Truly delightful
-
here to rep "through the magic of having a broken one...!"
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Through the magic of latent heat we have 4 likes for every unit of person
-
Sam O'Nella was caught up in H Bomber Guy's plagiarism tea spillI misremembered, please accept my apology for being incorrect.
In what way?
-
For real though! What a weird watch
In a way it was a breath of fresh a air to hear the high honestly described in a way that makes it understandable why people would want to do it again, but also how it will never, ever be as good as the first time, and will ruin your life.
-
+styropyro +benn jordan +chubbyemu +hemereview +creganford +esoterica +religion for breakfast +dark science +philosophy tube +wisecrack +gutsick gibbon +metta beshay +Hamilton Morris +PBS eons +sage the bad naturalist +Steve mould +talon fitness +the poopie show +thought emporium +useful charts +weird explorer +writing with andrew
+AlphaPhoenix +Applied Science +Breaking Taps +ProjectsInFlight +suckerpinch
-
Shout out to PBS Space Time
PBS Eons is also pretty good, if you're into paleontology.
-
+ElectroBoom, if you want to see grown adult play with electricity
You mean Photonic Induction
-
In what way?
You know what, I apologize, I misremembered the YouTuber in question. Editing my original comment to reflect my incorrectness.
-
I might be in a niche. Here's my fav, Religion for Breakfast, Let's Talk Religion, Esoterica, Al-Muqaddimah, Tablets and Temples, Useful Charts. Not religious but I like Religious Studies because it's overlaps to history.
In addition, the Crash Course series to Religious Studies by PBS is also very good.
Also few history channel, Dan Davis History, A Historian's Craft, Kings and Generals
I always liked how religious studies overlaps philosophy and mythology. Whether someone is religious or not, there’s been an awful lot of thinking about ethics, morality, and thinking, that may be generally interesting. Also, seeing trends and commonality across mythologies, seeking understanding across mythologies may apply regardless whether you’re religious
-
You can tell the Gates-bucks have really leaned them in a neo-liberal slant. It kind of sucks.
It has been neoliberal biased for ages. For example this is a 2021 article calling out their neoliberal bias. https://aninjusticemag.com/the-inescapable-neoliberal-bias-behind-kurzgesagt-in-a-nutshell-215eb1e9b70f?gi=9574bf28f4a0
But it has undoubtedly gotten a lot worse recently. That south korea video was abymaly blind and baked in unrealistic capitalist assumptions.
-
It's been fairly neoliberal for awhile now, I can't remember which video it was but one of them really put a bad taste in my mouth. Whatever it was, imo it felt very apologist of capitalism. I unsubbed after that.
They did a recent south korea video which was super neolib biased.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I'd like to submit
SmarterEveryDay (Highly suggest this video of the James Webb Telescope https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu97IiO_yDI )
Honorable mention (because 'retired') Tom Scott
And because it's a good channel Dad How Do I?
-
Also:
LockPickingLawyer
How To Cook That
Captain Disillusion
Pilot Debreif
Stand-Up Maths
It's a mix of interesting and meh to me, but if Stand-up Maths got your interest, you might want to take a look at Numberphile as well.
-
This post did not contain any content.
University course lectures are still the best and you can find tons of them in YouTube in their entirety.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I love threads like this where we collectively come together and share our YouTube subs and we all grow stronger every time we find a new one to add to our list
-
They're pretty okay for shallow understanding on a subject, but Wendover (not on the list), Economics Explained (not on the list), and CGP gray all get stuff pretty wrong once you get past shallow depth. I know because I'm a huge transit/urbanism nerd. If these channels haven't wronged you in some minor way, they just haven't talked about something you're a subject matter expert in yet. The point here isn't that they're bad, just understand that these are shallow explainers, the next step in from like a news article, Wikipedia, or a blog, and take them with a grain of salt.
My personal list is Kurzgesagt, XKCD explained, and The Action Lab.
Wendover is pretty bad and finding out they take essentially bribes in the form of free stays and travel from an amusement park to say only nice things a little them after the park had an accident that killed a kid makes it so it's pretty obvious it's not about being good content for us but for the people making it. Likely tax write-offs and funny accounting all over their channels.
They state that they aren't for education but entertainment and thus don't have a to cite sources either.
Yeah they aren't a trustworthy source is my point. -
I'd like to submit
SmarterEveryDay (Highly suggest this video of the James Webb Telescope https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu97IiO_yDI )
Honorable mention (because 'retired') Tom Scott
And because it's a good channel Dad How Do I?
I liked smarter every day but recently I have been kinda put off because of his fairly frequent military propaganda for USA's military.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Dr. Roy Casagranda gives amazing lectures on history in general, especially political history and the history of the middle east.
-
They're pretty okay for shallow understanding on a subject, but Wendover (not on the list), Economics Explained (not on the list), and CGP gray all get stuff pretty wrong once you get past shallow depth. I know because I'm a huge transit/urbanism nerd. If these channels haven't wronged you in some minor way, they just haven't talked about something you're a subject matter expert in yet. The point here isn't that they're bad, just understand that these are shallow explainers, the next step in from like a news article, Wikipedia, or a blog, and take them with a grain of salt.
My personal list is Kurzgesagt, XKCD explained, and The Action Lab.
There's not really a way around this, and I think one of the explainer channels actually went into depth about it.
They gave an example of how everyone learns that the earth is a sphere, but once you 'dig deeper' you find it's not actually a sphere because it's elongated at the equator (making it a spheroid.) You can then 'dig even deeper' and find that the earth isn't really a spheroid, it has mountains and all kinds of other inconsistencies that don't matter to most people but can make a difference to an expert.
The real takeaway is that we should not consider ourselves experts, or even significantly more knowledgeable about a subject because we saw a video on one of these channels. They're for entertainment first.
-
Seriously, Im really worried about the generations that are learning economics from CGP Grey who is not only not an expert but is frequently wrong.
Wouldn't be any different from previous generations thinking they know something without having experience to back it up.
-
I don’t think it’s on purpose. He got his before the vasy majority knew what a shithead Musk is.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]So the only thing determining whether tesla is good or bad in your eyes is the ceo?
They never provided competitive value to customers, even when Musk was taking the left for a ride.
