Signal's CEO: Then We're Leaving Sweden | Sweden Herald
-
I'm a bit surprised that the armed forces are openly opposing this, but good for them!
-
If they did that, Signal would no longer exist at all. Nobody anywhere in the world would want to continue using it.
-
I have to ask. If Signal "leaves" Sweden because it is deemed illegal without backdoor, how would this even work regarding enforcement? Your phone gets searched and if they find Signal you get a fee? Messaging being blocked somehow by Swedish ISPs, is that even possible?
-
That is because they just decided to switch to use it for internal communications. This means that they would have to roll back that decision.
-
Signal will be delisted from Android/Apple store. That'll curb the majority of Signal use in Sweden. I suspect Sweden isn't going to after individuals. They could if they wanted to. ISP blocking, probably not, but yes ISPs can block Signal by blocking all known Signal servers. That's why Signal supports special proxies that allow individuals to run to allow people from blocked locations to access the Signal servers.
-
They will likely IP geofence Sweden to block connections to Signal’s servers being made there.
-
The proposed law would require messaging apps to store copies of user messages.
The law isn’t targeted at users directly. It’s targeted at the service providers. If the cops can access your phone you’re already screwed.
Blocking Signal traffic might be theoretically feasible but it would be a game of whack-a-mole. Legally, Signal might have to stop serving IPs in Sweden but that’s Sweden’s problem and VPNs exist.
-
I think you wildly misunderstand the average person's motivations and how they weigh decisions.
-
Nice PR move, but when do you announce leaving the US, which is the much bigger issue right now?
-
While that's generally true, one of the main reasons why people choose apps like Signal is the privacy. People that aren't aware and don't care generally wouldn't have switched to Signal in the first place.
-
While that's generally true, one of the main reasons why people choose apps like Signal is the privacy. People that aren't aware and don't care generally wouldn't have switched to Signal in the first place.
-
The "average person" you have in mind who obviously does not care about cryptographic security also does not use Signal.
-
We're talking about Signal, not FB Messenger. People use Signal because of the encryption, and they would leave.
-
i am searching their link to Sweden
::: spoiler no link found yet, i will search again
.
https://signal.org/
2013–2025 Signal, a 501c3 nonprofit.
"Signal", Signal logos, and other trademarks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Signal Technology Foundation in the United States and other countries (more info here).
.
https://signal.org/donate/
Signal Technology Foundation is a nonprofit under section 501c3 of the US Internal Revenue Code.
:::
. -
Usually enforcement happens at companies, not people.
Signal would get a fee, transactions flowing through their country would get seized.
It doesn't affect people who use it. That would be authoritarian censorship.
-
No. Thats not what the law does. Sweden doesn't do censorship.
-
There are a few people in my social bubble that are not technical at all, but heard a few bad things about WhatsApp and that's why they are using Signal. Nothing more, they do not know how it works, they do not know who provides it.
-
That’ll curb the majority of Signal use in Sweden.
...unless a bunch of users plan to actually do something illegal, in which case a delisting from the app store doesn't stop anything. Once again, it's just to enable data collection about as many ordinary citizens as possible.
-
"Leaving a country" for digital services usually means not providing services there anymore.
-
thats not the target audience, thankfully.
