Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Europe
  3. Macron Suggests Extending French Nuclear Umbrella To European Allies In Face Of Russian Aggression.

Macron Suggests Extending French Nuclear Umbrella To European Allies In Face Of Russian Aggression.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Europe
europe
43 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • foni@lemm.eeF [email protected]

    well, the nuclear launch protocol varies between powers, but I suppose it would have to be the chief of the executive in some kind of according with a high military chief

    phneutral@feddit.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    phneutral@feddit.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Which would be Ursula von der Leyen at the moment.

    foni@lemm.eeF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • phneutral@feddit.orgP [email protected]

      Which would be Ursula von der Leyen at the moment.

      foni@lemm.eeF This user is from outside of this forum
      foni@lemm.eeF This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      As I said, it varies from one country to another, but some kind of agreement with a high military command is usually required. In any case, she is currently the head of the European executive power, she was elected by the citizens less than a year ago, yes, she should be an important point in this regard. She and whoever her successor is in the future

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gradually_adjusting@lemmy.worldG [email protected]

        I have to quibble with the idea that they were seem that way during the cold war. There was plenty of that attitude going around when America had the bomb alone of all others, but by the bay of pigs and all that, the logic of MAD was fully in effect. The field of game theory was being studied at that time by RAND specifically around possible applications with nuclear warfare.

        I don't know if there's one prevailing mindset around nukes today, but I think we can both agree that the less people see them as mere weaponry, the better. I also fear that the 'madman theory' of Nixon's era is still being applied by too many rogue nations (in which I now include the US, personally). Such charades are eventually fatal.

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        Early vs. late 60's makes all the difference here. MAD was first coined in 1962, which is the year in question, so obviously it hadn't grown to the point of being official doctrine, let alone a global, immovable strategic equilibrium. I'm not a professional historian, so maybe I'm missing something, but this has been my take on the period.

        In the 70's the system as we know it starts to develop, and you see the ABM treaty signed as a symptom of this.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • System shared this topic on
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups