Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Why aren't you creating more workers??

Why aren't you creating more workers??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
127 Posts 84 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kolanaki@pawb.socialK [email protected]

    I'm trying to get pregnant, but it's kinda hard when you're a guy. I won't stop trying, tho. 🫡

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #95

    Slay, queen king!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • A [email protected]

      Children also do disgusting things but they usually grow out of it, whereas a cat can be joking up hairballs its entire life

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #96

      On the other hand, my cat won't want an iphone in middle school and will never attempt university on my $$$ 😄

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • balderdash9@lemmy.zipB [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #97

        The birth rate moral panic is 100% manufactured by neoliberal capitalists who simultaneously want high consumption and low wages, which is a logical impossibilty. You cannot have a consumerist society where the average consumer lives paycheck to paycheck

        B A tomiant@programming.devT 3 Replies Last reply
        25
        • S [email protected]

          The math has changed.

          100 years ago, you'd get kids so you can afford eggs.

          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by [email protected]
          #98

          Yeah, then child labor laws came and ruined that for everyone.

          But don't worry, soon those too will be a thing of the past!

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • ininewcrow@lemmy.caI [email protected]

            Capitalist Corporations: .... hmmmm .... I guess there's no choice .... artificial human breeding it is!

            x4740n@lemmy.worldX This user is from outside of this forum
            x4740n@lemmy.worldX This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #99

            I feel like this is a plot of a dystopian movie somewhere where they breed artificial humans to make into slaves

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • balderdash9@lemmy.zipB [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #100

              A man must always live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him. They must even upon most occasions be somewhat more; otherwise it would be impossible for him to bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first generation...

              Every species of animals naturally multiplies in proportion to the means of their subsistence, and no species can ever multiply beyond it. But in civilised society it is only among the inferior ranks of people that the scantiness of subsistence can set limits to the further multiplication of the human species; and it can do so in no other way than by destroying a great part of the children which their fruitful marriages produce.

              The liberal reward of labour, by enabling them to provide better for their children, and consequently to bring up a greater number, naturally tends to widen and extend those limits. It deserves to be remarked, too, that it necessarily does this as nearly as possible in the proportion which the demand for labour requires. If this demand is continually increasing, the reward of labour must necessarily encourage in such a manner the marriage and multiplication of labourers, as may enable them to supply that continually increasing demand by a continually increasing population.

              • Adam Smith, the father of capitalism
              Z 1 Reply Last reply
              6
              • G [email protected]

                Yeah, then child labor laws came and ruined that for everyone.

                But don't worry, soon those too will be a thing of the past!

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #101

                This, but also retirement being a thing.

                100 years ago, kids were much less of an investment than today (they'd start pulling their own financial weight at like age 6-12, not at age 20-30 like today) and they'd be the only thing making the difference between being able to retire to one of your kids' home or the poor house.

                Nowadays kids take much more money and time to get ready, and if you have no kids you can still retire and have your retirement financed by other peoples' kids. And then you even get to keep all the money you would have spent on getting your kids ready for the world, and you can spend it on yourself.

                Financially speaking, having kids used to be a necessity and now it's a pretty bad choice.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • drunkanroot@sh.itjust.worksD [email protected]

                  im not spending a fortune to raise a child when i can barely afford eggs

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #102

                  Nice humblebrag I guess, I'm beginning to forget what eggs even taste like

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • G [email protected]

                    In the USA? If yes, the US is a sick country in regard to income distribution, labor laws, healthcare and public services. However, if your friend voted MAGA, zero sympathy and he/she can carry on.

                    eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                    eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #103

                    However, if your friend voted MAGA, zero sympathy and he/she can carry on.

                    Yeah those kids deserve to be neglected! Fuck em!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • D [email protected]

                      I would kill for a family. I'll die alone, I've accepted that. I understand that im unconventional and weird, I just wish I could meet someone that reflected that. But it's just not in the cards for a man like myself. So ill die surrounded by my animals and hopefully they'll consume my flesh so I can become Jesus 2.0 but with animals

                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #104

                      You and me both sis

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • S [email protected]

                        This, but also retirement being a thing.

