80 Teslas damaged at Hamilton dealership, largest car vandalism reported in Canada against the U.S. company | CBC News
-
Nothing lost then, same status as dealership. Only slightly more inconvenienced since its their car but even then they get a rental from insurance company.
-
Awe shucks. I could stoop to the vandalism and destruction of the shitty neo-Nazi BEV. I would prefer the vehicles to be unsold and collect dust until Tesla enters bankruptcy. Tesla, himself, must have flipped in his grave several times.
-
Awe shucks. I could stoop to the vandalism and destruction of the shitty neo-Nazi BEV. I would prefer the vehicles to be unsold and collect dust until Tesla enters bankruptcy. Tesla, himself, must have flipped in his grave several times.
Nah. Tesla would be alternating in his grave.
-
This is a very typical ad hominem attack on someone’s political beliefs. Especially coming from someone who probably doesn’t think much farther past what they’re going to eat for the day, or how drunk they’re going to get on the weekend. I’m not going to insult you back because it’s very clear that yer a low information individual who’s more concerned with breaking stuff, rather than trying to repair and move on.
Life long NDP voter btw. But I’m sure you’ll just scoff at this and continue to throw low IQ insults around.
I see, you're in Canada. I'm an American. You don't understand my fear. You only have to deal with tariffs, I mean that sucks but my government is literally turning fascist, you get to just buy Canadian and move on. You don't and can't know what that's like... Don't try unless you plan to sympathize.
Well at least I'm glad you don't understand my fear. If you did you'd be in our position.
-
I see, you're in Canada. I'm an American. You don't understand my fear. You only have to deal with tariffs, I mean that sucks but my government is literally turning fascist, you get to just buy Canadian and move on. You don't and can't know what that's like... Don't try unless you plan to sympathize.
Well at least I'm glad you don't understand my fear. If you did you'd be in our position.
-
Totally makes sense
-
Republicans won because of voter suppression and purging. What you're saying is "Pants on fire" rewriting of history. Also Jan6ers were much, much more violent so I think Democrats are simply trying out their fascism strategy.
Vandalizing Teslas is legal, the precedent was set when Jan6ers were pardoned. So your morality argument is wrong too.
If you need to tell yourself that "they cheated" then you are doing exactly what Republicans did in 2020 making you just like them. Yes the Jan6ers were pardoned but most people do not support it and believe those people should be in prison. Just like the people fire bombing tesla dealerships and charging stations should be in prison.
-
If you need to tell yourself that "they cheated" then you are doing exactly what Republicans did in 2020 making you just like them. Yes the Jan6ers were pardoned but most people do not support it and believe those people should be in prison. Just like the people fire bombing tesla dealerships and charging stations should be in prison.
A strawman, Republicans claimed election fraud (2 + 2 = 5), Democrats claimed voter suppression disproportionately affects them (2 + 2 = 4). What do you think 2 + 2 = ?
You think that violent insurrection against our country by storming the capitol is the same as vandalizing a few cars? How long do you think the sentences should be for each crime? I'd say one is 100x the sentence of the other.
-
Me: <a reasonable argument followed by empathy>
You: Twat!
Lol. It's fine, I give you permission to keep your anger at all Americans. It's actually probably better that way, we deserve it.
-
I suspect they would NOT be in a rush to sell, given their comments.
yikes that's embarrassing
-
A strawman, Republicans claimed election fraud (2 + 2 = 5), Democrats claimed voter suppression disproportionately affects them (2 + 2 = 4). What do you think 2 + 2 = ?
You think that violent insurrection against our country by storming the capitol is the same as vandalizing a few cars? How long do you think the sentences should be for each crime? I'd say one is 100x the sentence of the other.
Firebombing car dealerships, charging stations, and violent attacks against people who drive Teslas isn't "vandalization" . 90,000,000 eligible voters didnt vote by choice. They are vocal on why they didn't vote and it's not voter suppression. Keep lying to yourself if you want or just go read about the reasons. It's not a secret.
-
So the same goes if the Tesla is carrying a family in it and some fella goes and brake checks it? Or runs it off the road?
That's not vandalism. That's like murder.
-
That's not vandalism. That's like murder.
-
Firebombing car dealerships, charging stations, and violent attacks against people who drive Teslas isn't "vandalization" . 90,000,000 eligible voters didnt vote by choice. They are vocal on why they didn't vote and it's not voter suppression. Keep lying to yourself if you want or just go read about the reasons. It's not a secret.
There are many reasons for an election win or loss. But the big one we care about in 2024 was widespread purging. It's quasilegal, there's evidence of it, it's cheating, and it suppresses Democrat votes much more.
There were 7 billion people who didn't immigrate into the US and thus didn't vote, they were very clear as to why they didn't come to America. That's just as relevant as your 90 million, actually more because it's 100x the people! Don't get me started on extraterrestrials we didn't find, there could be trillions. It was clear the reasons we didn't fund SETI.
"Vandalizing isn't vandalizing". You made no argument here.
-
Okay cool. Cause that where this is headed. I’ve seen I videos of it. I’m afraid it’s only a matter of time until some fuckstick that thinks he’s helping the cause and goes too far.
This is the point I’m trying to make.
Wow. will i hope you are very wrong about that prophecy. Im all for insurance paying up but unless the car has nazi flags I see no point of going that hard.
-
If the bots and toxicity haven't killed it, I don't know what we could even do at this point.
-
There are many reasons for an election win or loss. But the big one we care about in 2024 was widespread purging. It's quasilegal, there's evidence of it, it's cheating, and it suppresses Democrat votes much more.
There were 7 billion people who didn't immigrate into the US and thus didn't vote, they were very clear as to why they didn't come to America. That's just as relevant as your 90 million, actually more because it's 100x the people! Don't get me started on extraterrestrials we didn't find, there could be trillions. It was clear the reasons we didn't fund SETI.
"Vandalizing isn't vandalizing". You made no argument here.
"Purging" you mean only allowing eligible voters to vote? It's "quasilegal"? No each state is responsible to maintain updated and correct voter roles. There is nothing controversial about it. You lost the election. People didn't want to vote and they openly spoke about why they didn't. Most didn't like either candidate and didn't want to support either party. You lost the election and no one cheated just like the republicans in 2020.
-
"Purging" you mean only allowing eligible voters to vote? It's "quasilegal"? No each state is responsible to maintain updated and correct voter roles. There is nothing controversial about it. You lost the election. People didn't want to vote and they openly spoke about why they didn't. Most didn't like either candidate and didn't want to support either party. You lost the election and no one cheated just like the republicans in 2020.
One such review of evidence of what I'm saying that contradicts your argument:
https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/
Too many logical fallacies in your comment to reply without losing your attention span but I'll try.
Eligible voters were removed, the link proves it. Quasilegal because it's a gray area in the law, here's litigation against the practice but only in some states and inconsistently, hence "quasi": https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/mass-purges-are-new-voter-suppression. Not controversial: a strange lie, of course it's controversial, most people don't believe your argument. People didn't want to vote for Trump in China/India, that is more relevant than your argument as I've said before you circled back. No one cheated: false, again.
If that evidence is unconvincing, what evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?
