like I said, it's like watching an excited toddler playing kitchen.
No, you didn't "misspeak", you're just a very shitty liar.
rather than any reason or system.
Having a hard time understanding this sentence?
I speak a dozen languages, but you don't even speak one, so the communication issue isn't due to a lack of MY ability. ;>
You're wrong and a moron. Several times over. Run and cry I don't care, it won't change the facts.
A tautology isn't a reason. A reason is a reason.
Ooh! You did actually read my point, yes! Very good! That's exactly what I was saying.
You've made several claims. Then when I point out
Point out, yes. Not prove. You aren't actually making any claims or providing any proof, you're just...saying stuff.
Feel free to actually say anything that isn't an insult at any time. This bad-faith tactic is frankly getting boring.
a room-temp IQ
Of course you believe in that nonsense.
you're also the worst liar I've seen in years.
Pretty easy when I'm not lying.
One of the reasons Americans are mocked is because they try claiming things which everyone can see are incorrect.
Actually, you're really starting to sound like Trump himself with statements like that. "<patently untrue assertion>, many people are saying. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it." Might want to check your skin for any hint of orange spray-tan, that stuff's insidious.
Like I said, it's like watching an excited toddler playing kitchen.
You really only have the one joke? Come on, dude, this was so much fun at the beginning. You peaked too early if this is all you're coming at me with.
I speak a dozen languages,
It's always evidence of the smartest people when they have to insist on how smart they are.
You're wrong
Citation needed.
and a moron.
Could be!
Run and cry I don't care, it won't change the facts.
Why would I cry? Because of the facts? You haven't presented any yet.
-
You still can't even answer without making it like homework for yourself, singling out things as if this is some official debate.
Homework? Nah bro. This is just what I do while I wait for my code to compile or my lunch to heat up.
"Wyaaa everything is actually arbitrary, EVERYTHING! So I was never wrong about it!"
Pretty sure that's not what I said, but go off I guess.
You're still wrong.
Citation needed.
Yeah, I now I haven't explained to you in detail why you're wrong, but I assumed you can't be so stupid as to keep arguing that all time keeping systems are arbitrary when I point out the divisibility of hours.
Ah yes, the one actual fact you've managed to dredge up, and it also just happens to be absolutely coincidental.
Keep on lying about having read a book,
I don't have any need for you to believe me. You may feel free to not. I know what I've done and who I am.
You're ignorant of just how ignorant you are.
I'm 100% absolutely certain this is true! But not in this case.
You definitely voted Trump with an IQ like that.
Definitely not. Even if I was dumb enough, I'm not cruel enough.
Do I need to paste the meaning of "arbitrary" here again?
I put it into my previous response, so I think we've got it covered for now.
Like I said, you don't even speak ONE language fluently while I speak almost a dozen on some level.
I'm so proud of you. I mean, it's not relevant to the conversation, but still. Good job.
words don't mean anything
lol, I actually have "WORDS MEAN THINGS" written on the back of a notebook somewhere. That's pretty funny that you'd say that specifically.
I'm never wrong
I've specifically said multiple times in this conversation that I know I can be wrong and I love being proven wrong. You have yet to do anything of that sort, though.
When will you realise I've never taken you seriously, clown? You're my ENTERTAINMENT.
Probably if you put it in all caps I'll believe you.
You can't even write a short comment without pasting the bits you're commenting?
It looks like you have a genuine memory issue, or this is your first time on forums.
I don't aim to prove anything to you. It is beyond hilarious that you note the divisibility of hours (while not even understanding what the word means, lol) while calling it arbitrary.
"I know what I have done and who I am"
Yup, a pathetic liar.
"Oh I'm wondering whether it was a video-series", bitch pls, you saw a random YouTube short or something.
Everything from your behaviour and word's show what an ignorant moron you are and every time you return, you're digging yourself deeper.
How many languages did you speak again? Why's there no time systems with a prime number of hours? If the amount of hours was actually arbitrary, it could. But none are. Why is that? For an arbitrary thing? Or is it that you're still not accepting the word's definition?
It's hilarious how often I end up teaching Americans English.
What's the word "arbitrary" mean again, and why did you claim "every system we use is arbitrary"? You surely weren't using the word wrong, because that'd be a mistake and you looooove admitting to mistakes you make, right? ;>
-
A tautology isn't a reason. A reason is a reason.
