Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Europe
  3. A European Starlink rival's shares skyrocketed 390% in a week — here's why

A European Starlink rival's shares skyrocketed 390% in a week — here's why

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Europe
europe
31 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Elon's own goals started with a botched penis surgery and went downhill from there.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      archmageazor@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
      archmageazor@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      I wish I was smart enough to invest in them before the rise.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I [email protected]

        Speculation of them getting the Ukraine contract according to the article

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        It's more that Starlink is proven not secure and not to be trusted by any country.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L [email protected]

          it was like 1.20€ per share, so investors don't really had much to lose. that plays a big part IMO. if you're only losing a few bucks worst case, the risk isn't a problem.

          J This user is from outside of this forum
          J This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          While price does negatively (with few outliers) correlate with volatility in the stock market, this seems like more than that. 22M volume on the 5th is more than the stock has seen... ever, as far as I can see, with an overwhelming majority being held by insiders or institutions. The bet appears to be larger than a few bucks, from people who I presume expect big things.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M [email protected]

            The current amount is only about a third of the total planned amount.

            natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
            natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            And that's just one of the constellations…

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z [email protected]

              They only need to cover the band that orbits over Ukraine for now tho, not the entire world right

              natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
              natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              That's still a lot since those satellites aren't geostationary. To guarantee a stable, permanent connection in all of Ukraine and the adjacent Sea I'd assume you might need up to 3 of those bands of satellites.
              Now, fortunately, Ukraine doesn't necessarily require a lot of bandwidth. It just has to be a reliable few mbps that can be easily set up everywhere.

              Z 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • thefeaturecreature@lemmy.caT [email protected]

                Awesome news. I wish them the absolute best because nobody should have to rely on a fascist-owned network.

                E This user is from outside of this forum
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                Certainly not an entire country's army actively defending against a hostile foreign invasion.

                https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4193788-musk-acknowledges-he-turned-off-starlink-internet-access-last-year-during-ukraine-attack-on-russia-military/

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN [email protected]

                  And that's just one of the constellations…

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  It will be the largest number though. They're the only ones that are bothering to do such a low orbit, because that gives you lower latency but means you have to have a lot more in orbit for the same coverage and they don't last as long before the orbit decays. They can do that because the launches are basically free

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S [email protected]

                    Elon's own goals started with a botched penis surgery and went downhill from there.

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    dubious:

                    as of this writing, Musk had never discussed getting a penile implant on X. Likewise, a Google search and Google News search returned no credible reports about the rumor (archived).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • natanox@discuss.tchncs.deN [email protected]

                      That's still a lot since those satellites aren't geostationary. To guarantee a stable, permanent connection in all of Ukraine and the adjacent Sea I'd assume you might need up to 3 of those bands of satellites.
                      Now, fortunately, Ukraine doesn't necessarily require a lot of bandwidth. It just has to be a reliable few mbps that can be easily set up everywhere.

                      Z This user is from outside of this forum
                      Z This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      And they need the low latency apparently, since geostationary already existed long before starlink but they arent using it

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • System shared this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups