US prosecutors to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione
-
Bizzare. Americans are seriously crazy. It's a monarchy really, it's so in your face, like a bad comedy.
-
Luigi Mangione has been the only thing uniting the left and right in the US. This is one of the few things that has managed to break through Fox News propaganda. Killing a legendary hero isn’t the win the GOP thinks it is.
-
Maybe we should put the prosecutors to death instead.
-
Wow. There's a huge disparity between the brows on those two. No matter how blurry the first pics are, the thickness of Luigi's brows would be noticeable. The person in that camera footage definitely doesn't have thick eyebrows like Luigi
-
This post did not contain any content.
Seems very short-sighted on their part. They’ve made the penalty for taking out 1 the same as taking out 100. They’ve also highlighted the disparity between punishments for crimes against average people vs the rich and powerful.
-
Nobody did it, the guys head just did that.
Exactly, he had spontaneous lead spawn pop up inside him. Happens every day to assholes
-
Maybe, but honestly there isn't too much a need for them to thanks to the existence of things like TLO. Maybe for surveillance over less developed areas?
Idk I'm not happy about any of this but it's interesting to speculate what a modern day cyberpunk is going to look like.
That's fair, there's other angles of observation made available already.
Seeing as you like speculating about cyberpunk, how about if observation is just the initial way to way to sell the drone cloud? Depending on how cheap you can make them, there's an argument to made for reducing time-to-intercept for low-speed aerial objects.
If you've got a bunch of drones overhead already, you could run one in to the path of a kamikaze drone, or if your swarm is even lightly armed, you can extend engagement range and reduce required accuracy with a single buckshot shell to shoot an offending drone down.
If you're content to prioritize executive safety over public saftey, there's a lot that can be done.
Drone displays terrify me.
-
This post did not contain any content.
There’s a guy who killed 23 people in a Walmart in El Passo in 2022. Got charged with hate crimes on account of…he’s openly racist and said that’s why he did it.
That guy just got a plea deal to avoid the death penalty.
Nobody should identify the criminal justice system in America as anything else but a mechanism for protecting the rich.
-
That's fair, there's other angles of observation made available already.
Seeing as you like speculating about cyberpunk, how about if observation is just the initial way to way to sell the drone cloud? Depending on how cheap you can make them, there's an argument to made for reducing time-to-intercept for low-speed aerial objects.
If you've got a bunch of drones overhead already, you could run one in to the path of a kamikaze drone, or if your swarm is even lightly armed, you can extend engagement range and reduce required accuracy with a single buckshot shell to shoot an offending drone down.
If you're content to prioritize executive safety over public saftey, there's a lot that can be done.
Drone displays terrify me.
How about if observation is just the initial way to way to sell the drone cloud? Depending on how cheap you can make them, there's an argument to made for reducing time-to-intercept for low-speed aerial objects. If you're content to prioritize executive safety over public saftey, there's a lot that can be done.
This isn't something I've ever considered, I hate it!
Essentially a light weight, personal, iron dome. Considering the great lengths Putin goes through to protect himself from his own military, I could see the mango and friends doing this.Hell imagine if they made the drone cloud then took Israel's "Gospel", slapped that into them and create a full blown Big brother. Sure it just recommends targets now, but with more training from two fascist states it could become something much worse.
I hate this timeline.
-
Wait. They have to swear an oath that they don't know shit about the legal system?
No, you swear an oath to answer honestly during the jury selection process. The lawyers will ask if you have any moral or ethical concerns that would prevent you from convicting the accused - ie you would be willing to engage in jury nullification. If you say no, but you actually do intend to nullify, then you lied under oath and could be found guilty of perjury at that point.
-
Incels should honestly be targeting country clubs instead of elementary schools.
The ruling class plays a much bigger role in why they're incels than school students do.
They’re not smart people. This would require the ability to critically think and reason with facts. They’re brainwashed by the billionaire backed right wing propaganda machine. Women/brown people=bad. Billionaires/White Men =good
-
This post did not contain any content.
Trumps agenda? Hah.
-
System shared this topic on