Ooh! You did actually read my point, yes! Very good! That's exactly what I was saying.
You've made several claims. Then when I point out
Point out, yes. Not prove. You aren't actually making any claims or providing any proof, you're just...saying stuff.
Feel free to actually say anything that isn't an insult at any time. This bad-faith tactic is frankly getting boring.
a room-temp IQ
Of course you believe in that nonsense.
you're also the worst liar I've seen in years.
Pretty easy when I'm not lying.
One of the reasons Americans are mocked is because they try claiming things which everyone can see are incorrect.
Actually, you're really starting to sound like Trump himself with statements like that. "<patently untrue assertion>, many people are saying. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it." Might want to check your skin for any hint of orange spray-tan, that stuff's insidious.
Like I said, it's like watching an excited toddler playing kitchen.
You really only have the one joke? Come on, dude, this was so much fun at the beginning. You peaked too early if this is all you're coming at me with.
I speak a dozen languages,
It's always evidence of the smartest people when they have to insist on how smart they are.
You're wrong
Citation needed.
and a moron.
Could be!
Run and cry I don't care, it won't change the facts.
Why would I cry? Because of the facts? You haven't presented any yet.
The dictionary definition of arbitrary is proof when you're having a tantrum saying it means whatever you came up with and that "all systems are arbitrary".
Equivocate all you want, you're just a very low intelligence American trying desperately to back out of having said a stupid thing. You'd be looked as way less stupid if you just admit you misused "arbitrary". Among other things.
Because you "love" admitting to mistakes you make to learn new things, don't you?
You claim time-keeping systems are arbitrary with the amount of hours they have. That is WRONG.
You'll just keep ignoring all your mistakes, because your immature ego makes you pretend you're infallible. Every projection you make is just an admittance of what you do. A bad faith tactic indeed, you can't answer anything I ask and skip all the mistakes you make.
And you think it isn't painfully obvious. Like I said, like watching a kid play kitchen.
-
You can't even write a short comment without pasting the bits you're commenting?
It looks like you have a genuine memory issue, or this is your first time on forums.
I don't aim to prove anything to you. It is beyond hilarious that you note the divisibility of hours (while not even understanding what the word means, lol) while calling it arbitrary.
"I know what I have done and who I am"
Yup, a pathetic liar.
"Oh I'm wondering whether it was a video-series", bitch pls, you saw a random YouTube short or something.
Everything from your behaviour and word's show what an ignorant moron you are and every time you return, you're digging yourself deeper.
How many languages did you speak again? Why's there no time systems with a prime number of hours? If the amount of hours was actually arbitrary, it could. But none are. Why is that? For an arbitrary thing? Or is it that you're still not accepting the word's definition?
It's hilarious how often I end up teaching Americans English.
What's the word "arbitrary" mean again, and why did you claim "every system we use is arbitrary"? You surely weren't using the word wrong, because that'd be a mistake and you looooove admitting to mistakes you make, right? ;>
I honestly had to check and see if this was a copy/paste of your previous comment. All right. This is no longer fun for me. Peace.
-
The dictionary definition of arbitrary is proof when you're having a tantrum saying it means whatever you came up with and that "all systems are arbitrary".
Equivocate all you want, you're just a very low intelligence American trying desperately to back out of having said a stupid thing. You'd be looked as way less stupid if you just admit you misused "arbitrary". Among other things.
Because you "love" admitting to mistakes you make to learn new things, don't you?
You claim time-keeping systems are arbitrary with the amount of hours they have. That is WRONG.
You'll just keep ignoring all your mistakes, because your immature ego makes you pretend you're infallible. Every projection you make is just an admittance of what you do. A bad faith tactic indeed, you can't answer anything I ask and skip all the mistakes you make.
And you think it isn't painfully obvious. Like I said, like watching a kid play kitchen.
K.
Bored now. See ya.
-
I honestly had to check and see if this was a copy/paste of your previous comment. All right. This is no longer fun for me. Peace.
It's no longer fun pretending you didn't misuse a word you clearly misused?
Wow, I'm shocked.
-
K.
Bored now. See ya.
You crawl back into a thread a week later to say "k bye" without being able to address anything you've said, to tell me you're bored?
Lol.
You should've left it well alone. Now you just seem extra mad for being called out on a mistake(s) you're now ignoring
