The Switch 2's super sluggish LCD screen is 10 times slower than a typical gaming monitor and 100 times slower than an OLED panel according to independent testing
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Nintendo is such a joke. It's worse than marvel and Star wars in terms of fanboyism, and this gives them perpetual space to never have to do better
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
That doesn't bode well for a high refresh rate screen
Edit - 120hz is only in docked mode and with a compatible 120hz screen, although the screen also supports 120hz at 1080p. I bet that will feel incredibly different than handheld mode per the article's quoted refresh rates of the actual screen.
120hz vs 30 is a massive difference in terms of perceived fluidity.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Japan's Chimolog is our second source. Its tests showed the Switch 2's display to be slightly quicker, averaging 17 ms at 60 Hz.
That's quite a huge difference though, about half that of Monitors Unboxed. Would definitely be worth finding out why the results are so different.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Pretty much the same as the switch 1 tho.
-
Nintendo is such a joke. It's worse than marvel and Star wars in terms of fanboyism, and this gives them perpetual space to never have to do better
The thing is, is they're always going to have a dedicated fanbase of parents who want to buy shit for their kids to keep them occupied for several hours a day so that they don't have to participate in their children's lives in any meaningful way.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Read the Digital Foundry's review about the screen too. Pretty disappointing to be honest. At the very least, it shouldn't be worse than the first Switch.
-
Japan's Chimolog is our second source. Its tests showed the Switch 2's display to be slightly quicker, averaging 17 ms at 60 Hz.
That's quite a huge difference though, about half that of Monitors Unboxed. Would definitely be worth finding out why the results are so different.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Nintendo probably uses more than one screen manufacturer.
-
Nintendo probably uses more than one screen manufacturer.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Yeah, could be that or the testing methods of either site might have been flawed. In any case the difference shouldn't just be brushed aside like it was in the article.
-
The thing is, is they're always going to have a dedicated fanbase of parents who want to buy shit for their kids to keep them occupied for several hours a day so that they don't have to participate in their children's lives in any meaningful way.
Reporting in, I'm one of them. Always buying shit for the kids to keep em occupied for several hours a day so I can finally mange to get a Gaming session on on the Switch 2 ^/s^
-
Read the Digital Foundry's review about the screen too. Pretty disappointing to be honest. At the very least, it shouldn't be worse than the first Switch.
It only costs 500 bucks. And as my friend says, "you're not going to get 4k gaming for a dollar less, let's be honest." So they had to cut back somewhere, apparently.
-
It only costs 500 bucks. And as my friend says, "you're not going to get 4k gaming for a dollar less, let's be honest." So they had to cut back somewhere, apparently.
Yeah, I agree, and from those who have used Switch 2 are fine with the screen (anecdotal, from people I know), but that being said, it shouldn't be worse than Switch 1! It just feels bad knowing that
-
That doesn't bode well for a high refresh rate screen
Edit - 120hz is only in docked mode and with a compatible 120hz screen, although the screen also supports 120hz at 1080p. I bet that will feel incredibly different than handheld mode per the article's quoted refresh rates of the actual screen.
120hz vs 30 is a massive difference in terms of perceived fluidity.
Can say from experience, its a lot smoother while docked. That said, performance in handheld mode isn't problematic, it's just (unsurprisingly) less smooth.
-
Can say from experience, its a lot smoother while docked. That said, performance in handheld mode isn't problematic, it's just (unsurprisingly) less smooth.
Thanks for your hands-on feedback!
-
This post did not contain any content.
It's amazing how little noise this got until DF did their review.... Almost like it's a non-issue for most people.
Next up: Nintendo Switch 2 causes cancer in the State of California! Get the pitchforks and torches ready!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Sincere question, particularly to PC gamers, when will the bitching stop? Fr? Every single motherfucking day, yalls invent some new reason why the S2 sucks. Can yalls just shut the fucking fuck up and let children enjoy their goddam video games? Grow up.
-
It's amazing how little noise this got until DF did their review.... Almost like it's a non-issue for most people.
Next up: Nintendo Switch 2 causes cancer in the State of California! Get the pitchforks and torches ready!
Exactly!!!! Like theyāre just making up shitāthe screen is fucking fine! Like what do they fucking WANT?!
-
Read the Digital Foundry's review about the screen too. Pretty disappointing to be honest. At the very least, it shouldn't be worse than the first Switch.
Why not? If they can cut costs by reducing specs that don't matter to their target audience, that just seems like sound engineering.
-
This post did not contain any content.
How does it compare to other handhelds, though? Slower than the original Switch is bad, but if these smaller panels are less responsive in general then I'm not sure I care if they compare poorly to larger PC monitor panels. I am not buying a handheld to compete directly with my PC.
