Time to bash Americans again
-
They haven't figured out that the entire movement that's their entire personality hates people like them?
That's hilariously sad!
-
Also crazy as they don’t really have that much freedom. They’re slaves to capitalism.
I mean, so are most of us at this point. Though working to buy more guns and stuff for "freedom" is peak irony.
-
Oh cool.
Can you give us the statistics for school shootings in Europe so I can compare?
wrote last edited by [email protected]Well I can, but this is where people will argue what counts as "Europe." Wikipedia maintains a list specifically titled "List of School Shootings in Europe".
Using the same metrics as the US number (1999-current) the total number of European school shootings is 88, if not for 2024 the US and Europe would be pretty close between 1999 and 2023 (US 131 vs Europe 84).
For the other statistics the "What is Europe" becomes an even bigger problem and also the way schools are structured in Europe gets fiddly. Europe much more prefers a higher quantity of small schools while the US seems to prefer concentrating more students in less schools. So Europe has ~1.47 million primary education schools and 79k secondary education schools for ~70 million students vs the US with 130k schools for ~50 million students.
So, Europe has 40% more students, ~10x more schools, and ~25% as many school shootings. If we don't count 2024 then Europe would have 64% as many school shootings as the US. One of the biggest holdups for making the data comparable is adjusting the European number of schools to match US schools or vice versa. If Europe had school distributions similar to the US the EU would have ~182,000 schools (70mil/x=50 mil/130000) and if the US had schools distributed similarly to Europe the US would have ~1.11 million schools (70 mil/1.54 mil=70mil/x).
When the number of schools is adjusted for differences in school structure European students have an annual average chance of a school shooting of 0.00185% (0.00184% not counting 2024) (88 shootings/26 years/182000 adjusted schools) or a 0.03% chance of ever having a school shooting ((1-(1-0.0000185)^12)). The US on the other hand would have an annual average chance of a school shooting 0.01369% (0.00403% not counting 2024) (463 shootings/26 years/130000 actual schools) or about 0.2% chance of ever having a school shooting ((1-(1-0.0001369)^12)).
Before anyone points out that my previous math showed 4% I'll remind you that that was only using 2024 data, not all 26 years.
So when you actually look and adjust for Europe fundamentally having 10x more schools for 40% more students the incidence of school shootings over the last 26 years haven't been that different. In the US it is about 7.4x more likely that a school will experience a shooting per year than in Europe, when adjusting the quantity of schools, but the % chance is already so incredibly low it doesn't really increase the chance that a given student will ever experience a school shooting.
It is worth noting that Europe does have 10x more schools, and so when a school shooting does occur less people are in the school to be exposed to the shooting, but not taking it into account is an apples and oranges comparison.
EDIT: Just to quickly bring it back to my original argument, the difference between Europe and the US isn't really how often a student will experience a school shooting, but rather the attitudes toward such events. Europe seems to grieve, find justice for those hurt, learn from mistakes, and move on with what works. On the other hand, in the US the parents grieve, someone sues, the school system looks for someone to blame, and the only thing learned is how to avoid a lawsuit.
EDIT 2: Revisited to double check and fix some math and numbers, if I messed something up feel free to let me know.
-
This post did not contain any content.
After columbine my school banned all black clothing. And forbid boys picking up sticks in case we used them to pretend they where weapons.
-
I would have said the two words are different by perspective. An "expat" is talking about where you're from. An "immigrant" is talking about where you are. Also, if you start talking about 2nd generation immigrants, then "expat" can't be used at all, which means it is narrower in scope, too.
Hopping onto this matter of perspective. I think it also takes on a state of permanence. My brother and I both moved to an EU country. He plans on returning home at some point, and he calls himself an expat, while I have no plans on returning, so I think of myself as an immigrant. Though I guess it's not the technical definition. It's how I always thought about it
-
After columbine my school banned all black clothing. And forbid boys picking up sticks in case we used them to pretend they where weapons.
I remember something about trench coats. Then those got banned.
Guns were never banned though!
-
Why would you move to the Netherlands if you are MAGA? Isn't your country so much greater again now? You ellected your king and then you left?
Gotta spread the freedumb
-
Beating up the bully requires one to be capable of such when the bully may be larger and physically imposing and part of a group then not getting treated as the guilty party afterward
I was small for my age up until 10th grade. Bullies would look at how small I was and decide I was an easy target, so they would start in on me. One thing you have to realize is that bullies aren't bullies because they are tough and good at fighting, they pick on the smallest, 'weakest' kids they can find- so being a great fighter isn't nearly as important as being willing to fight back in the first place. The point isn't to beat them up, it's to make them think twice about picking on you. If there is a chance they will get hurt, even if they end up winning the fight, they will always just move on to the next victim who wont fight back.
Between 5th grade and 10th grade I got into 1 fight every year. A kid who didn't know me would try to bully me, and I would defend myself. I never lost a fight, not because I was a badass or anything, but the teachers would break up the fights before it progressed too far. I would always get in trouble with the school, but never with my parents who taught me it was ok to defend myself (but not start fights). When word got around that about the fight, I wouldn't get picked on the rest of the school year. When the next year rolled around it was either a new student, or I was the new student. Someone who didn't know me basically who would try to bully me.
You just have to ask yourself- would you rather accept the bullying and allow it to continue, or risk getting beat up by fighting back and getting in trouble- but putting a stop to it.
Now you can get arrested and kicked out of school and have your school career and college options ruined for following the strategy you did
-
Perhaps I should have highlighted that it’s not a viable option for everybody.
I would say that your solution is also pretty shitty. As bad as bullies are many of them are doing because either they’re getting bullied / hit at home and so they act out in this way or have other issues.
I don’t think sticking them all together is the solution, we should be trying to understand why someone is doing that and see if we can make positive changes. When I say we I mean the education system.
I'm tired of having empathy for pieces of shit 99.5% of people aren't trash and we would be better on average if we dropped them in the bin.
-
I'm tired of having empathy for pieces of shit 99.5% of people aren't trash and we would be better on average if we dropped them in the bin.
It seems like you might not understand how pieces of shit can be made and also how they can change.
I wholly believe that it’s better in the long run to understand these people as surely we would want a world that doesn’t foster these people.
