Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Microblog Memes
  3. Set Camera

Set Camera

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Microblog Memes
microblogmemes
85 Posts 64 Posters 51 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    F This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    That's the second coming

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
    • S [email protected]

      ehm... shouldn't the motion blur be on the bike and not on the surroundings with a static camera?

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by [email protected]
      #40

      Yes but luckily you can add words to any picture and post it somewhere online and assert that’s the origin.

      source:

      1 Reply Last reply
      48
      • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        U This user is from outside of this forum
        U This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        Bigfoot riding a bike

        F 1 Reply Last reply
        9
        • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          H This user is from outside of this forum
          H This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          I don't know, but they have more money to burn than I do.

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • G [email protected]

            Literally a lie but okay

            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            I only saw

            You're gonna tell bro what he saw?

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • P [email protected]

              I only saw

              You're gonna tell bro what he saw?

              G This user is from outside of this forum
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by [email protected]
              #44

              In the context and how he said it, it implies the comments came after his imo. It was already quite clear at a glance by the time he commented.

              Why is he saying "actually" if he's responding to being told he didn't look through the comments, by affirming he didn't look?

              P J 2 Replies Last reply
              2
              • I [email protected]

                If you look at the frame of the bike, around where the rear shock is, it doesn't look right. Also, the scale is off, this dude would be ridiculously tall if this was a normal sized bike. Look at the size of the seat, for example.

                E This user is from outside of this forum
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                It's a Specialized S-Works Epic - a high-end cross-country bike. With the saddle dropped, I think any normal sized rider would look the same.

                Check out the 9-minute mark on this video for a comparison - I don't know if it's the same version of the bike, but it should be comparable.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  deathray5@lemmynsfw.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                  deathray5@lemmynsfw.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  Old Merlin

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • H [email protected]

                    I don't know, but they have more money to burn than I do.

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    I really want to know the original context of the photo. I suspect the face and hair are prosthetic and it's a younger rider doing something like a Jackass skit; like you say, the bike is easily upwards of $10k.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      Geico caveman.

                      tehbamski@lemmy.worldT 1 Reply Last reply
                      12
                      • ivanafterall@lemmy.worldI [email protected]

                        Geico caveman.

                        tehbamski@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tehbamski@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        Weird Fact: The Geico Caveman commercial 'characters' ended up in their own TV series called Cavemen. It only lasted one season.

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavemen_(TV_series)

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]

                          Weird Fact: The Geico Caveman commercial 'characters' ended up in their own TV series called Cavemen. It only lasted one season.

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavemen_(TV_series)

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #50

                          It was super racist and Nick Kroll was in it

                          captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • G [email protected]

                            In the context and how he said it, it implies the comments came after his imo. It was already quite clear at a glance by the time he commented.

                            Why is he saying "actually" if he's responding to being told he didn't look through the comments, by affirming he didn't look?

                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #51

                            They said "I only saw comments saying XYZ".

                            Your response was "literally a lie".

                            Any context making you believe this is false does not make it "literally" a lie. At best, it's "literally" the truth being portrayed in a misleading way (which, I really don't think it is).

                            Not really sure what your goal is anyways. They obviously didn't see the comment. Why spend time hyper-analyzing the probability of if they might have seen it or not?

                            G F 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • G [email protected]

                              In the context and how he said it, it implies the comments came after his imo. It was already quite clear at a glance by the time he commented.

                              Why is he saying "actually" if he's responding to being told he didn't look through the comments, by affirming he didn't look?

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #52

                              JFC go outside you fucking loser. Sorry I didn't parse EVERY comment for your needs. πŸ™„

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • C [email protected]

                                It was super racist and Nick Kroll was in it

                                captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                                captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #53

                                Wasn't that, like, the whole premise? That in a world where "cavemen" (apparently neanderthals?) exist alongside humans as we know them into the present day, "It's so easy, a caveman could do it" becomes racist abuse?

                                I guess the best you could do with that premise are a series of Very Special Episodes, but I bet that's not what happened. I didn't watch the show, like most people I was like "This isn't going to make a show worth seeing.

                                R C 2 Replies Last reply
                                1
                                • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC [email protected]

                                  Wasn't that, like, the whole premise? That in a world where "cavemen" (apparently neanderthals?) exist alongside humans as we know them into the present day, "It's so easy, a caveman could do it" becomes racist abuse?

                                  I guess the best you could do with that premise are a series of Very Special Episodes, but I bet that's not what happened. I didn't watch the show, like most people I was like "This isn't going to make a show worth seeing.

                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #54

                                  This isn't going to make a show worth seeing.

                                  You weren't wrong

                                  The show earned an extremely negative reception, becoming regarded as one of the worst television shows of all time.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • J [email protected]

                                    JFC go outside you fucking loser. Sorry I didn't parse EVERY comment for your needs. πŸ™„

                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #55

                                    Each time a picture looks even a bit off, the techno illiterate brigade comes to muck up the comments.

                                    It's gatekeeping and brigading in the first place, but most of you aren't even right half the time. And in this case, more then half the comments were already talking about how it wasn't AI.

                                    I'm going to call out false comments, more so when it's already been pointed out and especially when it's from the slop police. Deal with it.

                                    J F 2 Replies Last reply
                                    1
                                    • P [email protected]

                                      They said "I only saw comments saying XYZ".

                                      Your response was "literally a lie".

                                      Any context making you believe this is false does not make it "literally" a lie. At best, it's "literally" the truth being portrayed in a misleading way (which, I really don't think it is).

                                      Not really sure what your goal is anyways. They obviously didn't see the comment. Why spend time hyper-analyzing the probability of if they might have seen it or not?

                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                      #56

                                      The comment was bullshit in the first place and the fact that it wasn't AI was already pointed out. I am fucking tired of the slop police so maybe I'm being a bit too intense about it.

                                      Maybe I misunderstood and he was agreeing with me that he didn't read the comments, but it just didn't come off that way to me.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tehbamski@lemmy.worldT [email protected]
                                        This post did not contain any content.
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #57

                                        This is easily my favorite photo of the day. Why's he looking directly at the camera? Seems like he's in the middle of a pretty fast turn.

                                        F 1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • S [email protected]

                                          ehm... shouldn't the motion blur be on the bike and not on the surroundings with a static camera?

                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #58

                                          They used the CSI enhance feature.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          5
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups