So I see people arguing whether this is AI or not and I just wanna say that
-
So I see people arguing whether this is AI or not and I just wanna say that
What people should take away from all of this is that we're rapidly approaching a point where we're simply unable to accurately determine whether something is generated or not. And we, as individuals and as a society, are not ready for that. We're heading into a different world, and we better prepare for it, as well as re-examine our relationship to art and images before we're forced to do so by the circumstances
-
So I see people arguing whether this is AI or not and I just wanna say that
What people should take away from all of this is that we're rapidly approaching a point where we're simply unable to accurately determine whether something is generated or not. And we, as individuals and as a society, are not ready for that. We're heading into a different world, and we better prepare for it, as well as re-examine our relationship to art and images before we're forced to do so by the circumstances
wrote on last edited by [email protected]It will never be worth accepting every image as real
That's how you entirely become detached from reality.
Always question the legitimacy of every new image
-
So I see people arguing whether this is AI or not and I just wanna say that
What people should take away from all of this is that we're rapidly approaching a point where we're simply unable to accurately determine whether something is generated or not. And we, as individuals and as a society, are not ready for that. We're heading into a different world, and we better prepare for it, as well as re-examine our relationship to art and images before we're forced to do so by the circumstances
This was a real picture with an AI portrait filter applied. So it really is an AI image, and the original that OP posted looks normal and non-AI. We are not yet at the point where it’s impossible to tell them apart.
-
This was a real picture with an AI portrait filter applied. So it really is an AI image, and the original that OP posted looks normal and non-AI. We are not yet at the point where it’s impossible to tell them apart.
People didn't use to call those AI images. They used to call them images with a filter
Sure, some form of machine learning was involved, but so was your Google search for the previous decade. Unless one specifies what one means by AI, I still stand by my statement
In addition, OP's image was still real, even if it had a filter on. A lot of people's images have such filters on, especially since often they're applied automatically. That's the whole difference and the point
