It would be best if there was an EU wide nuclear program.
-
It would be best if there was an EU wide nuclear program. Not a nuclear sharing program but a nuclear program.
If this is impossible for whatever reason it is up to the member states to develop their own programs.
The Ukraine war would never have happend if they kept their nukes.
-
System shared this topic on
-
It would be best if there was an EU wide nuclear program. Not a nuclear sharing program but a nuclear program.
If this is impossible for whatever reason it is up to the member states to develop their own programs.
The Ukraine war would never have happend if they kept their nukes.
It's impossible because the EU is only slightly more cohesive than Europe was before WWI...
EU only exists because member countries saw the need for an economic power to contend with the US post-WWII. It's not like States in the US - each country is there only so long as they feel their interests are being met.
The mere thought of Brexit occuring should've been a warning shot - everyone took to castigating Britain instead of examining why it could even be an idea, let alone actually happening.
-
It's impossible because the EU is only slightly more cohesive than Europe was before WWI...
EU only exists because member countries saw the need for an economic power to contend with the US post-WWII. It's not like States in the US - each country is there only so long as they feel their interests are being met.
The mere thought of Brexit occuring should've been a warning shot - everyone took to castigating Britain instead of examining why it could even be an idea, let alone actually happening.
The beginning of the EU started to keep France from trying to invade the Saarland again.
-
The beginning of the EU started to keep France from trying to invade the Saarland again.
to keep France from trying to invade the Saarland
I knew the EU was a mistake. /s
-
It's impossible because the EU is only slightly more cohesive than Europe was before WWI...
EU only exists because member countries saw the need for an economic power to contend with the US post-WWII. It's not like States in the US - each country is there only so long as they feel their interests are being met.
The mere thought of Brexit occuring should've been a warning shot - everyone took to castigating Britain instead of examining why it could even be an idea, let alone actually happening.
Your entire comment is wrong.
Brexit happened because the EU is not only limited to trading.
Also... "Only slightly more cohesive" ? France and Germany were having skirmishes and ready to start a war years before WWI actually started. Germany didn't shoot a Rafale yet, I think we're doing OK
-
It's impossible because the EU is only slightly more cohesive than Europe was before WWI...
EU only exists because member countries saw the need for an economic power to contend with the US post-WWII. It's not like States in the US - each country is there only so long as they feel their interests are being met.
The mere thought of Brexit occuring should've been a warning shot - everyone took to castigating Britain instead of examining why it could even be an idea, let alone actually happening.
EU only exists because member countries saw the need for an economic power to contend with the US post-WWII. It’s not like States in the US
I'm pretty sure the US was very involved in the process of establishing more union and collaboration in Europe.
You wrote "only exists because". Did you man "only still exists because"? But then the post WW2 comment doesn't make much sense.
The US also did a lot of economic support. So which time frame are you referring to?
-
System shared this topic on