                        100 years ago, kids were much less of an investment than today (they'd start pulling their own financial weight at like age 6-12, not at age 20-30 like today) and they'd be the only thing making the difference between being able to retire to one of your kids' home or the poor house.

                        Nowadays kids take much more money and time to get ready, and if you have no kids you can still retire and have your retirement financed by other peoples' kids. And then you even get to keep all the money you would have spent on getting your kids ready for the world, and you can spend it on yourself.

                        Financially speaking, having kids used to be a necessity and now it's a pretty bad choice.

                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #105

                        if you have no kids you can still retire and have your retirement financed by other peoples' kids.

                        Don't worry. They are working on getting rid of this.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • drunkanroot@sh.itjust.worksD [email protected]

                          im not spending a fortune to raise a child when i can barely afford eggs

                          U This user is from outside of this forum
                          U This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #106

                          Don't worry when they get desperate enough they'll make condoms illegal

                          tomiant@programming.devT 1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • balderdash9@lemmy.zipB [email protected]
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                            abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #107

                            I mean you're half right. In a zoo, the keepers care for their animals, making sure they're well fed, enriched, and healthy.

                            We're being farmed. They are using us to make money from our produce (labour). They're using us to make money. We're so over exploited we simply cannot afford to have children.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            10
                            • ininewcrow@lemmy.caI [email protected]

                              It would be economically viable up to a certain age. And if you maintained a certain age average, costs could be easily maintained to sustainable levels.

                              When you start analyzing the world and people as a series of costs and expenses, it's very easy to find solutions.

                              As humans, we've already done that many times before .... most recently in the 1940s on an industrial scale .... we are capable of doing it again.

                              L This user is from outside of this forum
                              L This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #108

                              If we're going that route billionaires are less economically viable than children...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • A [email protected]

                                Children also do disgusting things but they usually grow out of it, whereas a cat can be joking up hairballs its entire life

                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #109

                                They can at least learn to mitigate it. My cat learned that I preferred that he puke on the linoleum rather than the wood floor/carpet. He made an effort to do so.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • G [email protected]

                                  The problem developed nations are currently facing is that we need enough young people working to continue to support the current population as it ages and retires. The absolute population probably doesn't need to be as big as it is (unless you plan on starting a war like Russia for example) but it's not clear how to manage a reducing population gracefully.

                                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #110

                                  Eh... there's always Ättestupa...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D [email protected]

                                    A man must always live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him. They must even upon most occasions be somewhat more; otherwise it would be impossible for him to bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first generation...

                                    Every species of animals naturally multiplies in proportion to the means of their subsistence, and no species can ever multiply beyond it. But in civilised society it is only among the inferior ranks of people that the scantiness of subsistence can set limits to the further multiplication of the human species; and it can do so in no other way than by destroying a great part of the children which their fruitful marriages produce.

                                    The liberal reward of labour, by enabling them to provide better for their children, and consequently to bring up a greater number, naturally tends to widen and extend those limits. It deserves to be remarked, too, that it necessarily does this as nearly as possible in the proportion which the demand for labour requires. If this demand is continually increasing, the reward of labour must necessarily encourage in such a manner the marriage and multiplication of labourers, as may enable them to supply that continually increasing demand by a continually increasing population.

                                    • Adam Smith, the father of capitalism
                                    Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #111

                                    They hate Smith almost as much as Marx

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • R [email protected]

                                      The birth rate moral panic is 100% manufactured by neoliberal capitalists who simultaneously want high consumption and low wages, which is a logical impossibilty. You cannot have a consumerist society where the average consumer lives paycheck to paycheck

                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #112

                                      I beg to differ; you can definitely have that society; proof is: we are currently living in it!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • rob_t_firefly@lemmy.worldR [email protected]

                                        I love this person's glasses.

                                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #113

                                        Ok. But what is the mouth

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R [email protected]

                                          The birth rate moral panic is 100% manufactured by neoliberal capitalists who simultaneously want high consumption and low wages, which is a logical impossibilty. You cannot have a consumerist society where the average consumer lives paycheck to paycheck

                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #114

                                          If it's neoliberalism, why is the right always clamouring about it? I think you are misguided on your aim my friend. You are also right, the time of us having things and enjoying our leisure are in the process of being erased for the good old days of company towns and food lines.

                                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups